新冠病毒重大發(fā)現(xiàn),或?qū)?lái)全新抗病毒藥物

英國(guó)研究人員稱(chēng),,他們已經(jīng)取得了一項(xiàng)突破性發(fā)現(xiàn),可能會(huì)對(duì)戰(zhàn)勝新冠病毒有所幫助,。其他專(zhuān)家則持謹(jǐn)慎態(tài)度,,并警告稱(chēng),潛在藥物開(kāi)發(fā)可能需要很長(zhǎng)時(shí)間才可以完成,,但他們也表示,,該發(fā)現(xiàn)至少能夠幫助我們更好地認(rèn)識(shí)和了解這種病毒。
從大家熟悉的新型冠狀病毒圖示可以看出,,該病毒的表面遍布刺突,。這種所謂的“纖突蛋白”能夠與人體細(xì)胞表面結(jié)合,進(jìn)而導(dǎo)致感染,。
布里斯托大學(xué)的研究人員在試管中制造出這種纖突蛋白后,,通過(guò)新近開(kāi)發(fā)的“低溫電子顯微鏡成像技術(shù)”對(duì)其進(jìn)行了極微距觀(guān)察,并借助云端處理工具構(gòu)建了3D架構(gòu),,以便研究人員對(duì)其進(jìn)行進(jìn)一步研究,。

研究人員驚喜地發(fā)現(xiàn),,其結(jié)構(gòu)中有一種包含亞油酸分子的“口袋”。亞油酸是一種人體維持健康所必須的物質(zhì),,一般從食物中獲得,。
雖然人體不能產(chǎn)生亞油酸,但無(wú)論是保持細(xì)胞膜的流動(dòng)性,、維持肺部吸收氧氣的能力,、生產(chǎn)前列腺素等物質(zhì),還是防止心血管系統(tǒng)出現(xiàn)炎癥都離不開(kāi)亞油酸,。
新冠肺炎癥狀包括廣泛的炎癥反應(yīng)和呼吸窘迫現(xiàn)象,。此外,研究表明,,新冠肺炎患者體內(nèi)的亞油酸水平較正常人為低,。這些證據(jù)表明,新冠病毒會(huì)搜尋,、借助亞油酸分子實(shí)現(xiàn)在人體內(nèi)部的傳播,,并在此過(guò)程中對(duì)人體造成傷害。
該研究的共同負(fù)責(zé)人伊姆雷?伯杰在一份聲明中說(shuō):“我們對(duì)自己的發(fā)現(xiàn)及其意義感到頗為困惑,。新冠肺炎會(huì)導(dǎo)致患者出現(xiàn)多種功能失調(diào)的癥狀,,(如果無(wú)法解決)可能會(huì)造成嚴(yán)重后果,而亞油酸恰恰是維持這些功能正常運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)的關(guān)鍵物質(zhì),。我們的數(shù)據(jù)顯示,,作為這一切問(wèn)題的罪魁禍?zhǔn)祝鹿诓《緯?huì)捕獲并保留亞油酸分子,,導(dǎo)致人體喪失大部分的防御能力,。”
“抗疫”重大發(fā)現(xiàn)
我??茖W(xué)家@maxplanckbris在新冠病毒組織結(jié)構(gòu)中新發(fā)現(xiàn)了一個(gè)可以阻止其感染人類(lèi)細(xì)胞的藥物靶點(diǎn),,這一發(fā)現(xiàn)或?qū)⒊蔀閼?zhàn)勝疫情的“決定性因素”
- 布里斯托大學(xué)(@Bristoluni),2020年9月22日
布里斯托大學(xué)研究團(tuán)隊(duì)希望能夠利用新冠病毒與亞油酸的這種關(guān)系讓新冠病毒“自廢武功”,,該團(tuán)隊(duì)的想法是用全新小分子抗病毒藥物填滿(mǎn)新冠病毒的“藥物親和靶袋”,,這樣,當(dāng)冠狀病毒進(jìn)入人體后,,由于喪失了傳播力,,就會(huì)變成不具有傳染性的“啞彈”。
在接受《財(cái)富》雜志采訪(fǎng)時(shí),,伯杰表示,,現(xiàn)在有兩種可行的臨床路線(xiàn)。
伯杰說(shuō),,短期內(nèi)可以考慮將亞油酸與瑞德西韋等藥物聯(lián)合使用,。瑞德西韋是吉利德公司生產(chǎn)的一種藥物,能夠抑制病毒中的另一種蛋白質(zhì),,臨床結(jié)果證明,,這種藥物可以縮短一些病人的住院恢復(fù)時(shí)間。
他還表示,,亞油酸沒(méi)有毒性,,而大多數(shù)新冠治療備選藥物都有一定的副作用,加入亞油酸或?qū)⒛軌颉霸跍p少其他藥物用量的同時(shí)達(dá)到同樣的治療效果,?!?/p>
從長(zhǎng)期來(lái)看,伯杰則認(rèn)為,,也許還可以找到一種“比亞油酸更擅于封閉纖突蛋白”的分子,,雖然纖突蛋白的“藥物親和靶袋”似乎與亞油酸“天生一對(duì)”,,但這并不意味著其對(duì)其它物質(zhì)就會(huì)“閉門(mén)不見(jiàn)”。
也就是說(shuō)能夠開(kāi)發(fā)一種用于治療新冠肺炎的新藥,。
特制藥物
倫敦衛(wèi)生與熱帶醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)院的藥物流行病學(xué)教授斯蒂芬?埃文斯在通過(guò)科學(xué)媒體中心發(fā)布的一份聲明中表示,,即便(制藥企業(yè)能基于)布里斯托研究團(tuán)隊(duì)的發(fā)現(xiàn)開(kāi)發(fā)出藥品,公眾也不應(yīng)期待這種藥品可以很快面世,。
但他也表示,,如果其他措施均無(wú)法成功應(yīng)對(duì)冠狀病毒,那么該發(fā)現(xiàn)將會(huì)很有價(jià)值,。
埃文斯說(shuō):“新藥的開(kāi)發(fā)成本一般都很高,,而且開(kāi)發(fā)周期也比較長(zhǎng)。由于新藥不像疫苗那樣能夠在已有疫苗的基礎(chǔ)上進(jìn)行開(kāi)發(fā),,所以開(kāi)發(fā)周期可能比疫苗還要長(zhǎng),。如果疫苗和其他防護(hù)措施均無(wú)法根除或控制新冠疫情,那么這一發(fā)現(xiàn)將會(huì)在更遠(yuǎn)的未來(lái)給人類(lèi)帶來(lái)希望,?!?/p>
對(duì)于布里斯托研究小組提到的瑞德西韋的相關(guān)性,埃文斯指出,,目前尚無(wú)瑞德西韋“可以顯著降低死亡率”的證據(jù),。
伯杰表示:“我們面對(duì)的是一場(chǎng)疫情大流行,目前還沒(méi)有真正有效的應(yīng)對(duì)辦法,。我們當(dāng)然希望也祈禱這些疫苗能夠奏效,,但誰(shuí)都無(wú)法保證其效果。經(jīng)過(guò)30年的研究,,我們還沒(méi)有研制出(艾滋?。┮呙纾?lián)合抗病毒藥物卻確實(shí)發(fā)揮了作用,?!?/p>
至于布里斯托大學(xué)的論文是否可能為新冠肺炎帶來(lái)新的獨(dú)立療法,研究人員指出,,(此前曾經(jīng)有研究人員)在導(dǎo)致感冒的鼻病毒中發(fā)現(xiàn)了一種脂肪酸,,隨后便有制藥企業(yè)基于該發(fā)現(xiàn)成功開(kāi)發(fā)出了一種名為普樂(lè)康尼(pleconaril)的抗病毒藥物,該藥在試驗(yàn)中被證明具有一定療效,,并被允許用于緊急情況,,不過(guò)該藥也有一定副作用,所以并未在更大范圍推廣使用,。
帝國(guó)理工學(xué)院的病毒學(xué)審稿人邁克爾?斯金納在科學(xué)媒體中心對(duì)布里斯托論文做出的回應(yīng)中表示:“對(duì)特制藥物而言,,新冠病毒的亞油酸結(jié)合靶袋將會(huì)成為頗有吸引力的攻關(guān)目標(biāo),鼻病毒篩檢中用到的一些藥物在此方面或許也會(huì)大有用武之地?!?/p>
斯金納說(shuō):“藥物開(kāi)發(fā),、測(cè)試可能要費(fèi)一些時(shí)間,而且效果可能也比較有限,,或者可能需要在感染后不久服用(才能起到效果),。除非是經(jīng)過(guò)測(cè)試且毒理明確的藥物,否則還需要對(duì)可能出現(xiàn)的副作用進(jìn)行認(rèn)真測(cè)試,。”
盡管如此,,斯金納和其他評(píng)論者也都指出,,布里斯托小組在業(yè)內(nèi)有著良好的聲譽(yù),并且也使用了可靠的技術(shù)來(lái)支撐自己的發(fā)現(xiàn),。(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:梁宇
審校:夏林
英國(guó)研究人員稱(chēng),,他們已經(jīng)取得了一項(xiàng)突破性發(fā)現(xiàn),可能會(huì)對(duì)戰(zhàn)勝新冠病毒有所幫助,。其他專(zhuān)家則持謹(jǐn)慎態(tài)度,,并警告稱(chēng),潛在藥物開(kāi)發(fā)可能需要很長(zhǎng)時(shí)間才可以完成,,但他們也表示,,該發(fā)現(xiàn)至少能夠幫助我們更好地認(rèn)識(shí)和了解這種病毒。
從大家熟悉的新型冠狀病毒圖示可以看出,,該病毒的表面遍布刺突,。這種所謂的“纖突蛋白”能夠與人體細(xì)胞表面結(jié)合,進(jìn)而導(dǎo)致感染,。
布里斯托大學(xué)的研究人員在試管中制造出這種纖突蛋白后,,通過(guò)新近開(kāi)發(fā)的“低溫電子顯微鏡成像技術(shù)”對(duì)其進(jìn)行了極微距觀(guān)察,并借助云端處理工具構(gòu)建了3D架構(gòu),,以便研究人員對(duì)其進(jìn)行進(jìn)一步研究,。
冠狀病毒纖突蛋白的3D模型,由布里斯托大學(xué)研究團(tuán)隊(duì)制作,。
研究人員驚喜地發(fā)現(xiàn),,其結(jié)構(gòu)中有一種包含亞油酸分子的“口袋”。亞油酸是一種人體維持健康所必須的物質(zhì),,一般從食物中獲得,。
雖然人體不能產(chǎn)生亞油酸,但無(wú)論是保持細(xì)胞膜的流動(dòng)性,、維持肺部吸收氧氣的能力,、生產(chǎn)前列腺素等物質(zhì),還是防止心血管系統(tǒng)出現(xiàn)炎癥都離不開(kāi)亞油酸。
新冠肺炎癥狀包括廣泛的炎癥反應(yīng)和呼吸窘迫現(xiàn)象,。此外,,研究表明,新冠肺炎患者體內(nèi)的亞油酸水平較正常人為低,。這些證據(jù)表明,,新冠病毒會(huì)搜尋、借助亞油酸分子實(shí)現(xiàn)在人體內(nèi)部的傳播,,并在此過(guò)程中對(duì)人體造成傷害,。
該研究的共同負(fù)責(zé)人伊姆雷?伯杰在一份聲明中說(shuō):“我們對(duì)自己的發(fā)現(xiàn)及其意義感到頗為困惑。新冠肺炎會(huì)導(dǎo)致患者出現(xiàn)多種功能失調(diào)的癥狀,,(如果無(wú)法解決)可能會(huì)造成嚴(yán)重后果,,而亞油酸恰恰是維持這些功能正常運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)的關(guān)鍵物質(zhì)。我們的數(shù)據(jù)顯示,,作為這一切問(wèn)題的罪魁禍?zhǔn)?,新冠病毒?huì)捕獲并保留亞油酸分子,導(dǎo)致人體喪失大部分的防御能力,?!?/p>
“抗疫”重大發(fā)現(xiàn)
我校科學(xué)家@maxplanckbris在新冠病毒組織結(jié)構(gòu)中新發(fā)現(xiàn)了一個(gè)可以阻止其感染人類(lèi)細(xì)胞的藥物靶點(diǎn),,這一發(fā)現(xiàn)或?qū)⒊蔀閼?zhàn)勝疫情的“決定性因素”
- 布里斯托大學(xué)(@Bristoluni),,2020年9月22日
布里斯托大學(xué)研究團(tuán)隊(duì)希望能夠利用新冠病毒與亞油酸的這種關(guān)系讓新冠病毒“自廢武功”,該團(tuán)隊(duì)的想法是用全新小分子抗病毒藥物填滿(mǎn)新冠病毒的“藥物親和靶袋”,,這樣,,當(dāng)冠狀病毒進(jìn)入人體后,由于喪失了傳播力,,就會(huì)變成不具有傳染性的“啞彈”,。
在接受《財(cái)富》雜志采訪(fǎng)時(shí),伯杰表示,,現(xiàn)在有兩種可行的臨床路線(xiàn),。
伯杰說(shuō),短期內(nèi)可以考慮將亞油酸與瑞德西韋等藥物聯(lián)合使用,。瑞德西韋是吉利德公司生產(chǎn)的一種藥物,,能夠抑制病毒中的另一種蛋白質(zhì),臨床結(jié)果證明,,這種藥物可以縮短一些病人的住院恢復(fù)時(shí)間,。
他還表示,亞油酸沒(méi)有毒性,,而大多數(shù)新冠治療備選藥物都有一定的副作用,,加入亞油酸或?qū)⒛軌颉霸跍p少其他藥物用量的同時(shí)達(dá)到同樣的治療效果,。”
從長(zhǎng)期來(lái)看,,伯杰則認(rèn)為,,也許還可以找到一種“比亞油酸更擅于封閉纖突蛋白”的分子,雖然纖突蛋白的“藥物親和靶袋”似乎與亞油酸“天生一對(duì)”,,但這并不意味著其對(duì)其它物質(zhì)就會(huì)“閉門(mén)不見(jiàn)”,。
也就是說(shuō)能夠開(kāi)發(fā)一種用于治療新冠肺炎的新藥。
特制藥物
倫敦衛(wèi)生與熱帶醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)院的藥物流行病學(xué)教授斯蒂芬?埃文斯在通過(guò)科學(xué)媒體中心發(fā)布的一份聲明中表示,,即便(制藥企業(yè)能基于)布里斯托研究團(tuán)隊(duì)的發(fā)現(xiàn)開(kāi)發(fā)出藥品,,公眾也不應(yīng)期待這種藥品可以很快面世。
但他也表示,,如果其他措施均無(wú)法成功應(yīng)對(duì)冠狀病毒,,那么該發(fā)現(xiàn)將會(huì)很有價(jià)值。
埃文斯說(shuō):“新藥的開(kāi)發(fā)成本一般都很高,,而且開(kāi)發(fā)周期也比較長(zhǎng)。由于新藥不像疫苗那樣能夠在已有疫苗的基礎(chǔ)上進(jìn)行開(kāi)發(fā),,所以開(kāi)發(fā)周期可能比疫苗還要長(zhǎng),。如果疫苗和其他防護(hù)措施均無(wú)法根除或控制新冠疫情,那么這一發(fā)現(xiàn)將會(huì)在更遠(yuǎn)的未來(lái)給人類(lèi)帶來(lái)希望,?!?/p>
對(duì)于布里斯托研究小組提到的瑞德西韋的相關(guān)性,埃文斯指出,,目前尚無(wú)瑞德西韋“可以顯著降低死亡率”的證據(jù),。
伯杰表示:“我們面對(duì)的是一場(chǎng)疫情大流行,目前還沒(méi)有真正有效的應(yīng)對(duì)辦法,。我們當(dāng)然希望也祈禱這些疫苗能夠奏效,,但誰(shuí)都無(wú)法保證其效果。經(jīng)過(guò)30年的研究,,我們還沒(méi)有研制出(艾滋?。┮呙纾?lián)合抗病毒藥物卻確實(shí)發(fā)揮了作用,?!?/p>
至于布里斯托大學(xué)的論文是否可能為新冠肺炎帶來(lái)新的獨(dú)立療法,研究人員指出,,(此前曾經(jīng)有研究人員)在導(dǎo)致感冒的鼻病毒中發(fā)現(xiàn)了一種脂肪酸,,隨后便有制藥企業(yè)基于該發(fā)現(xiàn)成功開(kāi)發(fā)出了一種名為普樂(lè)康尼(pleconaril)的抗病毒藥物,該藥在試驗(yàn)中被證明具有一定療效,,并被允許用于緊急情況,,不過(guò)該藥也有一定副作用,,所以并未在更大范圍推廣使用。
帝國(guó)理工學(xué)院的病毒學(xué)審稿人邁克爾?斯金納在科學(xué)媒體中心對(duì)布里斯托論文做出的回應(yīng)中表示:“對(duì)特制藥物而言,,新冠病毒的亞油酸結(jié)合靶袋將會(huì)成為頗有吸引力的攻關(guān)目標(biāo),,鼻病毒篩檢中用到的一些藥物在此方面或許也會(huì)大有用武之地?!?/p>
斯金納說(shuō):“藥物開(kāi)發(fā),、測(cè)試可能要費(fèi)一些時(shí)間,而且效果可能也比較有限,,或者可能需要在感染后不久服用(才能起到效果),。除非是經(jīng)過(guò)測(cè)試且毒理明確的藥物,否則還需要對(duì)可能出現(xiàn)的副作用進(jìn)行認(rèn)真測(cè)試,?!?/p>
盡管如此,斯金納和其他評(píng)論者也都指出,,布里斯托小組在業(yè)內(nèi)有著良好的聲譽(yù),,并且也使用了可靠的技術(shù)來(lái)支撐自己的發(fā)現(xiàn)。(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:梁宇
審校:夏林
Researchers in England say they have made a breakthrough finding that could help defeat the novel coronavirus. Other experts are cautious—they warn potential drug development could take a long time—but say it’s at least a step toward a better understanding of the virus.
As now-familiar images of SARS-CoV-2 show, the virus’s surface is covered with spikes. These so-called spike proteins are able to bind to the surfaces of human cells, leading to infection.
After producing these spike proteins in a test tube, researchers from the University of Bristol took a very close look using a recently developed imaging technique called cryo–electron microscopy, with cloud-based processes, building a 3D structure that they could then examine.
The structure contained a surprise: pockets containing molecules of an essential fatty acid called linoleic acid (LA), which we absorb via food, and which we need to stay healthy.
Though our bodies don’t make it, they need LA to keep cell membranes fluid, so our lungs can take in oxygen, and to produce substances such as prostaglandin that protect against inflammation in the cardiovascular system.
COVID-19’s symptoms include widespread inflammation and respiratory distress. And studies have shown that people suffering from the disease have lower LA levels than normal. That suggests the virus is scavenging for LA molecules, using them to spread, and harming us in the process.
“We were truly puzzled by our discovery and its implications,” said Imre Berger, who co-led the study, in a statement. “So here we have LA, a molecule which is at the center of those functions that go haywire in COVID-19 patients, with terrible consequences. And the virus that is causing all this chaos, according to our data, grabs and holds on to exactly this molecule—basically disarming much of the body’s defenses.”
A major discovery in the fight against COVID19
Our scientists @MaxPlanckBris have identified a new drug target in the structure of the virus that could be used to stop it infecting human cells - a potential a€?game changera€? in defeating the pandemic https://t.co/P9Lr6qenOS pic.twitter.com/XgwOuYfO3G
— Bristol University (@BristolUni) September 22, 2020
With the link between SARS-CoV-2 and LA now having been discovered, the Bristol team hopes it may be possible to turn the virus against itself. The idea is that new small-molecule antiviral drugs could fill these “druggable pockets” so that, once the coronavirus has first entered a patient’s body, it becomes a non-infectious dud that cannot spread.
In an interview with Fortune, Berger said there were two possible clinical routes that could now be taken.
In the shorter term, Berger said, LA could become part of a cocktail of drugs alongside other drugs such as Gilead’s remdesivir, which inhibits another protein in the virus and which has been shown to shorten hospital recovery times for some patients.
LA is nontoxic, and most drugs being considered for coronavirus treatment have side effects, so it is possible that the addition of LA could make it possible to “reduce the amount of other drugs [in the cocktail] to achieve the same beneficial effect,” he said.
In the longer term, Berger suggested, it might be possible to find a molecule that is “even better than LA in closing the spike protein”; the spike protein’s “druggable pockets” seem tailor-made for LA, but that does not mean they cannot take in something else.
This would mean the creation of a new drug for treating COVID-19.
Designer drugs
Stephen Evans, professor of pharmacoepidemiology at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, said in a statement released through the Science Media Centre that people shouldn’t expect the Bristol discovery to yield new drugs anytime soon, if at all.
But it could prove useful if other measures fail to tackle the coronavirus successfully, he said.
“The cost of any new drugs is likely to be very high and take quite a long time to develop, possibly a longer timescale than for vaccines because it would probably not build as easily onto existing drugs as the vaccines have built on existing vaccines,” Evans said. “If COVID-19 becomes a disease that is not able to be eradicated or brought under control by vaccination and other protective measures, this may offer hope for that longer-term future.”
Regarding the Bristol team’s mention of some relevance with remdesivir, Evans noted that remdesivir still hasn’t shown “really strong reductions in mortality.”
“This is a pandemic, and we don’t have anything at the moment that really works,” Berger said. “We hope and pray the vaccines will work out, but there are no guarantees that any of these vaccines will work. [With HIV] after 30 years of research we do not have a vaccine, but what works is a cocktail of antiviral drugs.”
As for whether the Bristol University paper might lead to the creation of a new stand-alone treatment for COVID-19, the researchers pointed out that a similar discovery of a fatty acid in the cold-causing rhinovirus led to the creation of an antiviral (pleconaril) that proved moderately useful in trials and was licensed for use in emergency cases, though side effects stopped it from being used more widely.
“The linoleic acid–binding pocket in SARS-CoV-2 will make an attractive target for possible designer drugs, lead candidates for which already exist from screens for rhinovirus,” said Michael Skinner, a reader in virology at Imperial College London, in the Science Media Centre release responding to the Bristol paper.
“Drug development and testing is likely to take some time and might have limited effect, or might need to be taken shortly after infection,” said Skinner. “Unless the drugs are already well known and tested, there will also be a need to test well for possible side effects.”
Nonetheless, Skinner and other commentators noted that the Bristol group had a good reputation and had used robust techniques to back up their discovery.