
? 無論是投資銀行,、分析師還是經(jīng)濟學家,,金融界普遍認為,在唐納德·特朗普總統(tǒng)所謂的“解放日”到來前,,加征關(guān)稅將帶來負面沖擊,。
經(jīng)濟學家正在調(diào)高經(jīng)濟衰退概率,投資者對所謂“解放日”的加征關(guān)稅憂心忡忡,,但也有市場觸底的說法浮現(xiàn),。4月2日,唐納德·特朗普總統(tǒng)將兌現(xiàn)承諾,,實施對等關(guān)稅政策。
Fundstrat公司聯(lián)合創(chuàng)始人湯姆·李周一在接受CNBC采訪時表示,,市場可能已具備本周觸底的“恰當條件”,。湯姆·李因近期準確預測股市走勢而聲名鵲起。他認為,,若市場觸底,,將釋放積極信號,即最慘烈的拋售階段或已結(jié)束,,為市場反彈掃清道路,。
事實上,周一早盤美股雖一度下挫,,但隨后大幅收窄跌幅,,道指甚至翻紅。
李指出,,當前投資者主要擔憂4月2日加征關(guān)稅的具體影響,、是否會對經(jīng)濟造成沖擊以及特朗普政府的其他政策走向。他補充道,,市場已處于超賣狀態(tài),,投資者正在降低風險敞口。
李表示:“對人們來說,,這是一個漫長的等待,,畢竟還有三天時間,,而且人們擔心這三天可能每天都會下跌2%?!?/p>
但他認為美國經(jīng)濟終將平穩(wěn)過渡,,并將當前形勢與英國脫歐進行對比。雖然英國脫離歐盟初期引發(fā)震蕩,,股市最終迎來反彈,。而目前美國經(jīng)濟存在扭曲現(xiàn)象。消費者在關(guān)稅生效前搶購葡萄酒和汽車,,這種超前消費不利于價格穩(wěn)定,。
與此同時,華爾街愈發(fā)擔憂關(guān)稅可能引發(fā)經(jīng)濟衰退,。
上周日,,穆迪(Moody’s)首席經(jīng)濟學家馬克·扎蒂將今年美國陷入經(jīng)濟衰退的概率從之前預測的15%上調(diào)至40%。他指責特朗普關(guān)稅政策引發(fā)的貿(mào)易戰(zhàn)升級,,以及埃隆·馬斯克領(lǐng)導的政府效率部所開展的裁員,,是導致通脹頑固及消費者信心下滑的罪魁禍首。
他在X上發(fā)文稱,,即將生效的對等關(guān)稅只會讓情況變得更糟糕,。他寫道:“只要關(guān)稅與政府效率部削減開支的舉措持續(xù)加碼,經(jīng)濟衰退概率就會隨之提高,?!?/p>
他并非唯一一個持這種觀點的人。高盛(Goldman Sachs)在上周日發(fā)布的研究報告中指出,,美國GDP連續(xù)兩個季度萎縮的概率為35%,。該投行之前預測的衰退風險概率為20%。
該投行同樣將此歸咎于關(guān)稅,,因為關(guān)稅對可支配收入和消費者支出產(chǎn)生類似稅收的影響,,而且往往會加劇市場波動。當企業(yè)面臨額外稅負時,,通常會將成本轉(zhuǎn)嫁給消費者,,這正是關(guān)稅被認為具有通脹效應(yīng)的原因,也是為什么有智庫直言關(guān)稅是“讓美國人生活水平下降的原因”,。
摩根大通(JPMorgan)在3月28日的報告中表示,,美國經(jīng)濟陷入衰退的概率為40%,因為在預估11%的實際關(guān)稅稅率下,,經(jīng)濟將呈現(xiàn)低增長與高通脹并存的局面,。該投行特別指出,所謂的“解放日”并不會為2025年的貿(mào)易戰(zhàn)畫上句號。
汽車關(guān)稅尤其牽動分析師的神經(jīng),。特朗普擬對進口汽車及零部件征收25%的關(guān)稅,。雖然理論上“美國制造”車輛不受影響,但一位分析師指出,,完全在美國本土生產(chǎn)的汽車并不存在,。
韋德布什(Wedbush)分析師丹·艾夫斯在周一早間發(fā)布的一份報告中警告稱,汽車關(guān)稅措施將是“汽車行業(yè)的滅頂之災”,。他估計美國消費者購買普通汽車的成本將增加5,000至10,000美元,,全行業(yè)年增成本將逾千億美元。艾夫斯寫道:“所謂所有零部件在美國制造的美國汽車制造商純屬虛構(gòu),,實現(xiàn)這個概念需要多年時間,。”
美國銀行(Bank of America)周一的報告呼應(yīng)了這種擔憂,,直言不諱地聲稱“汽車關(guān)稅有百害而無一利”,,所謂“創(chuàng)造就業(yè)”的說法根本經(jīng)不起嚴謹經(jīng)濟理論的考驗。
房地產(chǎn)行業(yè)同樣對關(guān)稅憂心忡忡,。繼鋼鋁關(guān)稅后,,木材可能成為特朗普的下一個目標。這些都是建造房屋的原材料,。建筑商估算,,關(guān)稅可能使每套住宅的成本增加9,000美元??紤]到當前房地產(chǎn)市場因可負擔性惡化和“利率鎖定效應(yīng)”陷入疫情后的停滯期,,許多購房者已無力承受再一次的成本上漲。(財富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:劉進龍
審校:汪皓
? 無論是投資銀行,、分析師還是經(jīng)濟學家,金融界普遍認為,,在唐納德·特朗普總統(tǒng)所謂的“解放日”到來前,,加征關(guān)稅將帶來負面沖擊。
經(jīng)濟學家正在調(diào)高經(jīng)濟衰退概率,,投資者對所謂“解放日”的加征關(guān)稅憂心忡忡,,但也有市場觸底的說法浮現(xiàn)。4月2日,,唐納德·特朗普總統(tǒng)將兌現(xiàn)承諾,,實施對等關(guān)稅政策。
Fundstrat公司聯(lián)合創(chuàng)始人湯姆·李周一在接受CNBC采訪時表示,,市場可能已具備本周觸底的“恰當條件”,。湯姆·李因近期準確預測股市走勢而聲名鵲起。他認為,若市場觸底,,將釋放積極信號,,即最慘烈的拋售階段或已結(jié)束,為市場反彈掃清道路,。
事實上,,周一早盤美股雖一度下挫,但隨后大幅收窄跌幅,,道指甚至翻紅,。
李指出,當前投資者主要擔憂4月2日加征關(guān)稅的具體影響,、是否會對經(jīng)濟造成沖擊以及特朗普政府的其他政策走向,。他補充道,市場已處于超賣狀態(tài),,投資者正在降低風險敞口,。
李表示:“對人們來說,這是一個漫長的等待,,畢竟還有三天時間,,而且人們擔心這三天可能每天都會下跌2%?!?/p>
但他認為美國經(jīng)濟終將平穩(wěn)過渡,,并將當前形勢與英國脫歐進行對比。雖然英國脫離歐盟初期引發(fā)震蕩,,股市最終迎來反彈,。而目前美國經(jīng)濟存在扭曲現(xiàn)象。消費者在關(guān)稅生效前搶購葡萄酒和汽車,,這種超前消費不利于價格穩(wěn)定,。
與此同時,華爾街愈發(fā)擔憂關(guān)稅可能引發(fā)經(jīng)濟衰退,。
上周日,,穆迪(Moody’s)首席經(jīng)濟學家馬克·扎蒂將今年美國陷入經(jīng)濟衰退的概率從之前預測的15%上調(diào)至40%。他指責特朗普關(guān)稅政策引發(fā)的貿(mào)易戰(zhàn)升級,,以及埃隆·馬斯克領(lǐng)導的政府效率部所開展的裁員,,是導致通脹頑固及消費者信心下滑的罪魁禍首。
他在X上發(fā)文稱,,即將生效的對等關(guān)稅只會讓情況變得更糟糕,。他寫道:“只要關(guān)稅與政府效率部削減開支的舉措持續(xù)加碼,經(jīng)濟衰退概率就會隨之提高,?!?/p>
他并非唯一一個持這種觀點的人。高盛(Goldman Sachs)在上周日發(fā)布的研究報告中指出,美國GDP連續(xù)兩個季度萎縮的概率為35%,。該投行之前預測的衰退風險概率為20%,。
該投行同樣將此歸咎于關(guān)稅,因為關(guān)稅對可支配收入和消費者支出產(chǎn)生類似稅收的影響,,而且往往會加劇市場波動,。當企業(yè)面臨額外稅負時,通常會將成本轉(zhuǎn)嫁給消費者,,這正是關(guān)稅被認為具有通脹效應(yīng)的原因,,也是為什么有智庫直言關(guān)稅是“讓美國人生活水平下降的原因”。
摩根大通(JPMorgan)在3月28日的報告中表示,,美國經(jīng)濟陷入衰退的概率為40%,,因為在預估11%的實際關(guān)稅稅率下,經(jīng)濟將呈現(xiàn)低增長與高通脹并存的局面,。該投行特別指出,,所謂的“解放日”并不會為2025年的貿(mào)易戰(zhàn)畫上句號。
汽車關(guān)稅尤其牽動分析師的神經(jīng),。特朗普擬對進口汽車及零部件征收25%的關(guān)稅,。雖然理論上“美國制造”車輛不受影響,但一位分析師指出,,完全在美國本土生產(chǎn)的汽車并不存在,。
韋德布什(Wedbush)分析師丹·艾夫斯在周一早間發(fā)布的一份報告中警告稱,汽車關(guān)稅措施將是“汽車行業(yè)的滅頂之災”,。他估計美國消費者購買普通汽車的成本將增加5,000至10,000美元,,全行業(yè)年增成本將逾千億美元。艾夫斯寫道:“所謂所有零部件在美國制造的美國汽車制造商純屬虛構(gòu),,實現(xiàn)這個概念需要多年時間,。”
美國銀行(Bank of America)周一的報告呼應(yīng)了這種擔憂,,直言不諱地聲稱“汽車關(guān)稅有百害而無一利”,,所謂“創(chuàng)造就業(yè)”的說法根本經(jīng)不起嚴謹經(jīng)濟理論的考驗。
房地產(chǎn)行業(yè)同樣對關(guān)稅憂心忡忡,。繼鋼鋁關(guān)稅后,木材可能成為特朗普的下一個目標,。這些都是建造房屋的原材料,。建筑商估算,關(guān)稅可能使每套住宅的成本增加9,000美元,??紤]到當前房地產(chǎn)市場因可負擔性惡化和“利率鎖定效應(yīng)”陷入疫情后的停滯期,許多購房者已無力承受再一次的成本上漲。(財富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:劉進龍
審校:汪皓
? Whether it be investment banks, analysts, or economists, the finance world mostly agrees that tariffs are bad news ahead of what President Donald Trump has called “l(fā)iberation day.”
Economists are raising their recession odds, and investors are worried about tariffs on so-called “l(fā)iberation day,” but there’s talk of a market bottom. Welcome to the week of April 2: the day president Donald Trump will deliver on his promise to impose reciprocal dollar-for-dollar tariffs.
Fundstrat’s Tom Lee suggested on CNBC Monday that markets could have the “right pieces” for a bottom this week. The cofounder of Fundstrat has earned a reputation for his recent, correct stock-market forecasts, and his call for a bottom would be a bullish signal that the worst of the selloff may be over, clearing the way for a rebound.
In fact, after stocks initially sank early Monday, they pared losses sharply, and the Dow even turned positive.
For now, investors are worried about what tariffs will look like on April 2, whether they’ll hurt the economy, and other policies coming from the Trump administration, Lee said. Markets are oversold and investors are de-risking, he added.
“It’s an interminable wait for people because it is still three days, and they’re fearful we could have three days down 2%,” Lee said.
But he thinks the U.S. will come out of this okay, comparing the present situation to Brexit, when the United Kingdom withdrew from the European Union but eventually saw stocks rally. Still, there is distortion in the U.S. economy at the moment. People are buying wine and cars before tariffs, he said, and that isn’t great for prices.
Meanwhile, Wall Street increasingly suspects tariffs could send the economy into a downturn.
On Sunday, Moody’s chief economist Mark Zandi raised his recession odds. He now sees a 40% chance that a recession will occur this year; he previously suspected there was a 15% chance. Zandi blamed an intensifying trade war from Trump’s tariffs and layoffs from Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency for stubborn inflation and sliding consumer sentiment.
The coming reciprocal tariffs will only worsen things, Zandi said on X. “As long as the tariffs and DOGE cuts continue to mount, so too will the odds of recession,” he wrote.
He isn’t the only one to see a greater chance of a recession. Goldman Sachs said there is a 35% chance that gross domestic product could contract for two straight quarters, in a research note released Sunday. Earlier, the investment bank only saw a 20% risk of a recession.
Tariffs are again to blame because of their tax-like effect on disposable income and consumer spending, plus their tendency to push markets around, the bank said. When businesses face an extra tax, they tend to pass that cost onto consumers, which is why tariffs are considered inflationary—and why one think tank believes they are “a recipe for making Americans worse off.”
JPMorgan said there’s a 40% probability that the economy falls into a recession this year because it sees lower growth and higher inflation on the back of an estimated 11% effective tariff rate, the bank said in a note dated March 28. Not to mention, the bank does not believe “l(fā)iberation day” will close the 2025 trade war chapter.
Auto tariffs, specifically, are on analysts’ minds. Trump set a 25% tariff on foreign-made cars and parts. The levies won’t hurt cars made in America, but according to one analyst there is no such thing as a car completely made in the U.S.
So the car tariff would be “a back breaker and Armageddon for the auto industry,” Wedbush analyst Dan Ives wrote in a note published Monday morning. He estimated the typical car would be $5,000 to $10,000 more costly for an American consumer since the auto industry would incur $100 billion more in costs each year. “The concept of a U.S. car maker with parts all from the U.S. is a fictional tale that does not exist and [it] would take years to make this concept a reality,” Ives wrote.
In a note published Monday, Bank of America echoed Ives and many others, bluntly claiming “auto tariffs are bad,” and that the idea that they’ll create more jobs doesn’t pass the test of “sound economic theory.”
The housing world is concerned about tariffs too. Trump placed a tariff on steel and aluminum, and lumber could be next. All are used in the construction of homes. Builders estimate that levies could add an extra $9,000 to the price tag on every home. Considering housing is at a post-pandemic standstill because of deteriorated affordability and the lock-in effect, many people couldn’t bear even one more increase in cost.