我想看一级黄色片_欧美性爱无遮挡电影_色丁香视频网站中文字幕_视频一区 视频二区 国产,日本三级理论日本电影,午夜不卡免费大片,国产午夜视频在线观看,18禁无遮拦无码国产在线播放,在线视频不卡国产在线视频不卡 ,,欧美一及黄片,日韩国产另类

首頁 500強(qiáng) 活動 榜單 商業(yè) 科技 領(lǐng)導(dǎo)力 專題 品牌中心
雜志訂閱

一家投行的報告認(rèn)為,,零售商將關(guān)店歸咎于“零元購”是在夸大其詞

IRINA IVANOVA
2023-11-03

威廉博萊公司的報告認(rèn)為,雖然疫情之后盜竊犯罪增多,,但最近的“庫存收縮”只是在一定程度上恢復(fù)到了疫情之前的水平。

文本設(shè)置
小號
默認(rèn)
大號
Plus(0條)

過去三年,,美國城市發(fā)生的犯罪潮,,令各地的店主感到不滿。美國零售聯(lián)合會(National Retail Federation)最近呼吁聯(lián)邦政府打擊零售犯罪,。該機(jī)構(gòu)稱“零售商門店內(nèi)發(fā)生的盜竊案達(dá)到前所未有的水平,,而且犯罪日益猖獗,情況變得越來越嚴(yán)重,?!?/p>

沃爾瑪(Walmart)、沃爾格林(Walgreens)和塔吉特(Target)等大型連鎖超市都將關(guān)閉零售店的決定,,歸咎于犯罪呈上升趨勢,。塔吉特最近在五個城市關(guān)閉了九家門店。

但投資銀行威廉博萊公司(William Blair)的分析師在最近的研究報告中指出,,零售商的說法似乎言過其實,。他們表示,與疫情之前相比,,犯罪率確實有所上升,,但這并非唯一的原因。

他們表示:“商店的失竊率升高,,與公司對于盜竊情況的評論和采取的行動,,并不成正比,尤其是為防止犯罪而關(guān)閉門店這種激進(jìn)的做法,。我們必須承認(rèn),,這種情形背后可能隱藏著更多投機(jī)性的動機(jī),。”

恢復(fù)正常

疫情期間,,商品“庫存收縮”大幅下降,,因為很少有人現(xiàn)場購物,而且門店縮短了營業(yè)時間并減少了商品種類,。商品“庫存收縮”是一個零售業(yè)的術(shù)語,,是指因外部和員工盜竊、產(chǎn)品損壞或文件報告錯誤等原因造成的損失,。威廉博萊公司的報告認(rèn)為,,雖然疫情之后盜竊犯罪增多,但最近的“庫存收縮”只是在一定程度上恢復(fù)到了疫情之前的水平,。

據(jù)美國零售聯(lián)合會統(tǒng)計,,去年,庫存收縮在銷售額中的占比為1.6%,,與2019年和2020年持平,高于2021年的1.4%,。威廉·詹姆斯估計,,今年庫存收縮的占比會小幅提高,約為2%,。該投行預(yù)測,,這將是最高峰,他們表示“早已有2023年庫存收縮趨于穩(wěn)定的跡象”,。

總體而言,,在后疫情時期的經(jīng)濟(jì)環(huán)境下,零售商面臨各方面的壓力:備受通脹之苦的消費者變得更加挑剔,,而許多商業(yè)區(qū)的人流量遠(yuǎn)低于疫情之前的水平,,使這些之前熱鬧的商業(yè)區(qū)的門店難以為繼。

威廉博萊公司的報告寫道,,塔吉特就是一個這樣的例子,。總部位于明尼阿波利斯的連鎖超市塔吉特一直在直言不諱地表達(dá)對盜竊犯罪的不滿,,最近計劃關(guān)閉位于紐約,、波特蘭、西雅圖和舊金山灣區(qū)的九家門店,。

塔吉特在9月宣布:“我們無法繼續(xù)經(jīng)營這些門店,,因為盜竊和有組織零售犯罪正在威脅我們的團(tuán)隊和顧客的安全,而且導(dǎo)致公司的經(jīng)營業(yè)績難以為繼,?!彼胤Q,,雖然公司投資了更多監(jiān)控和門店安保人員,但“我們安全,、成功經(jīng)營這些門店依舊面臨基本挑戰(zhàn),。”

然而,,實際犯罪統(tǒng)計數(shù)據(jù)卻指向了另外一個罪魁禍?zhǔn)?。進(jìn)步新聞機(jī)構(gòu)Popular Information分析上個月的數(shù)據(jù)發(fā)現(xiàn),已關(guān)閉的門店公布的犯罪率,,實際上低于附近的其他依舊在營業(yè)的塔吉特門店,。

威廉博萊公司的報告提到了另外一種可能性:塔吉特可能只是關(guān)閉了不盈利的門店,并趁機(jī)將原因歸咎于犯罪,,而不是糟糕的商業(yè)決策,。該連鎖超市之前曾以郊區(qū)購物中心龐大的零售復(fù)合體而著稱。約五年前,,該連鎖超市開始全面推動在商業(yè)區(qū)開建面積更小的門店,,但自從2020年以來它不再公開宣揚(yáng)這是公司的經(jīng)營策略之一。另外一個原因是在線購物的日益流行,。在線購物在幫助零售商盈利的同時,,會侵蝕實體店的銷售額,降低實體店的盈利能力,。事實上,,投資銀行瑞銀(UBS)預(yù)計,在線購物將是未來五年50,000家零售店關(guān)閉的主要原因,。

威廉博萊公司的報告寫道:“塔吉特可能利用庫存收縮掩蓋其他問題,,包括供應(yīng)鏈中斷之后在2022年達(dá)到臨界點的庫存管理不善問題。現(xiàn)在塔吉特為了提高整體利潤率,,正在關(guān)閉業(yè)績不佳的門店,。”

該投行指出:“我們認(rèn)為,,塔吉特等公司可能正在利用當(dāng)前與庫存收縮有關(guān)的描述,,針對業(yè)績落后的業(yè)務(wù)采取更廣泛的措施?!保ㄋ夭⑽椿貜?fù)《財富》雜志就該投行的評估提出的置評請求,。)

三年前,疫情使城市商業(yè)區(qū)變得人煙稀少,,之后許多門店因為顧客減少和租金上漲而關(guān)閉,。遠(yuǎn)程辦公領(lǐng)域的權(quán)威尼古拉斯·布魯姆估計,普通上班族在商業(yè)區(qū)的支出較疫情之前的水平已經(jīng)減少了4,600美元,。威廉博萊公司的報告稱,,今年早些時候,,沃爾瑪關(guān)閉了在芝加哥市的四家門店,雖然并沒有提到犯罪狀況,,但沃爾瑪表示在當(dāng)?shù)亍懊磕晏潛p達(dá)數(shù)千萬美元”,。

“或許我們有些夸大其詞”

不只是塔吉特:早在2021年,《洛杉磯時報》(Los Angeles Times)指出,,零售業(yè)的數(shù)據(jù)習(xí)慣了夸大有組織犯罪的影響,。該媒體發(fā)現(xiàn):“雖然一些零售和執(zhí)法游說機(jī)構(gòu)引用了驚人的數(shù)據(jù),但我們有理由懷疑問題并不像他們說的那么嚴(yán)重或普遍,?!?/p>

零售商沃爾格林就承認(rèn)其對犯罪的擔(dān)憂有些夸張。2021年,,該連鎖店將舊金山多家門店的關(guān)閉歸咎于犯罪率升高,,結(jié)果引發(fā)了對舊金山犯罪狀況的激烈討論,但事后它改變了自己的說法,。

沃爾格林首席財務(wù)官詹姆斯·基霍在1月的投資者電話會議上承認(rèn),,對于犯罪狀況“或許我們?nèi)ツ甑恼f法有些夸大其詞”。

當(dāng)然,,威廉博萊公司并沒有完全低估入店盜竊行為的影響,。該銀行預(yù)測,犯罪依舊是導(dǎo)致零售利潤率下降的多個因素之一,。該銀行稱:“我們看到近期解決有組織零售犯罪的方法有限”,因為無論過去還是現(xiàn)在,,入店盜竊的風(fēng)險相對較低,,而亞馬遜(Amazon)、eBay和Facebook Marketplace等在線轉(zhuǎn)售平臺的流行,,使銷贓變得更容易,,而且有利可圖。

事實上,,該銀行表示,,零售商夸大盜竊行為,目的是刺激政府打擊犯罪,,因為他們自己對此無能為力,,而且他們到目前為止采取的措施,例如給商品上鎖等,,并不受客戶歡迎,,還可能進(jìn)一步降低銷售額。

該銀行的報告中寫道:“政府唯一能做的似乎是在更高層面上打擊[有組織零售犯罪],?!眻蟾嬷杏直硎荆骸斑@將是一個漫長的過程,。”(財富中文網(wǎng))

翻譯:劉進(jìn)龍

審校:汪皓

過去三年,,美國城市發(fā)生的犯罪潮,,令各地的店主感到不滿。美國零售聯(lián)合會(National Retail Federation)最近呼吁聯(lián)邦政府打擊零售犯罪,。該機(jī)構(gòu)稱“零售商門店內(nèi)發(fā)生的盜竊案達(dá)到前所未有的水平,,而且犯罪日益猖獗,情況變得越來越嚴(yán)重,?!?/p>

沃爾瑪(Walmart)、沃爾格林(Walgreens)和塔吉特(Target)等大型連鎖超市都將關(guān)閉零售店的決定,,歸咎于犯罪呈上升趨勢,。塔吉特最近在五個城市關(guān)閉了九家門店。

但投資銀行威廉博萊公司(William Blair)的分析師在最近的研究報告中指出,,零售商的說法似乎言過其實,。他們表示,與疫情之前相比,,犯罪率確實有所上升,,但這并非唯一的原因。

他們表示:“商店的失竊率升高,,與公司對于盜竊情況的評論和采取的行動,,并不成正比,尤其是為防止犯罪而關(guān)閉門店這種激進(jìn)的做法,。我們必須承認(rèn),,這種情形背后可能隱藏著更多投機(jī)性的動機(jī)?!?/p>

恢復(fù)正常

疫情期間,,商品“庫存收縮”大幅下降,因為很少有人現(xiàn)場購物,,而且門店縮短了營業(yè)時間并減少了商品種類,。商品“庫存收縮”是一個零售業(yè)的術(shù)語,是指因外部和員工盜竊,、產(chǎn)品損壞或文件報告錯誤等原因造成的損失,。威廉博萊公司的報告認(rèn)為,雖然疫情之后盜竊犯罪增多,,但最近的“庫存收縮”只是在一定程度上恢復(fù)到了疫情之前的水平,。

據(jù)美國零售聯(lián)合會統(tǒng)計,去年,庫存收縮在銷售額中的占比為1.6%,,與2019年和2020年持平,,高于2021年的1.4%。威廉·詹姆斯估計,,今年庫存收縮的占比會小幅提高,,約為2%。該投行預(yù)測,,這將是最高峰,,他們表示“早已有2023年庫存收縮趨于穩(wěn)定的跡象”。

總體而言,,在后疫情時期的經(jīng)濟(jì)環(huán)境下,,零售商面臨各方面的壓力:備受通脹之苦的消費者變得更加挑剔,而許多商業(yè)區(qū)的人流量遠(yuǎn)低于疫情之前的水平,,使這些之前熱鬧的商業(yè)區(qū)的門店難以為繼。

威廉博萊公司的報告寫道,,塔吉特就是一個這樣的例子??偛课挥诿髂岚⒉ɡ沟倪B鎖超市塔吉特一直在直言不諱地表達(dá)對盜竊犯罪的不滿,,最近計劃關(guān)閉位于紐約,、波特蘭,、西雅圖和舊金山灣區(qū)的九家門店,。

塔吉特在9月宣布:“我們無法繼續(xù)經(jīng)營這些門店,,因為盜竊和有組織零售犯罪正在威脅我們的團(tuán)隊和顧客的安全,,而且導(dǎo)致公司的經(jīng)營業(yè)績難以為繼。”塔吉特稱,,雖然公司投資了更多監(jiān)控和門店安保人員,,但“我們安全,、成功經(jīng)營這些門店依舊面臨基本挑戰(zhàn),?!?/p>

然而,實際犯罪統(tǒng)計數(shù)據(jù)卻指向了另外一個罪魁禍?zhǔn)?。進(jìn)步新聞機(jī)構(gòu)Popular Information分析上個月的數(shù)據(jù)發(fā)現(xiàn),,已關(guān)閉的門店公布的犯罪率,,實際上低于附近的其他依舊在營業(yè)的塔吉特門店,。

威廉博萊公司的報告提到了另外一種可能性:塔吉特可能只是關(guān)閉了不盈利的門店,,并趁機(jī)將原因歸咎于犯罪,,而不是糟糕的商業(yè)決策。該連鎖超市之前曾以郊區(qū)購物中心龐大的零售復(fù)合體而著稱,。約五年前,該連鎖超市開始全面推動在商業(yè)區(qū)開建面積更小的門店,,但自從2020年以來它不再公開宣揚(yáng)這是公司的經(jīng)營策略之一,。另外一個原因是在線購物的日益流行,。在線購物在幫助零售商盈利的同時,,會侵蝕實體店的銷售額,降低實體店的盈利能力,。事實上,,投資銀行瑞銀(UBS)預(yù)計,在線購物將是未來五年50,000家零售店關(guān)閉的主要原因,。

威廉博萊公司的報告寫道:“塔吉特可能利用庫存收縮掩蓋其他問題,,包括供應(yīng)鏈中斷之后在2022年達(dá)到臨界點的庫存管理不善問題?,F(xiàn)在塔吉特為了提高整體利潤率,正在關(guān)閉業(yè)績不佳的門店,?!?/p>

該投行指出:“我們認(rèn)為,,塔吉特等公司可能正在利用當(dāng)前與庫存收縮有關(guān)的描述,針對業(yè)績落后的業(yè)務(wù)采取更廣泛的措施,。”(塔吉特并未回復(fù)《財富》雜志就該投行的評估提出的置評請求,。)

三年前,,疫情使城市商業(yè)區(qū)變得人煙稀少,,之后許多門店因為顧客減少和租金上漲而關(guān)閉,。遠(yuǎn)程辦公領(lǐng)域的權(quán)威尼古拉斯·布魯姆估計,,普通上班族在商業(yè)區(qū)的支出較疫情之前的水平已經(jīng)減少了4,600美元。威廉博萊公司的報告稱,今年早些時候,,沃爾瑪關(guān)閉了在芝加哥市的四家門店,,雖然并沒有提到犯罪狀況,,但沃爾瑪表示在當(dāng)?shù)亍懊磕晏潛p達(dá)數(shù)千萬美元”,。

“或許我們有些夸大其詞”

不只是塔吉特:早在2021年,,《洛杉磯時報》(Los Angeles Times)指出,,零售業(yè)的數(shù)據(jù)習(xí)慣了夸大有組織犯罪的影響,。該媒體發(fā)現(xiàn):“雖然一些零售和執(zhí)法游說機(jī)構(gòu)引用了驚人的數(shù)據(jù),,但我們有理由懷疑問題并不像他們說的那么嚴(yán)重或普遍,?!?/p>

零售商沃爾格林就承認(rèn)其對犯罪的擔(dān)憂有些夸張。2021年,,該連鎖店將舊金山多家門店的關(guān)閉歸咎于犯罪率升高,,結(jié)果引發(fā)了對舊金山犯罪狀況的激烈討論,但事后它改變了自己的說法,。

沃爾格林首席財務(wù)官詹姆斯·基霍在1月的投資者電話會議上承認(rèn),,對于犯罪狀況“或許我們?nèi)ツ甑恼f法有些夸大其詞”,。

當(dāng)然,,威廉博萊公司并沒有完全低估入店盜竊行為的影響。該銀行預(yù)測,,犯罪依舊是導(dǎo)致零售利潤率下降的多個因素之一,。該銀行稱:“我們看到近期解決有組織零售犯罪的方法有限”,因為無論過去還是現(xiàn)在,,入店盜竊的風(fēng)險相對較低,,而亞馬遜(Amazon)、eBay和Facebook Marketplace等在線轉(zhuǎn)售平臺的流行,,使銷贓變得更容易,,而且有利可圖。

事實上,,該銀行表示,,零售商夸大盜竊行為,,目的是刺激政府打擊犯罪,因為他們自己對此無能為力,,而且他們到目前為止采取的措施,例如給商品上鎖等,,并不受客戶歡迎,,還可能進(jìn)一步降低銷售額。

該銀行的報告中寫道:“政府唯一能做的似乎是在更高層面上打擊[有組織零售犯罪],?!眻蟾嬷杏直硎荆骸斑@將是一個漫長的過程,?!保ㄘ敻恢形木W(wǎng))

翻譯:劉進(jìn)龍

審校:汪皓

For the last three years, shopkeepers across America have been up in arms about the alleged crime wave that has gripped the nation’s cities. The National Retail Federation recently called for a federal crackdown on retail crime, saying, “retailers are seeing unprecedented levels of theft coupled with rampant crime in their stores, and the situation is only becoming more dire.”

Major chains including Walmart, Walgreens, and Target have blamed rising crime for their decisions to close retail locations, with Target most recently shuttering nine stores across five cities.

But retailers’ claims are likely exaggerated, analysts at investment bank William Blair wrote in a recent research note. Yes, crime has risen relative to pre-pandemic levels — but that’s not the only thing happening, they wrote.

“[T]he actual increase in rates of theft seemingly does not necessarily correspond to the increase in company commentary and action—particularly one of the more dramatic initiatives to thwart crime, store closures,” they said. “[W]e have to acknowledge potentially ulterior, more opportunistic motives.”

Back to normal

During the pandemic, product “shrink”—the industry term for losses for any reason, including external and employee theft, product damage, or paperwork errors—dropped rapidly as fewer people shopped in-person and stores reduced hours and product selection. While theft has certainly risen since then, part of the recent increase in “shrink” is merely a return to pre-pandemic levels, William Blair noted.

Shrink, as a portion of sales, was 1.6% last year—the same as in 2019 and 2020, and up from 1.4% in 2021, according to the National Retail Federation. This year, William James estimated that shrink will make up a slightly higher portion, about 2%. That will mark a peak, the bank predicted, noting that there are “early signs of stability shrink levels already in 2023.”

More broadly, in the post-pandemic economy, retailers are facing price pressures from all sides: Inflation-squeezed consumers are being pickier, while foot traffic in many downtowns is well below its pre-pandemic levels, making retail in these formerly busy areas unsustainable.

Target is one such example, William Blair wrote. The Minneapolis-based chain has been vocal in its complaints about theft, most recently with plans to close nine stores in New York, Portland, Seattle, and the San Francisco Bay area.

“[W]e cannot continue operating these stores because theft and organized retail crime are threatening the safety of our team and guests, and contributing to unsustainable business performance,” Target announced in September. Despite investing in more surveillance and store guards, “we continue to face fundamental challenges to operating these stores safely and successfully,” the company said.

Actual crime statistics point to another culprit, however. Progressive newsletter Popular Information crunched the numbers last month and found that reported crime rates in the stores that closed were actually lower than at other nearby Targets which remain open.

William Blair suggested another possibility: Target could simply be closing unprofitable locations and conveniently blaming crime rather than bad business decisions. About five years ago, the chain, previously known for its sprawling complexes in suburban shopping centers, made a concerted push to have smaller-format stores in city downtowns, but it hasn’t publicly?? mentioned this as a strategy since 2020. There’s also the ever-growing popularity of online shopping, which, while boosting retailers’ bottom line, can take sales from their physical locations, making them less profitable. In fact, investment bank UBS expects online shopping to be a major factor in the closure of 50,000 retail locations over the next five years.

“Target could be using shrink to mask other issues, including poor inventory management, which came to a head in 2022 following supply chain disruption, and is now exiting underperforming stores to boost overall margins,” William Blair wrote.

“We believe companies like Target could indeed be using the current narrative around shrink to take broader action in lagging parts of their business,” the bank noted. (Target did not reply to a Fortune request for comment on the bank’s assessment.)

Since the pandemic emptied out downtowns three years ago, plenty of stores have closed from a combination of fewer customers and higher rent. Remote-work guru Nicholas Bloom estimated that the typical office worker’s spending in downtowns has fallen as much as $4,600 today from pre-pandemic levels. Walmart earlier this year closed four Chicago city stores with no mention of crime but saying it was losing “tens of millions of dollars a year” on the locations, according to William Blair.

‘Maybe we cried too much’

It’s not just Target: As far back as 2021, the Los Angeles Times noted that retail industry figures had a habit of exaggerating the impact of organized crime on retail. “Although some retail and law enforcement lobbyists cite eye-popping figures, there is reason to doubt the problem is anywhere near as large or widespread as they say,” the Times found.

Walgreens is one retailer that has admitted its fears may have been overblown. In 2021, the chain blamed multiple San Francisco store closures on rising crime, setting off a major discussion about crime in the city, but it has since reversed itself.

“Maybe we cried too much last year” about theft, chief financial officer James Kehoe admitted on an investor call in January.

To be sure, William Blair doesn’t completely discount the effect of shoplifting. Crime will continue to be one of several factors dragging down retail margins, the bank predicts, saying, “We see limited, if any, near-term fixes to the larger problem of organized retail theft,” given that shoplifting was and remains relatively low-risk and the popularity of online resale platforms like Amazon, eBay and Facebook Marketplace make it easy and profitable to offload stolen goods.

In fact, the bank suggests, it’s possible that retailers are making a lot of noise about theft to spur a government crackdown, since there’s not much they can do on their own, and the measures they have taken so far—like locking up merchandise—are unpopular with customers and can depress sales further.

“It seems really the only thing the government could do would be to go after [organized retail crime] at higher levels,” the bank wrote, adding, “this will likely be a slow journey.”

財富中文網(wǎng)所刊載內(nèi)容之知識產(chǎn)權(quán)為財富媒體知識產(chǎn)權(quán)有限公司及/或相關(guān)權(quán)利人專屬所有或持有,。未經(jīng)許可,,禁止進(jìn)行轉(zhuǎn)載、摘編,、復(fù)制及建立鏡像等任何使用,。
0條Plus
精彩評論
評論

撰寫或查看更多評論

請打開財富Plus APP

前往打開
熱讀文章