我想看一级黄色片_欧美性爱无遮挡电影_色丁香视频网站中文字幕_视频一区 视频二区 国产,日本三级理论日本电影,午夜不卡免费大片,国产午夜视频在线观看,18禁无遮拦无码国产在线播放,在线视频不卡国产在线视频不卡 ,,欧美一及黄片,日韩国产另类

首頁(yè) 500強(qiáng) 活動(dòng) 榜單 商業(yè) 科技 商潮 專(zhuān)題 品牌中心
雜志訂閱

新冠疫情何時(shí)才能真正結(jié)束,?

Erin Prater
2023-01-18

新冠疫情大流行何時(shí)結(jié)束,?或者說(shuō),什么才叫結(jié)束,?

文本設(shè)置
小號(hào)
默認(rèn)
大號(hào)
Plus(0條)

圖片來(lái)源:ANGUS MORDANT/BLOOMBERG VIA GETTY IMAGES

新冠病毒永遠(yuǎn)不會(huì)消失了,。但疫情終有一天會(huì)結(jié)束。對(duì)吧,?

對(duì)許多人來(lái)說(shuō),,戴口罩,、保持社交距離、頻繁洗手已經(jīng)成為他們不愿意重溫的充滿(mǎn)創(chuàng)傷的過(guò)去時(shí),。

上周,,拜登政府再次將美國(guó)公共衛(wèi)生緊急狀態(tài)延長(zhǎng)90天,不過(guò)美國(guó)衛(wèi)生與公眾服務(wù)部(U.S. Department of Health and Human Services)的官員最近提醒各州,,緊急狀態(tài)可能很快就會(huì)結(jié)束,。世界衛(wèi)生組織(World Health Organization)的官員表態(tài)同樣樂(lè)觀,預(yù)計(jì)全球衛(wèi)生緊急狀態(tài)可能會(huì)在今年結(jié)束,。相關(guān)委員會(huì)定于1月27日舉行會(huì)議,,討論這個(gè)議題。

三年過(guò)去了,,我們是否仍然處于大流行之中,?對(duì)于“大流行”和“地方性流行病”這兩個(gè)術(shù)語(yǔ),目前還沒(méi)有一致的定義,,它們的粗略區(qū)別在于,,前者指影響全球的疾病爆發(fā),后者指影響一國(guó)等某一特定地區(qū)的爆發(fā),。由于對(duì)定義缺乏共識(shí),,因此無(wú)法明確斷言大流行是否仍在繼續(xù)。人們的觀點(diǎn)各不相同,,眾說(shuō)紛紜,。

在什么情況下我們能夠達(dá)成一致?我們還可以達(dá)成一致嗎,?

“不幸的是,,‘大流行’實(shí)際上更多的是一個(gè)政治和社會(huì)學(xué)術(shù)語(yǔ),而不是一個(gè)科學(xué)術(shù)語(yǔ),?!蔽挥诩~約的智庫(kù)克羅爾研究所(Kroll Institute)的首席醫(yī)學(xué)顧問(wèn)杰伊·瓦爾馬博士在接受《財(cái)富》雜志采訪(fǎng)時(shí)說(shuō)道。瓦爾馬在美國(guó)疾病控制和預(yù)防中心(U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)工作了20年,,在今年3月加入該研究所之前,,是紐約市新冠疫情應(yīng)對(duì)工作的主要架構(gòu)師。

瓦爾馬表示,,“當(dāng)社會(huì)或政府來(lái)到一個(gè)愿意接受每天出現(xiàn)一定數(shù)量死亡的時(shí)間點(diǎn)時(shí)”,,大流行就會(huì)變成地方性流行病——至少在公眾輿論的法庭上是這樣。

“這當(dāng)然不是由科學(xué)家決定的,。公共衛(wèi)生領(lǐng)域的人會(huì)說(shuō),,這是不可接受的。”他說(shuō),。

紐約大學(xué)全球公共衛(wèi)生學(xué)院(New York University’s School of Global Public Health)的客座教授邁克爾·默森博士對(duì)瓦爾馬的評(píng)論表示贊同,,他告訴《財(cái)富》雜志,公眾已經(jīng)接受了大流行已經(jīng)結(jié)束的觀點(diǎn),,但代價(jià)是大批人員傷亡,。

默森承認(rèn),現(xiàn)在的情況比2020年年初要好,。然而,,他說(shuō),新冠病毒“造成的死亡數(shù)字對(duì)我來(lái)說(shuō)仍然不可接受”,。默森補(bǔ)充道,,現(xiàn)今社會(huì)對(duì)死亡人數(shù)的接受程度——僅在美國(guó),每年就有數(shù)十萬(wàn)人死亡——“令人不安”,。

現(xiàn)在尤其不是時(shí)候

許多公共衛(wèi)生專(zhuān)家認(rèn)為,,現(xiàn)在還不是宣布大流行結(jié)束的時(shí)候。原因是中國(guó)在最近解除了“清零”政策,。除了中國(guó)之外,,被稱(chēng)為“克拉肯”的令人生畏的新冠病毒變種XBB.1.5在美國(guó)的傳播正在飆升。最近美國(guó)東北部住院人數(shù)上漲,,XBB.1.5是其中重要原因,。隨著該毒株西擴(kuò),同樣的勢(shì)頭也可能出現(xiàn)在美國(guó)的其他地區(qū),。世界上的其他國(guó)家最終也可能會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn)自己將經(jīng)歷類(lèi)似的遭遇,。

瓦爾馬說(shuō),XBB.1.5的攀升“只是在提醒人們,,盡管人們很希望這場(chǎng)大流行結(jié)束,但它并沒(méi)有結(jié)束,?!彼€補(bǔ)充道:“病毒的表現(xiàn)似乎并不希望這場(chǎng)大流行結(jié)束?!?/p>

然而,,美國(guó)公共衛(wèi)生協(xié)會(huì)(American Public Health Association)的主席喬治·本杰明博士在接受《財(cái)富》雜志采訪(fǎng)時(shí)表示,現(xiàn)在可能是時(shí)候結(jié)束緊急狀態(tài)了,。美國(guó)公共衛(wèi)生協(xié)會(huì)是一個(gè)有150年歷史,、由公衛(wèi)專(zhuān)業(yè)人士組成的組織,旨在促進(jìn)美國(guó)的健康和衛(wèi)生公平,。

“它一定會(huì)在某個(gè)時(shí)間點(diǎn)結(jié)束,。”他在1月10日談到美國(guó)聯(lián)邦公衛(wèi)緊急狀態(tài)時(shí)說(shuō),“我認(rèn)為我們正在快速接近這一時(shí)刻,?!?/p>

“政策制定者不想再為此出錢(qián)了;人們不想再關(guān)注它了,?!北窘苊髡f(shuō),“這與人類(lèi)行為有關(guān),。如果什么事情都是緊急情況,,那就沒(méi)有什么是緊急情況了?!?/p>

但他警告說(shuō),,宣布緊急情況結(jié)束并不意味著大流行已經(jīng)結(jié)束。

“這不能說(shuō)明任何事情,?!北窘苊髡f(shuō)?!氨M管我們沒(méi)有宣布處于公共衛(wèi)生緊急狀態(tài),,我們卻仍然在經(jīng)歷艾滋病毒大流行?!?/p>

如何走出大流行

紐約市立大學(xué)公共衛(wèi)生學(xué)院(City University of New York School of Public Health)的衛(wèi)生政策與管理教授布魯斯·李博士告訴《財(cái)富》雜志,,有幾種走出大流行的方法是被人們普遍接受的。

其中之一是等全球新冠病毒感染水平充分下降,。這時(shí),,病毒可能會(huì)形成一種真正的季節(jié)性模式,類(lèi)似于呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)和流感,,在夏季幾乎不存在病例,,而在冬季激增?;蛘?,新冠病毒水平可能會(huì)在某種程度上下降至長(zhǎng)期的“高位平臺(tái)期”,全年病例都處于相對(duì)較高的水平,。

布魯斯·李認(rèn)為,,向后一種情況的過(guò)渡可能正在進(jìn)行中。病例峰值已經(jīng)沒(méi)有大流行早期那么高,。峰值之間的低谷也不像以前那樣低,,新冠疫情未來(lái)可能以這種地方性流行病的模式存在——病毒傳播水平一直維持在較高水平。

布魯斯·李說(shuō),,季節(jié)性模式更加有利,。

“我們不希望全年都維持在過(guò)高的穩(wěn)定水平。”他說(shuō),,“這種情況比季節(jié)性傳播要難管理,。”

大號(hào)感冒/流感,?

由于美國(guó)仍然處于新冠,、RSV和流感的“三聯(lián)大流行”之中,公共衛(wèi)生官員警告那些有發(fā)燒和不適癥狀的人不要想當(dāng)然地認(rèn)為自己得了流感,,而是要進(jìn)行新冠檢測(cè),。專(zhuān)家說(shuō),目前根據(jù)癥狀幾乎不可能將兩者區(qū)分開(kāi)來(lái),。

上述現(xiàn)實(shí)也加劇了人們對(duì)大流行合法性的爭(zhēng)論,。如果對(duì)某些人來(lái)說(shuō),新冠和流感甚至是感冒沒(méi)有區(qū)別,,怎么還能稱(chēng)新冠為大流行呢,?

問(wèn)出這個(gè)問(wèn)題很合理,但答案很簡(jiǎn)單:感冒病毒很少會(huì)導(dǎo)致死亡,,甚至流感的死亡率也不像新冠那么高,。

紐約大學(xué)的默森表示:“從心理上講,我擔(dān)心公眾正在逐步接受當(dāng)前的情況,,認(rèn)為大流行已經(jīng)結(jié)束,,盡管事實(shí)上我們每年有25萬(wàn)到30萬(wàn)人死亡,遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)超過(guò)流感死亡人數(shù),?!?/p>

根據(jù)美國(guó)疾病控制和預(yù)防中心的數(shù)據(jù),上一季流感導(dǎo)致大約5,000名美國(guó)人死亡,。當(dāng)然,,由于人們對(duì)新冠疫情采取的預(yù)防措施,今年的流感相對(duì)溫和,。但每年流感死亡人數(shù)通常為數(shù)萬(wàn)人,,而新冠是數(shù)十萬(wàn)人。自大流行開(kāi)始以來(lái),,新冠病毒已經(jīng)導(dǎo)致近110萬(wàn)美國(guó)人死亡。流感造成的死亡人數(shù)不到5萬(wàn),。

雖然公眾和許多公共衛(wèi)生專(zhuān)家對(duì)大流行的看法仍然存在分歧,,但布魯斯·李認(rèn)為,目前情況正在好轉(zhuǎn),。

他說(shuō),,在2020年,許多公共衛(wèi)生專(zhuān)家預(yù)測(cè),這場(chǎng)大流行將持續(xù)大約兩年半到三年,,與1918年大流感和其他疫情爆發(fā)的時(shí)間相當(dāng),,比如735-737年的日本天花疫情、黑死病和1629-1631年的意大利鼠疫,。

“與我們最初的預(yù)期相比,,實(shí)際情況或多或少和當(dāng)時(shí)的預(yù)測(cè)一致,當(dāng)然‘多’的部分要多一點(diǎn),?!辈剪斔埂だ钫f(shuō),“這表明2023年可能是一個(gè)重大的轉(zhuǎn)折年,。我們看到了正確的趨勢(shì),。”(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))

譯者:Agatha

新冠病毒永遠(yuǎn)不會(huì)消失了,。但疫情終有一天會(huì)結(jié)束,。對(duì)吧?

對(duì)許多人來(lái)說(shuō),,戴口罩,、保持社交距離、頻繁洗手已經(jīng)成為他們不愿意重溫的充滿(mǎn)創(chuàng)傷的過(guò)去時(shí),。

上周,,拜登政府再次將美國(guó)公共衛(wèi)生緊急狀態(tài)延長(zhǎng)90天,不過(guò)美國(guó)衛(wèi)生與公眾服務(wù)部(U.S. Department of Health and Human Services)的官員最近提醒各州,,緊急狀態(tài)可能很快就會(huì)結(jié)束,。世界衛(wèi)生組織(World Health Organization)的官員表態(tài)同樣樂(lè)觀,預(yù)計(jì)全球衛(wèi)生緊急狀態(tài)可能會(huì)在今年結(jié)束,。相關(guān)委員會(huì)定于1月27日舉行會(huì)議,,討論這個(gè)議題。

三年過(guò)去了,,我們是否仍然處于大流行之中,?對(duì)于“大流行”和“地方性流行病”這兩個(gè)術(shù)語(yǔ),目前還沒(méi)有一致的定義,,它們的粗略區(qū)別在于,,前者指影響全球的疾病爆發(fā),后者指影響一國(guó)等某一特定地區(qū)的爆發(fā),。由于對(duì)定義缺乏共識(shí),,因此無(wú)法明確斷言大流行是否仍在繼續(xù)。人們的觀點(diǎn)各不相同,,眾說(shuō)紛紜,。

在什么情況下我們能夠達(dá)成一致,?我們還可以達(dá)成一致嗎?

“不幸的是,,‘大流行’實(shí)際上更多的是一個(gè)政治和社會(huì)學(xué)術(shù)語(yǔ),,而不是一個(gè)科學(xué)術(shù)語(yǔ)?!蔽挥诩~約的智庫(kù)克羅爾研究所(Kroll Institute)的首席醫(yī)學(xué)顧問(wèn)杰伊·瓦爾馬博士在接受《財(cái)富》雜志采訪(fǎng)時(shí)說(shuō)道,。瓦爾馬在美國(guó)疾病控制和預(yù)防中心(U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)工作了20年,在今年3月加入該研究所之前,,是紐約市新冠疫情應(yīng)對(duì)工作的主要架構(gòu)師,。

瓦爾馬表示,“當(dāng)社會(huì)或政府來(lái)到一個(gè)愿意接受每天出現(xiàn)一定數(shù)量死亡的時(shí)間點(diǎn)時(shí)”,,大流行就會(huì)變成地方性流行病——至少在公眾輿論的法庭上是這樣,。

“這當(dāng)然不是由科學(xué)家決定的。公共衛(wèi)生領(lǐng)域的人會(huì)說(shuō),,這是不可接受的,。”他說(shuō),。

紐約大學(xué)全球公共衛(wèi)生學(xué)院(New York University’s School of Global Public Health)的客座教授邁克爾·默森博士對(duì)瓦爾馬的評(píng)論表示贊同,,他告訴《財(cái)富》雜志,公眾已經(jīng)接受了大流行已經(jīng)結(jié)束的觀點(diǎn),,但代價(jià)是大批人員傷亡,。

默森承認(rèn),現(xiàn)在的情況比2020年年初要好,。然而,,他說(shuō),新冠病毒“造成的死亡數(shù)字對(duì)我來(lái)說(shuō)仍然不可接受”,。默森補(bǔ)充道,,現(xiàn)今社會(huì)對(duì)死亡人數(shù)的接受程度——僅在美國(guó),每年就有數(shù)十萬(wàn)人死亡——“令人不安”,。

現(xiàn)在尤其不是時(shí)候

許多公共衛(wèi)生專(zhuān)家認(rèn)為,,現(xiàn)在還不是宣布大流行結(jié)束的時(shí)候。原因是中國(guó)在最近解除了“清零”政策,。除了中國(guó)之外,,被稱(chēng)為“克拉肯”的令人生畏的新冠病毒變種XBB.1.5在美國(guó)的傳播正在飆升。最近美國(guó)東北部住院人數(shù)上漲,,XBB.1.5是其中重要原因,。隨著該毒株西擴(kuò),同樣的勢(shì)頭也可能出現(xiàn)在美國(guó)的其他地區(qū),。世界上的其他國(guó)家最終也可能會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn)自己將經(jīng)歷類(lèi)似的遭遇,。

瓦爾馬說(shuō),XBB.1.5的攀升“只是在提醒人們,,盡管人們很希望這場(chǎng)大流行結(jié)束,,但它并沒(méi)有結(jié)束?!彼€補(bǔ)充道:“病毒的表現(xiàn)似乎并不希望這場(chǎng)大流行結(jié)束,。”

然而,,美國(guó)公共衛(wèi)生協(xié)會(huì)(American Public Health Association)的主席喬治·本杰明博士在接受《財(cái)富》雜志采訪(fǎng)時(shí)表示,,現(xiàn)在可能是時(shí)候結(jié)束緊急狀態(tài)了。美國(guó)公共衛(wèi)生協(xié)會(huì)是一個(gè)有150年歷史,、由公衛(wèi)專(zhuān)業(yè)人士組成的組織,,旨在促進(jìn)美國(guó)的健康和衛(wèi)生公平。

“它一定會(huì)在某個(gè)時(shí)間點(diǎn)結(jié)束,?!彼?月10日談到美國(guó)聯(lián)邦公衛(wèi)緊急狀態(tài)時(shí)說(shuō),“我認(rèn)為我們正在快速接近這一時(shí)刻,?!?/p>

“政策制定者不想再為此出錢(qián)了;人們不想再關(guān)注它了,?!北窘苊髡f(shuō),“這與人類(lèi)行為有關(guān),。如果什么事情都是緊急情況,,那就沒(méi)有什么是緊急情況了?!?/p>

但他警告說(shuō),,宣布緊急情況結(jié)束并不意味著大流行已經(jīng)結(jié)束。

“這不能說(shuō)明任何事情,?!北窘苊髡f(shuō)?!氨M管我們沒(méi)有宣布處于公共衛(wèi)生緊急狀態(tài),,我們卻仍然在經(jīng)歷艾滋病毒大流行?!?/p>

如何走出大流行

紐約市立大學(xué)公共衛(wèi)生學(xué)院(City University of New York School of Public Health)的衛(wèi)生政策與管理教授布魯斯·李博士告訴《財(cái)富》雜志,,有幾種走出大流行的方法是被人們普遍接受的。

其中之一是等全球新冠病毒感染水平充分下降,。這時(shí),,病毒可能會(huì)形成一種真正的季節(jié)性模式,,類(lèi)似于呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)和流感,在夏季幾乎不存在病例,,而在冬季激增,。或者,,新冠病毒水平可能會(huì)在某種程度上下降至長(zhǎng)期的“高位平臺(tái)期”,,全年病例都處于相對(duì)較高的水平。

布魯斯·李認(rèn)為,,向后一種情況的過(guò)渡可能正在進(jìn)行中,。病例峰值已經(jīng)沒(méi)有大流行早期那么高。峰值之間的低谷也不像以前那樣低,,新冠疫情未來(lái)可能以這種地方性流行病的模式存在——病毒傳播水平一直維持在較高水平,。

布魯斯·李說(shuō),季節(jié)性模式更加有利,。

“我們不希望全年都維持在過(guò)高的穩(wěn)定水平,。”他說(shuō),,“這種情況比季節(jié)性傳播要難管理,。”

大號(hào)感冒/流感,?

由于美國(guó)仍然處于新冠,、RSV和流感的“三聯(lián)大流行”之中,公共衛(wèi)生官員警告那些有發(fā)燒和不適癥狀的人不要想當(dāng)然地認(rèn)為自己得了流感,,而是要進(jìn)行新冠檢測(cè),。專(zhuān)家說(shuō),目前根據(jù)癥狀幾乎不可能將兩者區(qū)分開(kāi)來(lái),。

上述現(xiàn)實(shí)也加劇了人們對(duì)大流行合法性的爭(zhēng)論,。如果對(duì)某些人來(lái)說(shuō),新冠和流感甚至是感冒沒(méi)有區(qū)別,,怎么還能稱(chēng)新冠為大流行呢,?

問(wèn)出這個(gè)問(wèn)題很合理,但答案很簡(jiǎn)單:感冒病毒很少會(huì)導(dǎo)致死亡,,甚至流感的死亡率也不像新冠那么高,。

紐約大學(xué)的默森表示:“從心理上講,我擔(dān)心公眾正在逐步接受當(dāng)前的情況,,認(rèn)為大流行已經(jīng)結(jié)束,,盡管事實(shí)上我們每年有25萬(wàn)到30萬(wàn)人死亡,遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)超過(guò)流感死亡人數(shù),?!?/p>

根據(jù)美國(guó)疾病控制和預(yù)防中心的數(shù)據(jù),,上一季流感導(dǎo)致大約5,000名美國(guó)人死亡。當(dāng)然,,由于人們對(duì)新冠疫情采取的預(yù)防措施,,今年的流感相對(duì)溫和。但每年流感死亡人數(shù)通常為數(shù)萬(wàn)人,,而新冠是數(shù)十萬(wàn)人。自大流行開(kāi)始以來(lái),,新冠病毒已經(jīng)導(dǎo)致近110萬(wàn)美國(guó)人死亡,。流感造成的死亡人數(shù)不到5萬(wàn)。

雖然公眾和許多公共衛(wèi)生專(zhuān)家對(duì)大流行的看法仍然存在分歧,,但布魯斯·李認(rèn)為,,目前情況正在好轉(zhuǎn)。

他說(shuō),,在2020年,,許多公共衛(wèi)生專(zhuān)家預(yù)測(cè),這場(chǎng)大流行將持續(xù)大約兩年半到三年,,與1918年大流感和其他疫情爆發(fā)的時(shí)間相當(dāng),,比如735-737年的日本天花疫情、黑死病和1629-1631年的意大利鼠疫,。

“與我們最初的預(yù)期相比,,實(shí)際情況或多或少和當(dāng)時(shí)的預(yù)測(cè)一致,當(dāng)然‘多’的部分要多一點(diǎn),?!辈剪斔埂だ钫f(shuō),“這表明2023年可能是一個(gè)重大的轉(zhuǎn)折年,。我們看到了正確的趨勢(shì),。”(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))

譯者:Agatha

COVID is never going away. But the pandemic will inevitably end at some point. Right?

For many, it already has, with masks, social distancing, and frequent handwashing relegated to a traumatic past they’re unwilling to revisit.

Last week the Biden administration extended the U.S. public health emergency for another 90 days, though U.S. Department of Health and Human Services officials recently warned states that the emergency status may soon come to an end. World Health Organization officials, too, continue to express optimism that the global health emergency may draw to a close this year. A committee meeting on the matter is set for Jan. 27.

Are we—or are we not—still in a pandemic, three years in? There aren’t consensus definitions for the terms “pandemic” and “endemic,” which loosely refer to a disease outbreak affecting the world, and a particular area like a country, respectively. Given the lack of agreement, it’s impossible to definitively say if the pandemic is ongoing. Personal opinions vary, and shades of gray abound.

At what point will we all agree? Will we ever?

“Unfortunately, ‘pandemic’ is really more of a political and sociological term than a scientific one,” Dr. Jay Varma, chief medical adviser at the New York-based think tank Kroll Institute, told Fortune. A 20-year veteran of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Varma was the principal architect for New York City’s COVID-19 pandemic response before joining the institute in March.

A pandemic tends to transform into an epidemic—at least in the court of public opinion—“when society or government reaches a point where it’s willing to accept a certain number of deaths each day,” Varma said.

“It’s certainly not scientists who decide that. Those in public health would say that’s not acceptable.”

Dr. Michael Merson, visiting professor at New York University’s School of Global Public Health, echoed Varma’s comments, telling Fortune that the general public has accepted that the pandemic is over—at the expense of mass casualties.

Conditions are better than they were in the early days of 2020, he concedes. COVID, however, “is still causing—to me—an unacceptable amount of deaths,” he said, adding that society’s acceptance of the body count—hundreds of thousands annually in the U.S. alone—is “disturbing.”

Not now, of all times

Of all times to declare the pandemic over, now is not it, many public health experts contend. The reason: the recent unshackling of China from years of “zero COVID” restrictions. China aside, levels of potentially daunting COVID variant XBB.1.5, dubbed “Kraken,” are surging in the U.S. They played a role in a recent rise in hospitalizations in the Northeast—a trend that could play out in the rest of the country, as the virus expands westward. Other countries could eventually find themselves in a similar situation.

XBB.1.5’s rise “is just a reminder that as much as he would like this pandemic to be over, it’s not,” Varma said. “The virus isn’t behaving as if it wants this pandemic to be over.”

Still, it may be time to end emergency declarations, Dr. Georges Benjamin, head of the American Public Health Association, a 150-year-old organization of public health professionals that seeks to promote health and health equity in the U.S., told Fortune.

“It’s got to go away at some point,” he said on January 10 about the U.S. federal health emergency. “And I think we’re quickly approaching that point.”

“The policymakers don’t want to fund it anymore; people don’t want to pay attention to it anymore,” he said. “It’s a human behavior thing. If everything is an emergency, nothing is.”

But declaring an end to the emergency doesn’t mean the pandemic’s over, Benjamin cautioned.

“It doesn’t mean anything,” he said. “We’re not in a public health emergency and we still have an HIV/AIDS pandemic.”

How to exit the pandemic

There are a few generally accepted paths out of pandemic status, Dr. Bruce Y. Lee, professor of health policy and management at the City University of New York School of Public Health, told?Fortune.

One of them: when the level of COVID infections drops sufficiently worldwide. The virus could settle into a pattern of true seasonality, similar to what is seen with RSV and the flu, in which cases are virtually nonexistent in the summer and spike in the winter. Or COVID levels could decline—somewhat—to a prolonged “high plateau,” with a relatively elevated level of cases occurring throughout the year.

A transition to the later scenario could be underway now, Lee contends. Peaks in cases aren’t as high as they were in early pandemic days. Nor are valleys between spikes as low as they were—painting a potential picture of an endemic COVID future with consistently elevated levels of viral transmission.

A seasonal pattern would be preferable, Lee says.

“We don’t want to have higher-than-high plateaus or constant levels throughout the year,” he said. “That’s a lot more difficult to manage than something seasonal.”

A glorified cold or flu?

With the U.S. still in the grips of a “tripledemic” of COVID, RSV and the flu, public health officials are warning those with symptoms like fever and malaise to not assume they have the flu, and to test for COVID. It’s virtually impossible to distinguish the two based on symptoms right now, experts say.

It’s a reality fueling office water-cooler debates about the continued legitimacy of the pandemic. How can COVID still be of pandemic status if it’s indistinguishable from the flu or, for some, a cold?

It’s a fair question, but one with a simple answer: Cold viruses rarely kill—and the flu doesn’t kill nearly as often as COVID.

“Psychologically, I’m afraid the public is accepting our current situation as the pandemic being over, despite the fact that we have 250,000, 300,000 deaths a year—far more than we have with the flu,” said Merson, from New York University.

Last season, the flu killed an estimated 5,000 Americans, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. It was a mild flu year, to be sure, thanks to pandemic precautions. But annual flu death tolls routinely number in the tens of thousands—not hundreds of thousands, like COVID deaths. Since the pandemic began, COVID has killed nearly 1.1 million Americans. The flu has killed less than 50,000.

While the public and many public health experts continue to be at odds on the pandemic’s status, Lee says things are looking up—at the moment.

In 2020, many public health experts predicted that the pandemic would last around 2.5-3 years, he says—about the length of the 1918 flu pandemic and other outbreaks, like the Japanese smallpox epidemic of 735-737, the Black Death, and the Italian plague of 1629-1631.

“We’re roughly on schedule, plus or minus—more plus—compared to what we originally anticipated,” Lee said. “This suggests that 2023 may be the big transition year. We’re seeing the right trends.”

財(cái)富中文網(wǎng)所刊載內(nèi)容之知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)為財(cái)富媒體知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)有限公司及/或相關(guān)權(quán)利人專(zhuān)屬所有或持有,。未經(jīng)許可,,禁止進(jìn)行轉(zhuǎn)載、摘編,、復(fù)制及建立鏡像等任何使用,。
0條Plus
精彩評(píng)論
評(píng)論

撰寫(xiě)或查看更多評(píng)論

請(qǐng)打開(kāi)財(cái)富Plus APP

前往打開(kāi)
熱讀文章