時間來到了2050年,,由于降雨的消失,,青尼羅河幾乎干涸,而這些降雨的源頭在歷史上一直來自于剛果盆地雨林貢獻(xiàn)的大氣河流,。薩赫爾,、非洲之角和撒哈拉北部近5億人口如今走上了遷徙之路,以遠(yuǎn)離干旱,、饑荒和水資源爭奪戰(zhàn)帶來的災(zāi)難性影響,,而這一切歸咎于數(shù)十年前人們對失控的災(zāi)難性氣候變化聽之任之。盡管剛果盆地重要的生態(tài)意義有據(jù)可查,,然而在剛果盆地這個非洲之心,、地球第二大雨林因人類活動、森林砍伐和氣候變化遭到大面積破壞時,,我們卻在袖手旁觀,。事實證明,失去地球第二大肺對很多生態(tài)系統(tǒng),、人口甚至是整個國家來說是致命的,,會影響到整個大陸甚至整個地球的安全和穩(wěn)定性。
有人可能會覺得上述景象是危言聳聽,,或者過于遙遠(yuǎn)而不切實際,。然而,科學(xué)認(rèn)為,,由于我們對氣候變化無動于衷,、視而不見,我們正加速邁向這個可能出現(xiàn)的未來,。
我們必須盡快培養(yǎng)新一代的非洲科學(xué)家,,以研究、記錄,、監(jiān)測和解釋形成剛果盆地重要生態(tài)系統(tǒng)的復(fù)雜生態(tài)過程,,以及當(dāng)代人類活動對盆地雨林自身存在的威脅。
25年錢,,巴西在亞馬遜流域發(fā)起了大規(guī)模生物大氣圈研究(LBA),。該項目由巴西人主導(dǎo),得到了國際社會高達(dá)1億美元的資金支持,。該項目涉及1700名參與者,其中990名都是巴西人,。它顛覆了我們對亞馬遜雨林及其對地球系統(tǒng)影響的理解,。該項目最偉大的傳承之一就是打造了一支巴西科學(xué)家隊伍。受此影響,,巴西如今是全球公認(rèn)的熱帶雨林監(jiān)測領(lǐng)域強國,,而且在熱帶雨林科學(xué)方面處于領(lǐng)先地位,。亞馬遜科學(xué)專委會便源于這項動議,它涵蓋280名科學(xué)家,,他們在格拉斯哥第26屆聯(lián)合國氣候變化大會(COP26)召開前夕發(fā)布了標(biāo)志性的《2021亞馬遜評估報告》(Amazon Assessment Report),。
雖然亞馬遜備受國際捐贈者的重視,但地球第二大雨林剛果盆地在很大程度上遭到了忽視,。盡管得不到足夠的重視和國際捐贈者的資助,,但剛果本土前不久涌現(xiàn)出了一批科學(xué)家。
在剛果盆地保護(hù)和可持續(xù)管理方面并非沒有相關(guān)資金,,例如中非森林動議(CAFI)和剛果盆地森林聯(lián)盟,但這些資金并不足以支撐相關(guān)的科研費用,,而這些科研對于我們理解生態(tài)系統(tǒng)和培養(yǎng)生態(tài)系統(tǒng)管理能力至關(guān)重要,。長期數(shù)據(jù)庫和研究站少之又少,即便有,,這些機構(gòu)始終難以按年度籌措到哪怕并不算多的資金,。
得益于英國利茲大學(xué)(University of Leeds)西蒙?路易斯發(fā)起的永久植物保護(hù)區(qū)網(wǎng)絡(luò)AFRITRON,以及包括Lopé,、Epulu,、Kibale和Budongo在內(nèi)的幾家重要工作站(盡管沒有得到普遍關(guān)注,但一些有毅力的研究員堅持耕耘了幾十年),,我們拿到了一些證據(jù),,能夠證明剛果盆地在碳匯方面的作用。確實,,盡管剛果盆地只有亞馬遜面積的三分之一,,但它留存了近40%的碳儲量,而且其森林對于氣候變化的耐受度要高于亞馬遜南部雨林,。如今,,雖然其面積較小,但代表的碳匯要大得多,。
一些不怎么全面的零碎初期研究顯示,,由剛果盆地雨林提供的生態(tài)系統(tǒng)服務(wù)對非洲和全球的穩(wěn)定至關(guān)重要,例如其葉片蒸發(fā)帶來的冷卻效應(yīng),,以及飄至埃塞俄比亞高地和薩赫爾的大氣河,,它們產(chǎn)生的降水不僅補充了青尼羅河,也為埃及提供了灌溉用水,。
別再犯錯了:如果我們失去剛果盆地雨林,,全球應(yīng)對氣候變化的舉措將倒退15—20年。我們還將失去水源,,這個由非洲綠色心臟供給的命脈,,而且在未來數(shù)十年之后,,其后果將由數(shù)億氣候難民來承擔(dān)。
簡而言之,,沒有了剛果盆地雨林,,非洲將成為不毛之地,或至少這是根據(jù)現(xiàn)有不充分的證據(jù)推斷出的結(jié)果,。
在擔(dān)任剛果盆地科學(xué)專委會特別專員(SPCB)這一新職務(wù)之后,,我的任務(wù)就是敲響警鐘。我們必須在科學(xué)家,、捐贈者和決策者之間架設(shè)更多的橋梁,。SPCB與我們的姊妹動議剛果盆地科學(xué)動議需要您的支持和投資。如果要維持全世界生態(tài)的穩(wěn)定,,我們必須更好地了解和保護(hù)這一關(guān)鍵的生態(tài)系統(tǒng),。這個系統(tǒng)是8000萬人的家園,而且進(jìn)一步維系著周邊地區(qū)3億非洲農(nóng)民的生計,。
那些研究高空拍攝衛(wèi)星圖片的發(fā)達(dá)國家研究員無法為我們提供有關(guān)雨林的深入了解,。我們需要剛果盆地科學(xué)家實地考察,深入森林,,從土著居民那里學(xué)習(xí),,全面地掌握植物、動物,、人,、氣候、水文和地質(zhì)之間復(fù)雜的互動,。
亞馬遜科學(xué)專委會給了我們很大的啟發(fā),,我們期待向其學(xué)習(xí)并與之建立緊密的關(guān)系。在SCPB參與第三十屆聯(lián)合國氣候大會之時,,我們的首個評估報告將準(zhǔn)備就緒,。被譽為雨林氣候大會的COP30將于2025年在貝倫市舉行。
有鑒于地球之肺受到了生存威脅,,我們必須行動起來,,發(fā)起持久的變革。(財富中文網(wǎng))
本文作者李?懷特(Lee White)教授曾擔(dān)任加蓬共和國水務(wù),、森林,、海洋和環(huán)境部長,是新任命的剛果盆地科學(xué)專委會特別專員,。
譯者:馮豐
審校:夏林
時間來到了2050年,,由于降雨的消失,青尼羅河幾乎干涸,,而這些降雨的源頭在歷史上一直來自于剛果盆地雨林貢獻(xiàn)的大氣河流,。薩赫爾、非洲之角和撒哈拉北部近5億人口如今走上了遷徙之路,,以遠(yuǎn)離干旱,、饑荒和水資源爭奪戰(zhàn)帶來的災(zāi)難性影響,而這一切歸咎于數(shù)十年前人們對失控的災(zāi)難性氣候變化聽之任之,。盡管剛果盆地重要的生態(tài)意義有據(jù)可查,,然而在剛果盆地這個非洲之心、地球第二大雨林因人類活動,、森林砍伐和氣候變化遭到大面積破壞時,,我們卻在袖手旁觀。事實證明,,失去地球第二大肺對很多生態(tài)系統(tǒng),、人口甚至是整個國家來說是致命的,會影響到整個大陸甚至整個地球的安全和穩(wěn)定性,。
有人可能會覺得上述景象是危言聳聽,,或者過于遙遠(yuǎn)而不切實際。然而,,科學(xué)認(rèn)為,,由于我們對氣候變化無動于衷、視而不見,,我們正加速邁向這個可能出現(xiàn)的未來,。
我們必須盡快培養(yǎng)新一代的非洲科學(xué)家,以研究,、記錄,、監(jiān)測和解釋形成剛果盆地重要生態(tài)系統(tǒng)的復(fù)雜生態(tài)過程,以及當(dāng)代人類活動對盆地雨林自身存在的威脅,。
25年錢,,巴西在亞馬遜流域發(fā)起了大規(guī)模生物大氣圈研究(LBA)。該項目由巴西人主導(dǎo),,得到了國際社會高達(dá)1億美元的資金支持,。該項目涉及1700名參與者,其中990名都是巴西人,。它顛覆了我們對亞馬遜雨林及其對地球系統(tǒng)影響的理解,。該項目最偉大的傳承之一就是打造了一支巴西科學(xué)家隊伍。受此影響,,巴西如今是全球公認(rèn)的熱帶雨林監(jiān)測領(lǐng)域強國,,而且在熱帶雨林科學(xué)方面處于領(lǐng)先地位。亞馬遜科學(xué)專委會便源于這項動議,,它涵蓋280名科學(xué)家,,他們在格拉斯哥第26屆聯(lián)合國氣候變化大會(COP26)召開前夕發(fā)布了標(biāo)志性的《2021亞馬遜評估報告》(Amazon Assessment Report),。
雖然亞馬遜備受國際捐贈者的重視,但地球第二大雨林剛果盆地在很大程度上遭到了忽視,。盡管得不到足夠的重視和國際捐贈者的資助,,但剛果本土前不久涌現(xiàn)出了一批科學(xué)家。
在剛果盆地保護(hù)和可持續(xù)管理方面并非沒有相關(guān)資金,,例如中非森林動議(CAFI)和剛果盆地森林聯(lián)盟,,但這些資金并不足以支撐相關(guān)的科研費用,而這些科研對于我們理解生態(tài)系統(tǒng)和培養(yǎng)生態(tài)系統(tǒng)管理能力至關(guān)重要,。長期數(shù)據(jù)庫和研究站少之又少,,即便有,這些機構(gòu)始終難以按年度籌措到哪怕并不算多的資金,。
得益于英國利茲大學(xué)(University of Leeds)西蒙?路易斯發(fā)起的永久植物保護(hù)區(qū)網(wǎng)絡(luò)AFRITRON,,以及包括Lopé、Epulu,、Kibale和Budongo在內(nèi)的幾家重要工作站(盡管沒有得到普遍關(guān)注,,但一些有毅力的研究員堅持耕耘了幾十年),我們拿到了一些證據(jù),,能夠證明剛果盆地在碳匯方面的作用,。確實,盡管剛果盆地只有亞馬遜面積的三分之一,,但它留存了近40%的碳儲量,,而且其森林對于氣候變化的耐受度要高于亞馬遜南部雨林。如今,,雖然其面積較小,,但代表的碳匯要大得多。
一些不怎么全面的零碎初期研究顯示,,由剛果盆地雨林提供的生態(tài)系統(tǒng)服務(wù)對非洲和全球的穩(wěn)定至關(guān)重要,,例如其葉片蒸發(fā)帶來的冷卻效應(yīng),以及飄至埃塞俄比亞高地和薩赫爾的大氣河,,它們產(chǎn)生的降水不僅補充了青尼羅河,,也為埃及提供了灌溉用水。
別再犯錯了:如果我們失去剛果盆地雨林,,全球應(yīng)對氣候變化的舉措將倒退15—20年,。我們還將失去水源,這個由非洲綠色心臟供給的命脈,,而且在未來數(shù)十年之后,,其后果將由數(shù)億氣候難民來承擔(dān)。
簡而言之,沒有了剛果盆地雨林,,非洲將成為不毛之地,,或至少這是根據(jù)現(xiàn)有不充分的證據(jù)推斷出的結(jié)果。
在擔(dān)任剛果盆地科學(xué)專委會特別專員(SPCB)這一新職務(wù)之后,,我的任務(wù)就是敲響警鐘,。我們必須在科學(xué)家、捐贈者和決策者之間架設(shè)更多的橋梁,。SPCB與我們的姊妹動議剛果盆地科學(xué)動議需要您的支持和投資。如果要維持全世界生態(tài)的穩(wěn)定,,我們必須更好地了解和保護(hù)這一關(guān)鍵的生態(tài)系統(tǒng),。這個系統(tǒng)是8000萬人的家園,而且進(jìn)一步維系著周邊地區(qū)3億非洲農(nóng)民的生計,。
那些研究高空拍攝衛(wèi)星圖片的發(fā)達(dá)國家研究員無法為我們提供有關(guān)雨林的深入了解,。我們需要剛果盆地科學(xué)家實地考察,深入森林,,從土著居民那里學(xué)習(xí),,全面地掌握植物、動物,、人,、氣候、水文和地質(zhì)之間復(fù)雜的互動,。
亞馬遜科學(xué)專委會給了我們很大的啟發(fā),,我們期待向其學(xué)習(xí)并與之建立緊密的關(guān)系。在SCPB參與第三十屆聯(lián)合國氣候大會之時,,我們的首個評估報告將準(zhǔn)備就緒,。被譽為雨林氣候大會的COP30將于2025年在貝倫市舉行。
有鑒于地球之肺受到了生存威脅,,我們必須行動起來,,發(fā)起持久的變革。(財富中文網(wǎng))
本文作者李?懷特(Lee White)教授曾擔(dān)任加蓬共和國水務(wù),、森林,、海洋和環(huán)境部長,是新任命的剛果盆地科學(xué)專委會特別專員,。
譯者:馮豐
審校:夏林
It is the year 2050. The Blue Nile has almost run dry, starved of the rains at its source that were historically sustained by atmospheric rivers flowing from the Congo Basin rainforests. Nearly half a billion people across the Sahel, the Horn of Africa, and north of the Sahara are now on the move, fleeing the devastating impact of droughts, famine, and water wars, the result of allowing unmitigated climate change to get out of control decades earlier. Despite the evidence of their critical ecological importance, we stood by while the Congo Basin, the heart of Africa, the Earth’s second great rainforest, was decimated by human activity, deforestation, and climate change. Losing the earth’s second lung proved fatal for many ecosystems, human populations, and even entire nations—shattering the security and stability of the continent and indeed the whole planet.
This may sound too alarmist or far-fetched to be true—but science suggests that we are hurtling toward this alternate future because of our inactivity and negligence in the face of climate change.
We must urgently develop a generation of African scientists able to study, document, monitor, and explain the complex ecological processes that have structured the vital Congo Basin ecosystem, as well as the threats posed by modern human activities to its very existence.
Twenty-five years ago, Brazil launched the Large-Scale Biosphere-Atmosphere experiment in Amazonia (LBA). The program was led by Brazilians and supported by the international community to the tune of $100 million. Involving 1,700 participants, 990 of whom were Brazilians, it revolutionized our understanding of the Amazon rainforest and its role in the Earth system. One of its greatest legacies was the creation of a cadre of Brazilian scientists. As a result, Brazil is now widely acknowledged as the world’s leading nation in tropical forest monitoring and is at the forefront of rainforest science. The Science Panel of the Amazon grew out of this initiative and includes 280 scientists, who published the landmark 2021 Amazon Assessment Report in the lead up to COP 26 in Glasgow.
Whilst the Amazon has attracted huge attention from international donors, the Congo Basin, Earth’s second great rainforest, has been largely neglected. Only now is a cadre of indigenous scientists emerging, despite the context of insufficient attention and funding from international donors.
The funds that do exist for the conservation and sustainable management of the Congo Basin, such as the Central African Forest Initiative (CAFI) or the Congo Basin Forest Partnership, are insufficient to support the science that is critical to our understanding and ability to manage the ecosystem. Very few long-term data bases and research stations exist—and those that do struggle permanently to raise even relatively modest funding on an annual basis.
Thanks to AFRITRON, a network of permanent botanical plots initiated by Professor Simon Lewis at the University of Leeds in the U.K., and a few key long-term sites such as Lopé, Epulu, Kibale, and Budongo, where stubborn researchers have plugged away over decades despite the general lack of interest, we do have some indications of the importance of the Congo Basin as a carbon sink. Indeed, while it is only one-third the area of the Amazon, the Congo Basin contains roughly 40% the carbon stock and its forests are proving more resilient to climate change than the southern Amazon. Today, they represent a much larger carbon sink, despite their smaller size.
Incomplete, fragmented, or preliminary studies suggest that the ecosystem services provided by the Congo basin forests, such as the cooling effect of transpiration from their leaves and the atmospheric rivers that flow to the Ethiopian Highlands and the Sahel, generating the rainfall that fills the Blue Nile and irrigates Egypt, are critical to African and global stability.
Make no mistake: If we lose the Congo Basin forests, the global fight against climate change will be set back by 15 to 20 years. We would also lose the water, the lifeblood of Africa that is pumped out of its green heart—and the consequences will be counted in hundreds of millions of climate refugees in the coming decades.
Put simply, Africa is not viable without the Congo Basin forests—or at least that is the indication of the scant evidence that exists.
In my new role as the Special Envoy of the Science Panel for the Congo Basin (SPCB), it is my duty to sound the alarm. We must build more bridges between scientists, donors, and policy makers. The SPCB, along with our sister initiative, the Science Initiative for the Congo Basin, need your support and investment. If our world is to remain ecologically stable, we have to better understand and preserve this critical ecosystem, which is home to 80 million people and supports life for a further 300 million rural Africans in surrounding regions.
The depth of understanding we need will not come from developed nation researchers studying satellite images taken from afar. We need Congo Basin scientists, on the ground, in the forest, learning from indigenous people and piecing together the complex interactions between plants, animals, people, climate, hydrology, and geology.
We are inspired by and looking to learn from and develop strong links with the Science Panel for the Amazon. By the time the SCPB touches down at COP30, the rainforest COP, which will be held in Belem in 2025, our first assessment report will be ready.
With the world’s lungs under existential threat, we must mobilize to create lasting change.
Professor Lee White is a former Minister of Water, Forests, Sea and Environment of the Gabonese Republic and the newly appointed Special Envoy of the Science Panel for the Congo Basin.