我想看一级黄色片_欧美性爱无遮挡电影_色丁香视频网站中文字幕_视频一区 视频二区 国产,日本三级理论日本电影,午夜不卡免费大片,国产午夜视频在线观看,18禁无遮拦无码国产在线播放,在线视频不卡国产在线视频不卡 ,,欧美一及黄片,日韩国产另类

首頁(yè) 500強(qiáng) 活動(dòng) 榜單 商業(yè) 科技 領(lǐng)導(dǎo)力 專題 品牌中心
雜志訂閱

航空業(yè)初現(xiàn)復(fù)蘇,,會(huì)被奧密克戎打破嗎,?

Kat Eschner
2021-12-24

各大機(jī)場(chǎng)采取的防疫措施在一定程度上提振了消費(fèi)者的信心,但效果能夠維持多久,,還要打一個(gè)大大的問號(hào),。

文本設(shè)置
小號(hào)
默認(rèn)
大號(hào)
Plus(0條)

隨著新冠疫情進(jìn)入第三個(gè)年頭,,航空業(yè)也終于等來了復(fù)蘇的跡象,。在2020年4月,全球航空業(yè)的客運(yùn)需求曾經(jīng)一度爆跌近95%,。不過到了2021年,,客運(yùn)航空大概已經(jīng)恢復(fù)到了新冠疫情前40%的水平。

國(guó)際機(jī)場(chǎng)協(xié)會(huì)北美分會(huì)(Airports Council International—North America)的安全事務(wù)高級(jí)副總裁克里斯托弗·比德韋爾說:“各大機(jī)場(chǎng)都做了很多工作,,并且在防疫上做出大量投資,,以確保旅客和工作人員的健康與安全?!?/p>

各大機(jī)場(chǎng)采取的防疫措施在一定程度上提振了消費(fèi)者的信心,,也提高了人們坐飛機(jī)的意愿,但它的效果能夠維持多久,,還要打一個(gè)大大的問號(hào),。新一波奧密克戎毒株的流行再次表明,新冠病毒仍然在持續(xù)進(jìn)化,。另外,,很多專家擔(dān)心它很有可能會(huì)突破新冠疫苗構(gòu)建的免疫屏障。在中短期看來,,奧密克戎毒株是航空業(yè)面臨的最大威脅,。但從長(zhǎng)期來看,下一波疫情大流行的可能仍然不能排除,。

全球機(jī)場(chǎng)行業(yè)是一個(gè)市值高達(dá)1300億美元的龐大市場(chǎng),光是美國(guó)機(jī)場(chǎng)行業(yè)的市值就達(dá)到了66億美元,。而自從新冠疫情爆發(fā)以來,,飛機(jī)和機(jī)場(chǎng)就一直是防疫工作的重點(diǎn)之一,。早在2018年,就有一位新加坡學(xué)者指出,,如果某地爆發(fā)了一場(chǎng)疫情,至于它能否被控制在本地,,還是會(huì)蔓延成一場(chǎng)災(zāi)難性的全球性疫情,,“機(jī)場(chǎng)管理部門就是最后一道防線”。雖然自新冠疫情爆發(fā)以來,,各大機(jī)場(chǎng)都做出了一些變化以重振公眾的信心,,但有專家在研究了機(jī)場(chǎng)在疫情傳播中扮演的角色后表示,這些措施仍然遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)不夠,。

現(xiàn)在的機(jī)場(chǎng),既不像新冠疫情剛爆發(fā)時(shí)那樣宛如“鬼城”般的空無一人,,也不像新冠疫情爆發(fā)前那樣喧囂,。蘇黎世大學(xué)旅行醫(yī)學(xué)中心(University of Zurich’s Centre for Travel Medicine)的教授、世界衛(wèi)生組織旅行者健康合作中心(WHO Collaborating Centre for Travellers’ Health)的主任帕特麗夏·施拉根霍夫指出,,機(jī)場(chǎng)已經(jīng)很好地適應(yīng)了“新常態(tài)”下的一些基本的公共衛(wèi)生限制,。在很多地方的機(jī)場(chǎng),,像戴口罩、保持社交距離,、用有機(jī)玻璃“硬隔離”和放置洗手液等做法都已經(jīng)成了“新常態(tài)”,,跟在超市等場(chǎng)所并沒有什么區(qū)別。

比德韋爾表示,,在新冠疫情爆發(fā)后,,他的公司立即成立了一個(gè)抗疫工作小組,負(fù)責(zé)指導(dǎo)北美地區(qū)機(jī)場(chǎng)的防疫工作,。這個(gè)小組的成員由美國(guó)和加拿大的業(yè)內(nèi)人士組成,,小組里既沒有科學(xué)家,也沒有緊密追蹤新冠疫情發(fā)展的專業(yè)人員,,但是小組成員仍然帶來了一些他們?cè)诠ぷ髦杏龅降膯栴},,同時(shí)該小組也在密切關(guān)注美國(guó)疾病預(yù)防與控制中心(CDC)等公共衛(wèi)生機(jī)構(gòu)的最新指南。

他的公司還向《財(cái)富》雜志推薦了一份該公司在2020年6月發(fā)布的報(bào)告,,這份報(bào)告距今已經(jīng)一年多了,。該報(bào)告是在美國(guó)的新冠疫情蔓延的第一階段撰寫的,它就美國(guó)如何從新冠疫情中復(fù)蘇也提出了42條高級(jí)別的建議,。該報(bào)告提出的一些公共衛(wèi)生領(lǐng)域的干預(yù)政策已經(jīng)得到了落實(shí)——比如用有機(jī)玻璃“硬隔離”,、為經(jīng)濟(jì)復(fù)蘇做好準(zhǔn)備、保持社交距離,、加強(qiáng)消毒等等,。

例如,現(xiàn)在北美機(jī)場(chǎng)的地面上到處都貼著貼紙,,提示人們?cè)谂抨?duì)時(shí)保持距離,,這就是該公司的報(bào)告給出的建議之一。另外,,各大機(jī)場(chǎng)還設(shè)計(jì)了專門的標(biāo)語(yǔ)牌,,提醒乘客戴口罩的重要性。

不過,,不論是在機(jī)場(chǎng)還是在其他場(chǎng)所,,消費(fèi)者是否守規(guī)矩都是一個(gè)大問題。今年早些時(shí)候,,美國(guó)聯(lián)邦航空管理局(Federal Aviation Authority)就指出,,2021年上半年,該局接到了成千上萬的乘客違規(guī)行為的投訴,,其中有四分之三是關(guān)于乘客不愿意佩戴口罩的,。而自2020年年初以來,美國(guó)就已經(jīng)要求所有人在公共交通場(chǎng)所必須佩戴口罩。

據(jù)《福布斯》(Forbes)在今年10月的報(bào)道,,美國(guó)聯(lián)邦航空管理局已經(jīng)加大了對(duì)這些不守規(guī)矩的乘客的處罰力度,。迄今為止,光是開出的罰單就超過了100萬美元,。但與此同時(shí),,負(fù)責(zé)機(jī)場(chǎng)安全的美國(guó)交通安全管理局(Transportation Security Administration)則只開出了2350美元的罰單。無獨(dú)有偶,,《財(cái)富》雜志的員工在撰寫此文過程中也發(fā)現(xiàn),,美國(guó)和其他一些國(guó)家的多個(gè)機(jī)場(chǎng)并未強(qiáng)制顧客戴口罩。

比德韋爾表示:“考慮到機(jī)場(chǎng)的占地面積很大,,他們也沒有足夠的資源將人手安排在各個(gè)地點(diǎn),。”

施拉根霍夫建議道,,機(jī)場(chǎng)可以應(yīng)用“影像流行病學(xué)”來提高防疫水平。顧名思義,,就是使用人工智能技術(shù)對(duì)機(jī)場(chǎng)進(jìn)行篩查,,看哪些人沒有正確佩戴口罩。一旦這些人被人工智能鎖定,,它就能夠向機(jī)場(chǎng)工作人員發(fā)送實(shí)時(shí)報(bào)告,,提醒哪些人沒有正確佩戴口罩。施拉根霍夫認(rèn)為,,哪怕人們只是知道有這樣一套系統(tǒng)存在,,他們配合防疫的意愿都會(huì)大大提高,。

像戴口罩,、保持社交距離、放置洗手液,、有機(jī)玻璃“硬隔離”這些招術(shù),,在超市這種地方或許夠用,因?yàn)檫@些地方暴露的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)較為有限,,但對(duì)于機(jī)場(chǎng)就不同了。

塞浦路斯大學(xué)(University of Cyprus)的教授克里斯托·尼克萊德斯專門研究傳染病的傳播方式,,他說:“機(jī)場(chǎng)是疫情大流行的一個(gè)重要組成部分,?!笔紫龋瑱C(jī)場(chǎng)是一個(gè)巨大的空間;其次,,來自全國(guó)各地的人都會(huì)聚集在這里,有的吃吃喝喝,,有的還要購(gòu)物,而這正是傳染病傳播的溫床,。

美國(guó)現(xiàn)在已經(jīng)有了奧密克戎毒株的確診病例,,它可以追溯到從南非入境的一名旅客身上,而這名旅客正是從舊金山國(guó)際機(jī)場(chǎng)(San Francisco International Airport)入境的,。雖然有關(guān)部門都認(rèn)為,,該乘客絕非美國(guó)境內(nèi)唯一的一例奧密克戎病例,但這個(gè)案例也說明了機(jī)場(chǎng)在疫情傳播過程中起了多么重要的作用,。

至于這名乘客(或者是將奧密克戎帶到美國(guó)的其他什么人)入境時(shí)在機(jī)場(chǎng)干了什么,,我們并不知道。他們有可能吃了一頓飯,,在機(jī)場(chǎng)的酒吧里喝了一瓶啤酒,也有可能買了點(diǎn)東西——這些活動(dòng)都是受到機(jī)場(chǎng)鼓勵(lì)的,。又或許他們只是取了行李,,之后就打車離開了。

現(xiàn)在我們也不知道奧密克戎毒株的傳播性到底有多強(qiáng),,不過可以肯定的是,,奧密克戎的傳播性已經(jīng)超過了迄今為止發(fā)現(xiàn)的所有毒株。世界各地的案例都表明,,它很有可能將成為美國(guó)甚至全世界占主導(dǎo)地位的毒株,。有的人可能只是摘下口罩吃了一個(gè)三明治,或者在排隊(duì)時(shí)沒有戴好口罩,,就很有可能感染其他乘客,,導(dǎo)致該毒株在全國(guó)范圍內(nèi)迅速傳播。

航空業(yè)的復(fù)蘇,,不止關(guān)系著行業(yè)的生死?,F(xiàn)在新冠疫情已經(jīng)進(jìn)入第三個(gè)年頭了,全世界的人都迫切期盼著與家人和朋友的團(tuán)聚,。

施拉根霍夫表示,,他在瑞士的診所里的很多人都是“探親訪友者”,也就是坐飛機(jī)去拜訪親戚和朋友的人,,不過比起新冠疫情以前還是少了很多,。

倫敦的上市數(shù)據(jù)分析咨詢公司GlobalData認(rèn)為,,這些“探親訪友”者對(duì)整個(gè)行業(yè)的復(fù)蘇至關(guān)重要。從歷史數(shù)據(jù)看,,探親訪友是人們乘飛機(jī)旅行的第二大原因,。該公司認(rèn)為,雖然2020年,,人們的探親訪友需求下降了超過三分之二,,乘坐國(guó)際航班探親訪友的人數(shù)也由大約2.3億人次下降至僅6920萬人次,但它的增長(zhǎng)幅度預(yù)計(jì)將很快超過休閑旅游,。

施拉根霍夫稱:“這方面的需求是十分強(qiáng)勁的,。另外我也認(rèn)為,‘旅行的自由’也是一項(xiàng)人權(quán),?!?/p>

據(jù)悉,舊金山國(guó)際機(jī)場(chǎng)和美國(guó)的其他三家大型國(guó)際機(jī)場(chǎng)近來已經(jīng)加強(qiáng)了對(duì)奧密克戎毒株的入境檢測(cè),,但這很可能并不足以阻止奧密克戎的傳播,,因?yàn)樵摱局旰苡锌赡芤呀?jīng)在美國(guó)隱匿傳播一段時(shí)間了。愛丁堡大學(xué)(University of Edinburgh)的基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施研究專家,、博士后研究員莫希特·阿羅拉表示,,從幾十年前開始,就有研究流行病學(xué)的專家不斷指出,,機(jī)場(chǎng)行業(yè)并未為流行病爆發(fā)做好準(zhǔn)備,。

阿羅拉稱,迄今為止,,機(jī)場(chǎng)做出的改變大多數(shù)都是很簡(jiǎn)單的——比如安裝洗手液盒等等,,這些措施主要還是著眼機(jī)場(chǎng)的經(jīng)濟(jì)利益。例如在自助身份認(rèn)證上,,只要將掃描攝像頭旋轉(zhuǎn)360度即可完成,。美國(guó)交通安全管理局已經(jīng)在一些地區(qū)試點(diǎn)了自助認(rèn)證等服務(wù),從而減少了旅客與機(jī)場(chǎng)方面的接觸,,而這也是航空業(yè)冀希望發(fā)展的一個(gè)方向,。

“在某此程度上,,這些措施是有幫助的,。”阿羅拉說,。同時(shí)他也表示,,目前要做的事情還有很多,而且我們面臨的也并非是一個(gè)新問題,。在2009年的H1N1流感大流行期間,,甚至在2002年至2003年的“非典”(SARS)期間,“人們就對(duì)防疫政策進(jìn)行過重大討論?!?/p>

直到新冠疫情期間,,這些政策討論仍然在繼續(xù),不過它著眼的并非只是當(dāng)前的疫情,。接受本刊采訪的專家們表示,,當(dāng)前政策討論的重點(diǎn)是要為未來做好準(zhǔn)備,特別是隨著時(shí)代的發(fā)展,,未來公眾對(duì)傳染病的暴露風(fēng)險(xiǎn)或許比以往還要高得多,。

有些專家提出的政策則更為激進(jìn),比新冠疫情以來機(jī)場(chǎng)采取的措施力度更大,,但或許的確能夠降低病毒的傳播速度,。比如塞浦路斯大學(xué)的教授尼克萊德斯就主張根據(jù)乘客的來源地和目的地進(jìn)行進(jìn)一步的隔離。

她說:“這樣你就可以了解發(fā)生了什么,?!碑?dāng)然,這種做法會(huì)顯著減少乘客的購(gòu)物行為,,而零售收入則占到了全球機(jī)場(chǎng)總收入的40%左右,。

另外,阿羅拉還指出了一個(gè)空間的問題,。很多時(shí)候,,乘客為了保持社交距離,會(huì)導(dǎo)致排隊(duì)排得特別的長(zhǎng),,從而升高了機(jī)場(chǎng)的暴露風(fēng)險(xiǎn),,抵消了保持社交距離所帶來的一些好處。針對(duì)這種情況,,機(jī)場(chǎng)不妨采取錯(cuò)峰登機(jī)或者分散排隊(duì)的方式,,來降低乘客的暴露風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。

施拉根霍夫表示,,目前,,機(jī)場(chǎng)需要做出的最大的改變就是標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化?!叭藗冃枰浅C鞔_的信息,。”她說,。

比德韋爾坦承,,到目前為止,包括標(biāo)志標(biāo)識(shí)在內(nèi)的很多機(jī)場(chǎng)防疫措施尚未達(dá)到標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化,?!安煌臋C(jī)場(chǎng)有不同的標(biāo)志,。”他說,。也就是說,,乘客到了一個(gè)陌生的環(huán)境,還會(huì)遇到一些陌生的規(guī)定,,甚至就連標(biāo)志都跟其他機(jī)場(chǎng)不一樣,,而這必然會(huì)降低防疫的效率和安全性。

施拉根霍夫指出,,標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化需要包括標(biāo)志標(biāo)識(shí),,但也遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)不止標(biāo)志標(biāo)識(shí)這么簡(jiǎn)單。消費(fèi)者從購(gòu)買機(jī)票的那一秒起,,他就必然會(huì)和整個(gè)全球航空網(wǎng)絡(luò)的方方面面發(fā)生接觸,,哪怕只是從紐約州的羅切斯特飛到紐約市。因此,,機(jī)場(chǎng)的防疫指南必須考慮到全球暴露的問題,。“風(fēng)險(xiǎn)不光是從機(jī)場(chǎng)開始,,而是在整個(gè)旅行當(dāng)中,。所以乘客都存在與旅行相關(guān)的暴露風(fēng)險(xiǎn)?!?/p>

這也意味著機(jī)場(chǎng)必須得在思想上做出重大轉(zhuǎn)變,。阿羅拉表示,現(xiàn)在的機(jī)場(chǎng)普遍沒有完成思想上的轉(zhuǎn)變,,現(xiàn)在大家基本上還是延襲新冠疫情前的那一套,,只是在防疫上出臺(tái)了一些新措施?!岸@并不是商業(yè)模式上的真正轉(zhuǎn)變,。”

今年早些時(shí)候,,美國(guó)各大機(jī)場(chǎng)通過拜登的《基建法案》成功拿到了200億美元的聯(lián)邦撥款,。比德韋爾指出,其中一些錢已經(jīng)被個(gè)別機(jī)場(chǎng)花在了防疫措施上,,不過他的公司并不知道相應(yīng)開銷的具體數(shù)額,。

公平地說,為了適應(yīng)疫情以來的“新常態(tài)”,,各大機(jī)場(chǎng)確實(shí)花了不少力氣,,也投入了不少真金白銀。在撰寫本文的過程中,,《財(cái)富》雜志先后采訪了美國(guó)的十個(gè)最大的機(jī)場(chǎng),,從它們向《財(cái)富》雜志提供的博文、媒體通稿和宣傳信息看,,它們?cè)谶^去兩年間確實(shí)做出了不小的改變,。

有些機(jī)場(chǎng)改進(jìn)了空調(diào)和通風(fēng)系統(tǒng),使其通風(fēng)效率提高了60%至100%——比如菲尼克斯天港國(guó)際機(jī)場(chǎng)(Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport),。該機(jī)場(chǎng)的發(fā)言人希瑟·謝爾布拉克在電子郵件中對(duì)《財(cái)富》雜志表示:“我們通過樓宇自動(dòng)化系統(tǒng),,加強(qiáng)了對(duì)400個(gè)空氣處理器中的34000多個(gè)濾芯的監(jiān)測(cè)和評(píng)估?!绷硗?,該機(jī)場(chǎng)獲得的聯(lián)邦撥款已經(jīng)被用于“償還債務(wù)、減免優(yōu)惠和運(yùn)營(yíng)支出”,。

邁阿密國(guó)際機(jī)場(chǎng)(Miami International Airport)指出,,2020年和2021年,它連續(xù)兩年獲得了國(guó)際機(jī)場(chǎng)協(xié)會(huì)頒發(fā)的“機(jī)場(chǎng)健康認(rèn)證”,。該機(jī)場(chǎng)的運(yùn)營(yíng)副總監(jiān)丹·阿戈斯蒂諾和特別項(xiàng)目運(yùn)營(yíng)主管杰西卡·馬林也在今年秋季的申請(qǐng)書中指出了機(jī)場(chǎng)面臨的一些困難,。

“……根據(jù)美國(guó)疾病預(yù)防與控制中心的建議,在可能的情況下,,機(jī)場(chǎng)要盡量鼓勵(lì)乘客保持距離,。但是由于客流量的增加,它只在有限的時(shí)間和地點(diǎn)可行,?!?/p>

機(jī)場(chǎng)的主觀能動(dòng)性畢竟是有限的。阿羅拉表示,,受市場(chǎng)力量影響,,他主張的很多防疫措施是不太可能被航空業(yè)主動(dòng)采用的?!爱?dāng)你走進(jìn)機(jī)場(chǎng)時(shí),,多數(shù)時(shí)候你就像一件傳送帶上的商品,只能任機(jī)場(chǎng)擺布,。然而事實(shí)證明,,在新冠疫情這樣的環(huán)境里,這種心態(tài)是十分危險(xiǎn)的,?!?/p>

施拉根霍夫認(rèn)為,要想讓機(jī)場(chǎng)行業(yè)加大防疫力度,,采取正確的防疫措施,,其責(zé)任不僅僅在于機(jī)場(chǎng)本身或者機(jī)場(chǎng)行業(yè)協(xié)會(huì)?!八鼞?yīng)該是國(guó)家乃至國(guó)際層面的公共衛(wèi)生政策的一部分,?!彼f。(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))

譯者:樸成奎

隨著新冠疫情進(jìn)入第三個(gè)年頭,,航空業(yè)也終于等來了復(fù)蘇的跡象,。在2020年4月,全球航空業(yè)的客運(yùn)需求曾經(jīng)一度爆跌近95%,。不過到了2021年,,客運(yùn)航空大概已經(jīng)恢復(fù)到了新冠疫情前40%的水平。

國(guó)際機(jī)場(chǎng)協(xié)會(huì)北美分會(huì)(Airports Council International—North America)的安全事務(wù)高級(jí)副總裁克里斯托弗·比德韋爾說:“各大機(jī)場(chǎng)都做了很多工作,,并且在防疫上做出大量投資,,以確保旅客和工作人員的健康與安全?!?/p>

各大機(jī)場(chǎng)采取的防疫措施在一定程度上提振了消費(fèi)者的信心,,也提高了人們坐飛機(jī)的意愿,但它的效果能夠維持多久,,還要打一個(gè)大大的問號(hào),。新一波奧密克戎毒株的流行再次表明,新冠病毒仍然在持續(xù)進(jìn)化,。另外,,很多專家擔(dān)心它很有可能會(huì)突破新冠疫苗構(gòu)建的免疫屏障。在中短期看來,,奧密克戎毒株是航空業(yè)面臨的最大威脅,。但從長(zhǎng)期來看,下一波疫情大流行的可能仍然不能排除,。

全球機(jī)場(chǎng)行業(yè)是一個(gè)市值高達(dá)1300億美元的龐大市場(chǎng),,光是美國(guó)機(jī)場(chǎng)行業(yè)的市值就達(dá)到了66億美元。而自從新冠疫情爆發(fā)以來,,飛機(jī)和機(jī)場(chǎng)就一直是防疫工作的重點(diǎn)之一,。早在2018年,就有一位新加坡學(xué)者指出,,如果某地爆發(fā)了一場(chǎng)疫情,,至于它能否被控制在本地,還是會(huì)蔓延成一場(chǎng)災(zāi)難性的全球性疫情,,“機(jī)場(chǎng)管理部門就是最后一道防線”,。雖然自新冠疫情爆發(fā)以來,各大機(jī)場(chǎng)都做出了一些變化以重振公眾的信心,,但有專家在研究了機(jī)場(chǎng)在疫情傳播中扮演的角色后表示,,這些措施仍然遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)不夠。

現(xiàn)在的機(jī)場(chǎng),既不像新冠疫情剛爆發(fā)時(shí)那樣宛如“鬼城”般的空無一人,,也不像新冠疫情爆發(fā)前那樣喧囂,。蘇黎世大學(xué)旅行醫(yī)學(xué)中心(University of Zurich’s Centre for Travel Medicine)的教授、世界衛(wèi)生組織旅行者健康合作中心(WHO Collaborating Centre for Travellers’ Health)的主任帕特麗夏·施拉根霍夫指出,,機(jī)場(chǎng)已經(jīng)很好地適應(yīng)了“新常態(tài)”下的一些基本的公共衛(wèi)生限制,。在很多地方的機(jī)場(chǎng),,像戴口罩,、保持社交距離、用有機(jī)玻璃“硬隔離”和放置洗手液等做法都已經(jīng)成了“新常態(tài)”,,跟在超市等場(chǎng)所并沒有什么區(qū)別,。

比德韋爾表示,在新冠疫情爆發(fā)后,,他的公司立即成立了一個(gè)抗疫工作小組,,負(fù)責(zé)指導(dǎo)北美地區(qū)機(jī)場(chǎng)的防疫工作。這個(gè)小組的成員由美國(guó)和加拿大的業(yè)內(nèi)人士組成,,小組里既沒有科學(xué)家,,也沒有緊密追蹤新冠疫情發(fā)展的專業(yè)人員,但是小組成員仍然帶來了一些他們?cè)诠ぷ髦杏龅降膯栴},,同時(shí)該小組也在密切關(guān)注美國(guó)疾病預(yù)防與控制中心(CDC)等公共衛(wèi)生機(jī)構(gòu)的最新指南,。

他的公司還向《財(cái)富》雜志推薦了一份該公司在2020年6月發(fā)布的報(bào)告,這份報(bào)告距今已經(jīng)一年多了,。該報(bào)告是在美國(guó)的新冠疫情蔓延的第一階段撰寫的,,它就美國(guó)如何從新冠疫情中復(fù)蘇也提出了42條高級(jí)別的建議。該報(bào)告提出的一些公共衛(wèi)生領(lǐng)域的干預(yù)政策已經(jīng)得到了落實(shí)——比如用有機(jī)玻璃“硬隔離”,、為經(jīng)濟(jì)復(fù)蘇做好準(zhǔn)備,、保持社交距離、加強(qiáng)消毒等等,。

例如,,現(xiàn)在北美機(jī)場(chǎng)的地面上到處都貼著貼紙,提示人們?cè)谂抨?duì)時(shí)保持距離,,這就是該公司的報(bào)告給出的建議之一,。另外,各大機(jī)場(chǎng)還設(shè)計(jì)了專門的標(biāo)語(yǔ)牌,,提醒乘客戴口罩的重要性,。

不過,不論是在機(jī)場(chǎng)還是在其他場(chǎng)所,,消費(fèi)者是否守規(guī)矩都是一個(gè)大問題,。今年早些時(shí)候,美國(guó)聯(lián)邦航空管理局(Federal Aviation Authority)就指出,,2021年上半年,,該局接到了成千上萬的乘客違規(guī)行為的投訴,,其中有四分之三是關(guān)于乘客不愿意佩戴口罩的。而自2020年年初以來,,美國(guó)就已經(jīng)要求所有人在公共交通場(chǎng)所必須佩戴口罩,。

據(jù)《福布斯》(Forbes)在今年10月的報(bào)道,美國(guó)聯(lián)邦航空管理局已經(jīng)加大了對(duì)這些不守規(guī)矩的乘客的處罰力度,。迄今為止,,光是開出的罰單就超過了100萬美元。但與此同時(shí),,負(fù)責(zé)機(jī)場(chǎng)安全的美國(guó)交通安全管理局(Transportation Security Administration)則只開出了2350美元的罰單,。無獨(dú)有偶,《財(cái)富》雜志的員工在撰寫此文過程中也發(fā)現(xiàn),,美國(guó)和其他一些國(guó)家的多個(gè)機(jī)場(chǎng)并未強(qiáng)制顧客戴口罩,。

比德韋爾表示:“考慮到機(jī)場(chǎng)的占地面積很大,他們也沒有足夠的資源將人手安排在各個(gè)地點(diǎn),?!?/p>

施拉根霍夫建議道,機(jī)場(chǎng)可以應(yīng)用“影像流行病學(xué)”來提高防疫水平,。顧名思義,,就是使用人工智能技術(shù)對(duì)機(jī)場(chǎng)進(jìn)行篩查,看哪些人沒有正確佩戴口罩,。一旦這些人被人工智能鎖定,,它就能夠向機(jī)場(chǎng)工作人員發(fā)送實(shí)時(shí)報(bào)告,提醒哪些人沒有正確佩戴口罩,。施拉根霍夫認(rèn)為,,哪怕人們只是知道有這樣一套系統(tǒng)存在,他們配合防疫的意愿都會(huì)大大提高,。

像戴口罩,、保持社交距離、放置洗手液,、有機(jī)玻璃“硬隔離”這些招術(shù),,在超市這種地方或許夠用,因?yàn)檫@些地方暴露的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)較為有限,,但對(duì)于機(jī)場(chǎng)就不同了,。

塞浦路斯大學(xué)(University of Cyprus)的教授克里斯托·尼克萊德斯專門研究傳染病的傳播方式,他說:“機(jī)場(chǎng)是疫情大流行的一個(gè)重要組成部分,?!笔紫龋瑱C(jī)場(chǎng)是一個(gè)巨大的空間;其次,,來自全國(guó)各地的人都會(huì)聚集在這里,,有的吃吃喝喝,有的還要購(gòu)物,,而這正是傳染病傳播的溫床,。

美國(guó)現(xiàn)在已經(jīng)有了奧密克戎毒株的確診病例,它可以追溯到從南非入境的一名旅客身上,,而這名旅客正是從舊金山國(guó)際機(jī)場(chǎng)(San Francisco International Airport)入境的,。雖然有關(guān)部門都認(rèn)為,該乘客絕非美國(guó)境內(nèi)唯一的一例奧密克戎病例,,但這個(gè)案例也說明了機(jī)場(chǎng)在疫情傳播過程中起了多么重要的作用,。

至于這名乘客(或者是將奧密克戎帶到美國(guó)的其他什么人)入境時(shí)在機(jī)場(chǎng)干了什么,,我們并不知道,。他們有可能吃了一頓飯,在機(jī)場(chǎng)的酒吧里喝了一瓶啤酒,,也有可能買了點(diǎn)東西——這些活動(dòng)都是受到機(jī)場(chǎng)鼓勵(lì)的,。又或許他們只是取了行李,之后就打車離開了,。

現(xiàn)在我們也不知道奧密克戎毒株的傳播性到底有多強(qiáng),,不過可以肯定的是,奧密克戎的傳播性已經(jīng)超過了迄今為止發(fā)現(xiàn)的所有毒株,。世界各地的案例都表明,,它很有可能將成為美國(guó)甚至全世界占主導(dǎo)地位的毒株。有的人可能只是摘下口罩吃了一個(gè)三明治,,或者在排隊(duì)時(shí)沒有戴好口罩,,就很有可能感染其他乘客,導(dǎo)致該毒株在全國(guó)范圍內(nèi)迅速傳播,。

航空業(yè)的復(fù)蘇,,不止關(guān)系著行業(yè)的生死。現(xiàn)在新冠疫情已經(jīng)進(jìn)入第三個(gè)年頭了,,全世界的人都迫切期盼著與家人和朋友的團(tuán)聚,。

施拉根霍夫表示,他在瑞士的診所里的很多人都是“探親訪友者”,,也就是坐飛機(jī)去拜訪親戚和朋友的人,,不過比起新冠疫情以前還是少了很多。

倫敦的上市數(shù)據(jù)分析咨詢公司GlobalData認(rèn)為,,這些“探親訪友”者對(duì)整個(gè)行業(yè)的復(fù)蘇至關(guān)重要,。從歷史數(shù)據(jù)看,探親訪友是人們乘飛機(jī)旅行的第二大原因。該公司認(rèn)為,,雖然2020年,,人們的探親訪友需求下降了超過三分之二,乘坐國(guó)際航班探親訪友的人數(shù)也由大約2.3億人次下降至僅6920萬人次,,但它的增長(zhǎng)幅度預(yù)計(jì)將很快超過休閑旅游,。

施拉根霍夫稱:“這方面的需求是十分強(qiáng)勁的。另外我也認(rèn)為,,‘旅行的自由’也是一項(xiàng)人權(quán),。”

據(jù)悉,,舊金山國(guó)際機(jī)場(chǎng)和美國(guó)的其他三家大型國(guó)際機(jī)場(chǎng)近來已經(jīng)加強(qiáng)了對(duì)奧密克戎毒株的入境檢測(cè),,但這很可能并不足以阻止奧密克戎的傳播,因?yàn)樵摱局旰苡锌赡芤呀?jīng)在美國(guó)隱匿傳播一段時(shí)間了,。愛丁堡大學(xué)(University of Edinburgh)的基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施研究專家,、博士后研究員莫希特·阿羅拉表示,從幾十年前開始,,就有研究流行病學(xué)的專家不斷指出,,機(jī)場(chǎng)行業(yè)并未為流行病爆發(fā)做好準(zhǔn)備。

阿羅拉稱,,迄今為止,,機(jī)場(chǎng)做出的改變大多數(shù)都是很簡(jiǎn)單的——比如安裝洗手液盒等等,這些措施主要還是著眼機(jī)場(chǎng)的經(jīng)濟(jì)利益,。例如在自助身份認(rèn)證上,,只要將掃描攝像頭旋轉(zhuǎn)360度即可完成。美國(guó)交通安全管理局已經(jīng)在一些地區(qū)試點(diǎn)了自助認(rèn)證等服務(wù),,從而減少了旅客與機(jī)場(chǎng)方面的接觸,,而這也是航空業(yè)冀希望發(fā)展的一個(gè)方向。

“在某此程度上,,這些措施是有幫助的,。”阿羅拉說,。同時(shí)他也表示,,目前要做的事情還有很多,而且我們面臨的也并非是一個(gè)新問題,。在2009年的H1N1流感大流行期間,,甚至在2002年至2003年的“非典”(SARS)期間,“人們就對(duì)防疫政策進(jìn)行過重大討論,?!?/p>

直到新冠疫情期間,,這些政策討論仍然在繼續(xù),不過它著眼的并非只是當(dāng)前的疫情,。接受本刊采訪的專家們表示,,當(dāng)前政策討論的重點(diǎn)是要為未來做好準(zhǔn)備,特別是隨著時(shí)代的發(fā)展,,未來公眾對(duì)傳染病的暴露風(fēng)險(xiǎn)或許比以往還要高得多,。

有些專家提出的政策則更為激進(jìn),比新冠疫情以來機(jī)場(chǎng)采取的措施力度更大,,但或許的確能夠降低病毒的傳播速度,。比如塞浦路斯大學(xué)的教授尼克萊德斯就主張根據(jù)乘客的來源地和目的地進(jìn)行進(jìn)一步的隔離。

她說:“這樣你就可以了解發(fā)生了什么,?!碑?dāng)然,這種做法會(huì)顯著減少乘客的購(gòu)物行為,,而零售收入則占到了全球機(jī)場(chǎng)總收入的40%左右,。

另外,阿羅拉還指出了一個(gè)空間的問題,。很多時(shí)候,,乘客為了保持社交距離,會(huì)導(dǎo)致排隊(duì)排得特別的長(zhǎng),,從而升高了機(jī)場(chǎng)的暴露風(fēng)險(xiǎn),抵消了保持社交距離所帶來的一些好處,。針對(duì)這種情況,,機(jī)場(chǎng)不妨采取錯(cuò)峰登機(jī)或者分散排隊(duì)的方式,,來降低乘客的暴露風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。

施拉根霍夫表示,,目前,機(jī)場(chǎng)需要做出的最大的改變就是標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化,?!叭藗冃枰浅C鞔_的信息?!彼f,。

比德韋爾坦承,到目前為止,,包括標(biāo)志標(biāo)識(shí)在內(nèi)的很多機(jī)場(chǎng)防疫措施尚未達(dá)到標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化,?!安煌臋C(jī)場(chǎng)有不同的標(biāo)志?!彼f,。也就是說,乘客到了一個(gè)陌生的環(huán)境,,還會(huì)遇到一些陌生的規(guī)定,,甚至就連標(biāo)志都跟其他機(jī)場(chǎng)不一樣,而這必然會(huì)降低防疫的效率和安全性,。

施拉根霍夫指出,,標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化需要包括標(biāo)志標(biāo)識(shí),但也遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)不止標(biāo)志標(biāo)識(shí)這么簡(jiǎn)單,。消費(fèi)者從購(gòu)買機(jī)票的那一秒起,,他就必然會(huì)和整個(gè)全球航空網(wǎng)絡(luò)的方方面面發(fā)生接觸,哪怕只是從紐約州的羅切斯特飛到紐約市,。因此,,機(jī)場(chǎng)的防疫指南必須考慮到全球暴露的問題?!帮L(fēng)險(xiǎn)不光是從機(jī)場(chǎng)開始,,而是在整個(gè)旅行當(dāng)中。所以乘客都存在與旅行相關(guān)的暴露風(fēng)險(xiǎn),?!?/p>

這也意味著機(jī)場(chǎng)必須得在思想上做出重大轉(zhuǎn)變。阿羅拉表示,,現(xiàn)在的機(jī)場(chǎng)普遍沒有完成思想上的轉(zhuǎn)變,,現(xiàn)在大家基本上還是延襲新冠疫情前的那一套,只是在防疫上出臺(tái)了一些新措施,?!岸@并不是商業(yè)模式上的真正轉(zhuǎn)變?!?/p>

今年早些時(shí)候,,美國(guó)各大機(jī)場(chǎng)通過拜登的《基建法案》成功拿到了200億美元的聯(lián)邦撥款。比德韋爾指出,,其中一些錢已經(jīng)被個(gè)別機(jī)場(chǎng)花在了防疫措施上,,不過他的公司并不知道相應(yīng)開銷的具體數(shù)額。

公平地說,,為了適應(yīng)疫情以來的“新常態(tài)”,,各大機(jī)場(chǎng)確實(shí)花了不少力氣,也投入了不少真金白銀,。在撰寫本文的過程中,,《財(cái)富》雜志先后采訪了美國(guó)的十個(gè)最大的機(jī)場(chǎng),,從它們向《財(cái)富》雜志提供的博文、媒體通稿和宣傳信息看,,它們?cè)谶^去兩年間確實(shí)做出了不小的改變,。

有些機(jī)場(chǎng)改進(jìn)了空調(diào)和通風(fēng)系統(tǒng),使其通風(fēng)效率提高了60%至100%——比如菲尼克斯天港國(guó)際機(jī)場(chǎng)(Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport),。該機(jī)場(chǎng)的發(fā)言人希瑟·謝爾布拉克在電子郵件中對(duì)《財(cái)富》雜志表示:“我們通過樓宇自動(dòng)化系統(tǒng),,加強(qiáng)了對(duì)400個(gè)空氣處理器中的34000多個(gè)濾芯的監(jiān)測(cè)和評(píng)估?!绷硗?,該機(jī)場(chǎng)獲得的聯(lián)邦撥款已經(jīng)被用于“償還債務(wù)、減免優(yōu)惠和運(yùn)營(yíng)支出”,。

邁阿密國(guó)際機(jī)場(chǎng)(Miami International Airport)指出,,2020年和2021年,它連續(xù)兩年獲得了國(guó)際機(jī)場(chǎng)協(xié)會(huì)頒發(fā)的“機(jī)場(chǎng)健康認(rèn)證”,。該機(jī)場(chǎng)的運(yùn)營(yíng)副總監(jiān)丹·阿戈斯蒂諾和特別項(xiàng)目運(yùn)營(yíng)主管杰西卡·馬林也在今年秋季的申請(qǐng)書中指出了機(jī)場(chǎng)面臨的一些困難,。

“……根據(jù)美國(guó)疾病預(yù)防與控制中心的建議,在可能的情況下,,機(jī)場(chǎng)要盡量鼓勵(lì)乘客保持距離,。但是由于客流量的增加,它只在有限的時(shí)間和地點(diǎn)可行,。”

機(jī)場(chǎng)的主觀能動(dòng)性畢竟是有限的。阿羅拉表示,,受市場(chǎng)力量影響,,他主張的很多防疫措施是不太可能被航空業(yè)主動(dòng)采用的?!爱?dāng)你走進(jìn)機(jī)場(chǎng)時(shí),,多數(shù)時(shí)候你就像一件傳送帶上的商品,只能任機(jī)場(chǎng)擺布,。然而事實(shí)證明,,在新冠疫情這樣的環(huán)境里,這種心態(tài)是十分危險(xiǎn)的,?!?/p>

施拉根霍夫認(rèn)為,,要想讓機(jī)場(chǎng)行業(yè)加大防疫力度,采取正確的防疫措施,,其責(zé)任不僅僅在于機(jī)場(chǎng)本身或者機(jī)場(chǎng)行業(yè)協(xié)會(huì),?!八鼞?yīng)該是國(guó)家乃至國(guó)際層面的公共衛(wèi)生政策的一部分?!彼f,。(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))

譯者:樸成奎

As the pandemic slouches toward its third year, flying is making a comeback of sorts. From the crater of April 2020, when the global industry saw overall demand decline by nearly 95%, passenger air travel has built back up to an estimated 40% of pre-pandemic levels in 2021.

“Airports have done a lot and invested significantly in measures to provide for the health and safety of air travelers and workers,” says Christopher Bidwell, senior VP of security for Airports Council International—North America (ACI-NA).

The actions taken by airports have helped to enhance consumer confidence and raised people’s willingness to fly once more. But some of those gains may prove short-lived. The Omicron variant of COVID-19 has provided yet more evidence that this disease will keep evolving and may, many scientists fear, escape the guards available to vaccinated individuals. Beyond this short- and medium-term issue looms the prospect of the next pandemic.

Airplanes have been a central focus of public scrutiny, but airports themselves—which in 2021 represented a $130 billion global market segment and a $6.6 billion U.S. segment—are an integral part of the picture when it comes to pandemic safety. Airport authorities “remain as the last line of defense between controllable local outbreak and catastrophic global pandemic,” wrote one Singaporean academic in 2018. While airports have made a number of changes in an attempt to restore public confidence since the COVID-19 pandemic began, experts who study the role these institutions play in the spread of infectious disease say far more is needed.

A visit to an airport today looks different from either the zombie-movie emptiness of the first phase of the pandemic or the bustle of pre-pandemic days. Airports have done a reasonable job adapting to the basic public health restrictions of the new normal, says Patricia Schlagenhauf, a professor at the University of Zurich’s Centre for Travel Medicine and codirector of the WHO Collaborating Centre for Travellers’ Health. In many places, norms like wearing masks and social distancing rules, plexiglass barriers, and hand sanitizer stands have all become par for the course in airports just like they have in grocery stores.

After the pandemic started, Bidwell says his organization quickly convened a panel to issue advice to North American airports. That panel, composed of industry members from the U.S. and Canada, doesn’t have a scientist on staff or someone whose dedicated job it is to keep abreast of developments. Instead, says Bidwell, the members of the panel bring studies they’ve encountered in their work. The panel also watches for new guidelines from public health agencies such as the CDC, he says.

His organization referred Fortune to a report it produced in June 2020, more than a year ago. That document, written in the first phase of what has proved to be a much longer public health emergency than originally anticipated, contains 42 high-level recommendations for recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. The public health interventions it calls for—plexiglass, preparations for recovery from the bottom of the slump, physical distancing, enhanced cleaning—are already underway.

In one of the first moves, says Bidwell, airports across North America began spotting their floor with now-ubiquitous stickers that illustrate how far apart people ought to stand. They also devised signage to remind passengers of the importance of wearing masks.

In airports, as in those other settings, compliance remains an issue. Earlier this year, the Federal Aviation Authority reported that three-quarters of the thousands of reports of unruly passenger behavior it received in the first half of 2021 were the result of airline passengers refusing to comply with the federal mask mandate, which has been in force in transportation networks across the U.S. since early 2020.

The FAA has been active in fining unruly passengers, Forbes reported in October, issuing more than $1 million in fines. But the Transportation Security Administration, which oversees airport security, has issued a total of only $2,350 in fines. Anecdotally, Fortune staff who worked on this story have also observed mask-wearing not being enforced at a number of airports both in the U.S. and elsewhere.

“Given the significant real estate at airports, they don’t have the resources to put people at every location,” says Bidwell.

Schlagenhauf has one suggestion for improving the status quo: photo-epidemiology. This process involves using artificial intelligence to scan the airport, looking for people who aren’t properly wearing a mask. Once those people have been identified by the A.I., it can send real airport employees to remind the non-mask wearers. Even the knowledge that such a system is in place would likely increase compliance, she says.

*****

Mask-wearing, distancing, hand sanitizer, plexiglass: These kinds of interventions are sufficient in places like grocery stores, where exposure to disease is limited. But airports are different.

“Airports are very important building blocks of a pandemic,” says Christos Nicolaides, a professor at the University of Cyprus who studies how contagions spread. Big spaces where crowds of people coming and going from different parts of the country or world mix, eat, and shop: It’s a recipe for spreading contagious diseases quickly, he says.

The Omicron variant’s entry into the U.S. was linked to a single passenger who returned from South Africa, the first country to detect the variant, through San Francisco International Airport. Authorities believe the passenger wasn’t the only case in the U.S., but this case highlights the important role airports play as centers for disease transmission.

We don’t know what that passenger, or the others who introduced the Omicron variant to the U.S., did at the airport when they arrived in the country. Perhaps they had a meal between flights, drank a beer at the airport bar, or did some shopping—all activities that airports encourage a captive audience of passengers to take part in. Maybe they stopped just long enough to pick up their luggage from the carousel and catch a cab.

We also don’t know yet exactly how contagious Omicron is, though it’s safe to say it is far more transmissible than any other variant yet found. It’s on the rise in the United States, and examples around the world suggest it may become dominant here and globally. Individuals taking some maskless moments to eat a sandwich or not wearing a face covering properly in the reentry line could have infected other passengers and sent the variant spiraling across the country.

Getting airports right matters for far more than just the air industry’s bottom line. As the pandemic stretches into its third year, families and friends around the world are desperate to reunite.

At her clinic in Switzerland, Schlagenhauf says a significant fraction of the people she sees—a load still far reduced from before the pandemic—are “VFR travelers”—people flying in order to visit friends and relatives.

GlobalData, a publicly traded data and analytics consulting company based in London, estimates that VFR travel—historically the second most common reason to take a flight, after leisure travel—will be “vital” to the industry’s recovery. It expects to see VFR’s growth outpace that of leisure travel after declining by more than two-thirds in 2020, from approximately 230 million international departures to just 69.2 million.

“That’s a very strong need,” Schlagenhauf says, “and I think it’s also a human right, to be able to travel.”

*****

SFO and three other large international airports have now enhanced screening for Omicron, but it likely won’t be enough to contain the variant, which is already circulating within the country. Scientists who study pandemic prep have been warning for decades that airports aren’t prepared for pandemics, says Mohit Arora, a postdoctoral researcher who studies infrastructure at the University of Edinburgh.

The changes that airports have made so far have largely been the simple ones—installing hand sanitizer dispensers being one example—and those that most align with their economic goals, says Arora. Take passengers self-scanning their identification, something that Bidwell says was accomplished by simply rotating the existing scanners 360 degrees. Self-scanning and the self-serve TSA kiosks that are being piloted in several sites throughout the country have reduced contact between travelers and the airport, he says, but it was also a direction that the air travel industry was trying to move in anyway.

“To some extent, these measures are helpful,” Arora says. But, he says, there’s a lot more that needs to be done, and the problem isn’t a new one. During the 2009 H1N1 pandemic and even earlier, during the SARS outbreak of 2002–2003, “there have been significant debates about pandemic policy,” he says.

Those debates are ongoing during the COVID-19 pandemic as well. But they’re not just about the current emergency, the experts interviewed for this story say: They’re about long-term preparation for a world where the probability of pandemic illness exposure for the public is much higher than it has been in previous eras.

Some of the policies that those who study airports have called for would result in much bigger changes to airports than have happened so far during this pandemic, but could result in much lower disease spread. Nicolaides is an advocate for the idea of siloing passengers further, based on where they came from and where they’re going.

“That way you can keep track of what’s going on,” the University of Cyprus professor says. Of course, that measure would also seriously decrease passenger exposure to retail, which accounts for about 40% of revenue across airports globally.

In addition, there’s a fundamental space issue in airports, says Arora, and it’s leading to incredibly long lines as passengers try to find enough space to social distance while queuing. That issue undoes many of the gains of having less contact when someone does eventually make it to the front of the line, he says. Measures like timed entry and more divided queues could change the degree of exposure.

The biggest change that’s needed, says Schlagenhauf, is standardization. “People need really clear information,” she says.

Right now, Bidwell acknowledges, measures like signage aren’t standardized. “Different airports have different brandings,” he says. That means travelers are encountering an unfamiliar environment with new and specific rules, and even the signs may look quite different from other airports, something that has been shown to decrease efficiency and safety in other traffic control contexts.

Standardization needs to include signage but go far beyond it, Schlagenhauf says. The second a passenger buys a plane ticket, that person is inherently part of a network that touches nearly every point on the globe, even if they personally are going only from Rochester, N.Y., to New York City. She says the guidelines for safety should be coordinated with that global exposure in mind. “The risk doesn’t just start at the airport. It’s the whole journey,” she says. “All travelers are associated with travel-related infection exposure.”

That’s a major change in thinking. These kinds of endeavors have not been widely undertaken by airports, says Arora. Presently, he says, the status quo is to do what was done before the pandemic, but with some new precautions. “That’s not really a change in business model,” he says.

Earlier this year, U.S. airports received $20 billion in federal support as part of President Biden’s infrastructure deal. Some of that money has been spent on these pandemic safety measures by individual airports, says Bidwell, but his organization doesn’t know how much or how exactly it was spent.

In fairness, airports have put real work—and real money—into adapting. Many of the top 10 airports in the U.S. contacted for this story referred Fortune to their blogs, press releases, and customer-facing information, all of which demonstrated the degree of change they have made in the past two years.

Some modified their HVAC system, as in the case of Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, to turn over 60% to 100% more air. In addition, “we have increased monitoring and condition assessment of more than 34,000 filters in more than 400 air handlers through our building automation system,” spokesperson Heather Shelbrack told Fortune in an email. The federal money that the airport received was spent on “debt service payments, concessions relief, and operation expenses,” she said in the email.

Miami International Airport highlighted the fact it worked to earn ACI World’s annual airport health accreditation in 2020 and 2021, succeeding both years. In the application from this fall, shared with Fortune, Dan Agostino, the airport’s assistant director of operations, and Jessica Marin, operations special projects administrator, identify some of the difficulties airports face.

“…Wherever possible the airport tries to encourage physical distancing, per CDC recommendation,” they note. “However, due to increase in traffic, it is only feasible in limited times and locations.”

But they can only do so much on their own. Arora says the market forces that drive air travel mean that the bigger disease prevention measures he advocates are unlikely to be adopted by industry on its own. “When you enter an airport, most of the time you’re processed like a commodity,” he says. “That mindset has proven to be very dangerous in an environment like a pandemic.”

Accountability for getting airports right stretches far beyond individual airport owners and the associations that represent them, says Schlagenhauf. “It’s all part of the public health response on a national level and an international level,” she says.

財(cái)富中文網(wǎng)所刊載內(nèi)容之知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)為財(cái)富媒體知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)有限公司及/或相關(guān)權(quán)利人專屬所有或持有。未經(jīng)許可,,禁止進(jìn)行轉(zhuǎn)載,、摘編、復(fù)制及建立鏡像等任何使用,。
0條Plus
精彩評(píng)論
評(píng)論

撰寫或查看更多評(píng)論

請(qǐng)打開財(cái)富Plus APP

前往打開
熱讀文章