我想看一级黄色片_欧美性爱无遮挡电影_色丁香视频网站中文字幕_视频一区 视频二区 国产,日本三级理论日本电影,午夜不卡免费大片,国产午夜视频在线观看,18禁无遮拦无码国产在线播放,在线视频不卡国产在线视频不卡 ,,欧美一及黄片,日韩国产另类

最新文章

加載中,請稍候,。,。。

熱讀文章

加載中,,請稍候,。。,。

當(dāng)期雜志
訂閱
雜志紙刊
網(wǎng)站
移動訂閱
--
--
--
Facebook會重蹈雅虎覆轍嗎?
 作者: Rob Go    時間: 2012年02月01日    來源: 財富中文網(wǎng)
 位置:         
字體 [   ]        
打印        
發(fā)表評論        

Facebook上市在即,,但卻仍然面臨著重重挑戰(zhàn)。
轉(zhuǎn)貼到: 微信 新浪微博 關(guān)注騰訊微博 人人網(wǎng) 豆瓣

????整個科技界都屏住了呼吸,,等待著Facebook下周提交首次公開募股(IPO)申請,。我本人也非常興奮,因為Facebook是頭不折不扣的巨獸,,它徹底變革了互聯(lián)網(wǎng),。

????可是,剛剛過去的這個周末里,我反復(fù)思考Facebook的情況后,,不禁產(chǎn)生了一種不安的感覺:該公司的成功似乎……只是曇花一現(xiàn),。盡管有些奇怪,可在某些方面,,F(xiàn)acebook讓我想起雅虎(Yahoo),。不是現(xiàn)在的雅虎,而是過去的雅虎,,我懷疑,,F(xiàn)acebook在未來十年中會不會像雅虎一樣衰落。

????下面列出我在這家公司身上發(fā)現(xiàn)的主要的薄弱之處:

????1. 網(wǎng)絡(luò)碎片化,。Facebook的成功很大程度上依賴于它最大規(guī)模地積聚互聯(lián)網(wǎng)用戶群,,理解及貨幣化這一用戶群的能力。受網(wǎng)絡(luò)效應(yīng)推動,,社交網(wǎng)絡(luò)的發(fā)展應(yīng)該會日益蓬勃,。可是,,我很難相信,, Facebook十年之后的頁面訪問量還能獨霸天下。我想我們已經(jīng)看到了一種趨勢:Facebook被當(dāng)成人們身份與關(guān)系的大倉庫,,而深層次的互動轉(zhuǎn)而在主旨更明確,、分化更嚴重的社區(qū)進行。分享照片最好經(jīng)由Instagram,,產(chǎn)品的社交管理可在Pinterest上進行,,自我表達通過Tumblr這樣的平臺最合適。沒錯,,F(xiàn)acebook或多或少也具備上述功能,,而且可以模仿上述公司,可是,,瑞士軍刀式兼顧一切產(chǎn)品的模式很難獲得長遠勝利,。

????2. 移動性不夠強。我認為,,移動互聯(lián)網(wǎng)將使網(wǎng)絡(luò)碎片化趨勢進一步加快,,F(xiàn)acebook面臨的一部分挑戰(zhàn)將由蘋果(Apple)創(chuàng)造的應(yīng)用生態(tài)系統(tǒng)的規(guī)則所驅(qū)動。不過總的來說,,F(xiàn)acebook的主要挑戰(zhàn)在于:它并非為“移動優(yōu)先”而打造,,而我們已經(jīng)(或者說很快將會)身處一個移動優(yōu)先的世界。我認為Facebook這樣的大公司要想在移動領(lǐng)域達到同樣的壟斷水平,,將是非常困難的,。Facebook在社交網(wǎng)絡(luò)領(lǐng)域搶占了谷歌(Google)的地盤,,正因為后者并無天然社交性(而雅虎就差得更遠了);同理我預(yù)計,,從一開始就基于移動,、分布式計算設(shè)備背景而打造的產(chǎn)品,也能迅速從Facebook那里攻城略地,。

????3. 廣告效果,。Facebook的收入頗為可觀,但大多依賴于廣告,,可對于該網(wǎng)站作為廣告媒介的效果到底如何,,我們還沒有定論。社交廣告可能很有吸引力,,但觀眾的購買意愿很低,,這點與顯示廣告相似。我還覺得,,作為一種品牌廣告媒介,,F(xiàn)acebook現(xiàn)在的廣告效果還有很大問題。你們記得今年有什么與Facebook深度整合,、真正有影響力的品牌廣告營銷攻勢嗎,?我沒印象,卻記得好幾個主要通過YouTube和Twitter進行的廣告活動,。最后,,F(xiàn)acebook尚未開發(fā)出一套有價值、有拓展性的,、可用于Facebook之外的廣告產(chǎn)品,。機會總比批評多,可如果該公司無法維持在這些領(lǐng)域的領(lǐng)先地位,,除1和2兩條外,,它還將面臨更多挑戰(zhàn)。

????The entire tech world is waiting with baited breath for the filing of Facebook's IPO next week. I'm excited – the company is an absolute monster and has completely transformed the web.

????But, as I've reflected on Facebook this past weekend, I can't help shake a nagging feeling that the company's success feels somehow…fleeting. In some weird ways, Facebook makes me think a bit of Yahoo (YHOO). Not the Yahoo of today, but the Yahoo of the past. And I wonder if Facebook will see a similar decline over the next 10 years.

????Here are the major vulnerabilities that I see:

????1. Network fragmentation. Facebook's success is largely based on its ability to aggregate the biggest audience on the Internet and understand and monetize that audience. Social networks should be incredibly robust because of network effects. But I really have a hard time believing that Facebook will continue to dominate the pageviews 10 years from now. I think we are already seeing that while Facebook serves as a great repository of one's identity and relationships, deep engagement is starting to happen in more targeted, fragmented communities. Photo sharing is done best on Instagram. Social curation of products on Pinterest. Self-expression on platforms like Tumblr. Sure, Facebook participates in this activity somewhat and could copy these companies, but Swiss Army knives almost never win long term.

????2. Not natively mobile. I think the mobile Internet will further accelerate the trend of network fragmentation. Part of Facebook's challenges will be driven by the rules of the app ecosystem that Apple has created. But mostly, Facebook's main challenge is that it was not built in a mobile-first context. We are in (or will soon be) in a mobile-first world, and I think it's hard to expect a large company like Facebook to own that domain in the same way. Just as Google (GOOG) ceded ground to Facebook because it was not natively social (and Yahoo was way, way worse), I can see Facebook ceding ground pretty quickly to products that are built with a mobile, distributed computing context in mind from the beginning.

????3. Advertising effectiveness. Facebook's impressive revenue relies largely on advertising. But I think the jury is still out on how transformative it as as an advertising medium. Social advertising can be pretty compelling, but intent is pretty low, much like display advertising. I also think that Facebook falls pretty far short currently on its effectiveness as a brand advertising medium. Do you remember any really impactful brand campaigns this year that were deeply integrated with Facebook? I don't, but do remember several that were largely driven through YouTube and Twitter. Finally, Facebook hasn't yet developed a meaningful off-Facebook advertising product that has scale. These are more opportunities than criticisms, but if the company doesn't maintain leadership in these areas, I see it as a further challenge in the face of #1 and #2.







更多




最佳評論

@關(guān)子臨: 自信也許會壓倒聰明,,演技的好壞也許會壓倒腦力的強弱,,好領(lǐng)導(dǎo)就是循循善誘的人,不獨裁,,而有見地,能讓人心悅誠服,。    參加討論>>
@DuoDuopa:彼得原理,,是美國學(xué)者勞倫斯彼得在對組織中人員晉升的相關(guān)現(xiàn)象研究后得出的一個結(jié)論:在各種組織中,,由于習(xí)慣于對在某個等級上稱職的人員進行晉升提拔,因而雇員總是趨向于晉升到其不稱職的地位,。    參加討論>>
@Bruce的森林:正念,,應(yīng)該可以解釋為專注當(dāng)下的事情,而不去想過去這件事是怎么做的,,這件事將來會怎樣,。一方面,這種理念可以幫助員工排除雜念,,把注意力集中在工作本身,,減少壓力,提高創(chuàng)造力,。另一方面,,這不失為提高員工工作效率的好方法??赡芎笳呤歉鞔驜OSS們更看重的吧,。    參加討論>>


Copyright ? 2012財富出版社有限公司。 版權(quán)所有,,未經(jīng)書面許可,,任何機構(gòu)不得全部或部分轉(zhuǎn)載。
《財富》(中文版)及網(wǎng)站內(nèi)容的版權(quán)屬于時代公司(Time Inc.),,并經(jīng)過時代公司許可由香港中詢有限公司出版和發(fā)布,。
深入財富中文網(wǎng)

雜志

·   當(dāng)期雜志
·   申請雜志贈閱
·   特約專刊
·   廣告商

活動

·   科技頭腦風(fēng)暴
·   2013財富全球論壇
·   財富CEO峰會

關(guān)于我們

·   公司介紹
·   訂閱查詢
·   版權(quán)聲明
·   隱私政策
·   廣告業(yè)務(wù)
·   合作伙伴
行業(yè)

·   能源
·   醫(yī)藥
·   航空和運輸
·   傳媒與文化
·   工業(yè)與采礦
·   房地產(chǎn)
·   汽車
·   消費品
·   金融
·   科技
頻道

·   管理
·   技術(shù)
·   商業(yè)
·   理財
·   職場
·   生活
·   視頻
·   博客

工具

·     微博
·     社區(qū)
·     RSS訂閱
內(nèi)容精華

·   500強
·   專欄
·   封面報道
·   創(chuàng)業(yè)
·   特寫
·   前沿
·   CEO訪談
博客

·   四不像
·   劉聰
·   東8時區(qū)
·   章勱聞
·   公司治理觀察
·   東山豹尉
·   山??纯?/font>
·   明心堂主
榜單

·   世界500強排行榜
·   中國500強排行榜
·   美國500強
·   最受贊賞的中國公司
·   中國5大適宜退休的城市
·   年度中國商人
·   50位商界女強人
·   100家增長最快的公司
·   40位40歲以下的商業(yè)精英
·   100家最適宜工作的公司