我想看一级黄色片_欧美性爱无遮挡电影_色丁香视频网站中文字幕_视频一区 视频二区 国产,日本三级理论日本电影,午夜不卡免费大片,国产午夜视频在线观看,18禁无遮拦无码国产在线播放,在线视频不卡国产在线视频不卡 ,,欧美一及黄片,日韩国产另类

最新文章

加載中,請(qǐng)稍候,。,。。

熱讀文章

加載中,,請(qǐng)稍候,。。,。

當(dāng)期雜志
訂閱
雜志紙刊
網(wǎng)站
移動(dòng)訂閱
--
--
--
“占領(lǐng)華爾街”運(yùn)動(dòng)抓住了要害
 作者: Roger Martin/Jennifer Riel    時(shí)間: 2011年11月11日    來(lái)源: 財(cái)富中文網(wǎng)
 位置:         
字體 [   ]        
打印        
發(fā)表評(píng)論        

問(wèn)題并不是因?yàn)槿A爾街違反規(guī)則中飽私囊,而是因?yàn)檫@些規(guī)則本身就一無(wú)是處,。
轉(zhuǎn)貼到: 微信 新浪微博 關(guān)注騰訊微博 人人網(wǎng) 豆瓣

????“占領(lǐng)華爾街”運(yùn)動(dòng)讓旁觀者滿是疑問(wèn):這些人是誰(shuí),?他們究竟想要什么,?下個(gè)城市將是哪一個(gè),?我們的政府官員將如何應(yīng)對(duì),?示威活動(dòng)已進(jìn)入第二個(gè)月,何時(shí)才會(huì)完全結(jié)束,?提出這些問(wèn)題,,是試圖理解這場(chǎng)錯(cuò)綜復(fù)雜,、迅速蔓延并正在引發(fā)社會(huì)階層對(duì)立的運(yùn)動(dòng),試圖解釋正在發(fā)生的事情,。但這些問(wèn)題并不是我們真正需要考慮的問(wèn)題,。事實(shí)上,我們應(yīng)當(dāng)想想,,這場(chǎng)運(yùn)動(dòng)為什么會(huì)發(fā)生。而且更為重要的是,,我們應(yīng)當(dāng)思考一下,,我們能從中學(xué)到些什么?

????這個(gè)轉(zhuǎn)變對(duì)于商界領(lǐng)袖來(lái)說(shuō)不那么容易,。畢竟,,我們是這場(chǎng)運(yùn)動(dòng)矛頭所指的敵人?!罢碱I(lǐng)華爾街”網(wǎng)站列出其存在的理由如下:

????“占領(lǐng)華爾街是為了還擊大銀行和跨國(guó)公司對(duì)民主進(jìn)程的腐蝕性影響,,抗擊華爾街在引發(fā)幾十年來(lái)最嚴(yán)重的經(jīng)濟(jì)衰退中扮演的角色?!本W(wǎng)站還指出:“埃及和突尼斯的民眾起義激勵(lì)了此次運(yùn)動(dòng),。運(yùn)動(dòng)旨在揭露真相,最富有的1%人群正在制定不公平的全球經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)則將讓我們失去未來(lái),?!?/p>

????事情就是這樣。這是99%與1%的對(duì)抗,,即其他所有人與最富的人的對(duì)抗,。這樣的區(qū)分將兩個(gè)人群完全對(duì)立了起來(lái)。這一方面可能導(dǎo)致商界領(lǐng)袖被全盤妖魔化,,而另一方面這些商界領(lǐng)袖則可能完全漠視占領(lǐng)運(yùn)動(dòng)的訴求,。這是一切可能性中最糟糕的結(jié)果。雙方都心懷憤怒與怨恨,,意味著彼此只會(huì)互相訓(xùn)斥和嘲諷,,而不是試圖傾聽對(duì)方。

????商界領(lǐng)袖們,,即著名的1%,,不要一看到示威標(biāo)語(yǔ)牌上那些漫無(wú)邊際、有時(shí)甚至欠妥的訴求和抗議,,就馬上否定整個(gè)運(yùn)動(dòng),。事實(shí)上,我們的任務(wù)是要對(duì)這場(chǎng)抗議運(yùn)動(dòng)進(jìn)行分析,,理解支撐這場(chǎng)運(yùn)動(dòng)的合理訴求本質(zhì)是什么,,努力拿出平息抗議的完美方案,。

????換言之,我們得承認(rèn),,有些示威者的訴求不無(wú)道理,。華爾街(以及華盛頓)所作的一些決定確實(shí)造成了整個(gè)世界大規(guī)模的金融震蕩。雖然高盛(Goldman Sachs)的銀行家們和美國(guó)國(guó)際集團(tuán)(AIG)的交易員們做出的一些決定把我們?nèi)舆M(jìn)了全球性經(jīng)濟(jì)衰退,,但這并不一定意味著華爾街已經(jīng)不可救藥,。問(wèn)題不在于華爾街違反規(guī)則中飽私囊,而在于這些規(guī)則本身就一無(wú)是處,。

????The Occupy Wall Street movement has generated a slew of questions from those outside the occupying ranks: Who are these people? What do they really want? Which city will be next? How will our public officials respond? And as the protests have stretched well into their second month, when will it all end? These questions represent an understandable attempt to make sense of a complex, diffuse and divisive movement. They attempt to explain what is happening. But they aren't the questions we really need to ask. Instead, we should be asking why it is happening. And more importantly, we should be asking what we can learn it.

????This isn't an easy leap for business leaders. After all, we're the enemy here. On its website, Occupy Wall Street sets its raison d'être as follows:

????"#OWS is fighting back against the corrosive power of major banks and multinational corporations over the democratic process, and the role of Wall Street in creating an economic collapse that has caused the greatest recession in generations." It goes on: "The movement is inspired by popular uprisings in Egypt and Tunisia, and aims to expose how the richest 1% of people are writing the rules of an unfair global economy that is foreclosing on our future."

????There it is. It is the 99% versus the 1%, the rest-of-us against the richest-of-us. This framing sets the two groups in complete opposition. It has the potential to lead to the wholesale demonization of our business leaders on the one hand and the utter dismissal of the arguments of the occupiers by those very leaders on the other. This is the worst possible outcome. Anger and resentment on both sides mean the two groups shout at and ridicule one another, rather than attempting to listen to the arguments on the other side.

????Business leaders, the famous 1%, need to resist the urge to dismiss the whole movement based on the scattershot and at times ill-conceived nature of the arguments on the placards. Our task is instead to parse the protest, understand the nature of the legitimate complaints that underpin the movement and to attempt to create smart remedies to those complaints.

????In other words, we need to acknowledge that some of these protesters have a point. Decisions made on Wall Street (and in the City) have indeed caused massive financial disruption around the world. But while the bankers at Goldman Sachs (GS) and the traders at AIG (AIG) made decisions that helped tip us into a global recession, it does not necessarily follow that Wall Street is irredeemable. The problem isn't that Wall Street broke the rules to their own benefit, it's that the rules themselves are unhelpful.







更多




最佳評(píng)論

@關(guān)子臨: 自信也許會(huì)壓倒聰明,演技的好壞也許會(huì)壓倒腦力的強(qiáng)弱,,好領(lǐng)導(dǎo)就是循循善誘的人,,不獨(dú)裁,而有見地,,能讓人心悅誠(chéng)服,。    參加討論>>
@DuoDuopa:彼得原理,是美國(guó)學(xué)者勞倫斯彼得在對(duì)組織中人員晉升的相關(guān)現(xiàn)象研究后得出的一個(gè)結(jié)論:在各種組織中,,由于習(xí)慣于對(duì)在某個(gè)等級(jí)上稱職的人員進(jìn)行晉升提拔,,因而雇員總是趨向于晉升到其不稱職的地位。    參加討論>>
@Bruce的森林:正念,,應(yīng)該可以解釋為專注當(dāng)下的事情,,而不去想過(guò)去這件事是怎么做的,這件事將來(lái)會(huì)怎樣,。一方面,,這種理念可以幫助員工排除雜念,把注意力集中在工作本身,,減少壓力,,提高創(chuàng)造力。另一方面,,這不失為提高員工工作效率的好方法,。可能后者是各大BOSS們更看重的吧,。    參加討論>>


Copyright ? 2012財(cái)富出版社有限公司,。 版權(quán)所有,未經(jīng)書面許可,,任何機(jī)構(gòu)不得全部或部分轉(zhuǎn)載,。
《財(cái)富》(中文版)及網(wǎng)站內(nèi)容的版權(quán)屬于時(shí)代公司(Time Inc.),,并經(jīng)過(guò)時(shí)代公司許可由香港中詢有限公司出版和發(fā)布。
深入財(cái)富中文網(wǎng)

雜志

·   當(dāng)期雜志
·   申請(qǐng)雜志贈(zèng)閱
·   特約???/font>
·   廣告商

活動(dòng)

·   科技頭腦風(fēng)暴
·   2013財(cái)富全球論壇
·   財(cái)富CEO峰會(huì)

關(guān)于我們

·   公司介紹
·   訂閱查詢
·   版權(quán)聲明
·   隱私政策
·   廣告業(yè)務(wù)
·   合作伙伴
行業(yè)

·   能源
·   醫(yī)藥
·   航空和運(yùn)輸
·   傳媒與文化
·   工業(yè)與采礦
·   房地產(chǎn)
·   汽車
·   消費(fèi)品
·   金融
·   科技
頻道

·   管理
·   技術(shù)
·   商業(yè)
·   理財(cái)
·   職場(chǎng)
·   生活
·   視頻
·   博客

工具

·     微博
·     社區(qū)
·     RSS訂閱
內(nèi)容精華

·   500強(qiáng)
·   專欄
·   封面報(bào)道
·   創(chuàng)業(yè)
·   特寫
·   前沿
·   CEO訪談
博客

·   四不像
·   劉聰
·   東8時(shí)區(qū)
·   章勱聞
·   公司治理觀察
·   東山豹尉
·   山??纯?/font>
·   明心堂主
榜單

·   世界500強(qiáng)排行榜
·   中國(guó)500強(qiáng)排行榜
·   美國(guó)500強(qiáng)
·   最受贊賞的中國(guó)公司
·   中國(guó)5大適宜退休的城市
·   年度中國(guó)商人
·   50位商界女強(qiáng)人
·   100家增長(zhǎng)最快的公司
·   40位40歲以下的商業(yè)精英
·   100家最適宜工作的公司