我想看一级黄色片_欧美性爱无遮挡电影_色丁香视频网站中文字幕_视频一区 视频二区 国产,日本三级理论日本电影,午夜不卡免费大片,国产午夜视频在线观看,18禁无遮拦无码国产在线播放,在线视频不卡国产在线视频不卡 ,,欧美一及黄片,日韩国产另类

首頁 500強(qiáng) 活動(dòng) 榜單 商業(yè) 科技 領(lǐng)導(dǎo)力 專題 品牌中心
雜志訂閱

原創(chuàng)內(nèi)容為王:Spotify重金加持播客節(jié)目,,或?qū)㈩嵏残袠I(yè)

Aric Jenkins
2020-05-25

盡管播客業(yè)務(wù)的回報(bào)微乎其微,,卻能為Spotify帶來音樂無法提供的東西:原創(chuàng)內(nèi)容。

文本設(shè)置
小號
默認(rèn)
大號
Plus(0條)

圖片來源:GettyImages

2019年2月,,Spotify首席執(zhí)行官丹尼爾·??诵家?.4億美元收購播客公司Gimlet和Anchor,并宣稱Spotify旨在成為世界領(lǐng)先的音頻平臺(tái)——而不僅僅是音樂領(lǐng)域,。他在博客文章《音頻優(yōu)先》中寫道,,盡管播客業(yè)務(wù)規(guī)模相對較小,但擁有“令人難以置信的增長潛力”,。

一年后,,播客業(yè)的表現(xiàn)依舊平平。根據(jù)德勤的報(bào)告顯示,,全球播客市場在2020年預(yù)計(jì)增長30%,,將首次突破10億美元大關(guān)。但和錄制音樂及電臺(tái)廣播市場相比,,這個(gè)數(shù)字實(shí)在不值一提,。錄制音樂的收入在2020年預(yù)計(jì)可達(dá)210億美元,電臺(tái)廣播則將達(dá)到420億美元,。

但是,,Spotify無需為此感到不安。盡管播客業(yè)務(wù)的回報(bào)微乎其微,,卻能為這家瑞典公司帶來音樂無法提供的東西:原創(chuàng)內(nèi)容,。通過收購Gimlet等內(nèi)容制作公司,,還有后來買下的Parcast和比爾·西蒙斯的網(wǎng)站The Ringer,Spotify可利用播客增加訂戶數(shù)量和廣告業(yè)績,。

在上周,,這一戰(zhàn)略迎來了巔峰時(shí)刻:該公司與全球最受歡迎的明星播客喬·羅根簽訂了一份多年期的獨(dú)家播放協(xié)議,據(jù)悉價(jià)值高達(dá)1億美元,。

羅根的播客節(jié)目《喬·羅根體驗(yàn)》擁有龐大的聽眾群,是知名度最高的非媒體類個(gè)人播客,,在蘋果的播客排行榜上長年與榜首僅一步之遙,。截至本周三,該節(jié)目位居榜單第二,。羅根在去年表示,,節(jié)目的月下載量約為1.9億次。Spotify希望,,從今年秋季獨(dú)家播放羅根的節(jié)目后,,能收獲來自其他平臺(tái)的數(shù)百萬名聽眾。

此舉表明,,人們的播客消費(fèi)方式將發(fā)生根本性的轉(zhuǎn)變,。安卓的應(yīng)用商店Google Play和蘋果的App Store上有幾十個(gè)播客應(yīng)用,而蘋果設(shè)備的預(yù)裝播客應(yīng)用仍是目前使用率最高的一款,。通常來說,,任意一款應(yīng)用都能下載和收聽播客節(jié)目。但如今,,業(yè)界最知名的播客節(jié)目只能在一個(gè)平臺(tái)上收聽了,,那就是Spotify。

此前,,播客的基本商業(yè)模式即:播客主盡可能到更多平臺(tái)上發(fā)布節(jié)目,,借此吸引大量廣告商,從打賞和商品銷售中賺取額外利潤,。而現(xiàn)在,,Spotify和羅根簽訂的獨(dú)播授權(quán)協(xié)議表明,該行業(yè)或?qū)⒃趦蓚€(gè)方面發(fā)生重大變化:

付費(fèi)訂閱的播客終于要來了,?

首先,,未來那些最受歡迎的播客都會(huì)以付費(fèi)訂閱的方式運(yùn)營,而不會(huì)在公開平臺(tái)發(fā)布,。不過這并不是一個(gè)全新的概念:去年,,初創(chuàng)公司Luminary獲得風(fēng)投支持,將自身定位為“播客界的Netflix”,,同時(shí)推出了40多個(gè)無廣告的獨(dú)播節(jié)目,,每月訂閱費(fèi)為8美元,。該公司籌集了近1億美元,并向業(yè)內(nèi)一些頂級主播拋出了橄欖枝,,比如美國公共廣播電臺(tái)節(jié)目主持人,、播客節(jié)目《我的創(chuàng)業(yè)歷程》的主播蓋伊·拉茲,。但該公司成立后,有關(guān)廣告模式的負(fù)面報(bào)道也隨之而來,。被Spotify收入麾下的Gimlet,、《紐約時(shí)報(bào)》等行業(yè)中堅(jiān)力量,以至羅根本人,,都拒絕登陸該平臺(tái)。今年1月,,Luminary將訂閱費(fèi)調(diào)降至每月5美元,。5月初,據(jù)彭博社報(bào)道,,Luminary旗下僅有8萬名訂閱用戶,,而且每個(gè)月都在虧錢,。

Spotify也提供無廣告的高級訂閱服務(wù),。當(dāng)然,與前者最大的不同之處在于,,該服務(wù)包含了海量音樂庫和精心編排的播放清單。每月10美元的訂閱費(fèi)可讓用戶同時(shí)收聽播客和音樂,,并結(jié)合Spotify頗受歡迎的發(fā)現(xiàn)算法發(fā)掘新意。Spotify憑借內(nèi)部的播客公司可繼續(xù)在訂閱服務(wù)中提供獨(dú)播節(jié)目,,以此催生訂閱需求,。雖然Spotify表示,有廣告的免費(fèi)用戶仍可收聽原創(chuàng)節(jié)目和羅根的節(jié)目,,但在未來也可能要求用戶付費(fèi)訂閱。Spotify在最近宣布,,付費(fèi)訂戶已超過1.3億——對于播客發(fā)行商來說,,相較Luminary,,這個(gè)數(shù)字更具吸引力,。

授權(quán)將成為發(fā)展方向

Spotify和羅根簽約的舉動(dòng)還表明,授權(quán)協(xié)議可能是播客主未來的發(fā)展方向,。就像音樂人、電視節(jié)目和電影那樣,,我們可能會(huì)看到越來越多的主播把節(jié)目獨(dú)家授權(quán)給特定的服務(wù)商,,類似于電視節(jié)目被轉(zhuǎn)售到Netflix、Hulu,、亞馬遜等平臺(tái)播放,。

羅根與Spotify的交易亦是反?,F(xiàn)象,。正如音樂作家特德?焦亞所言,,一位音樂家的作品需要在Spotify播放230億次(每次播放的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)報(bào)酬為0.437美分),才能和羅根的1億美元協(xié)議相提并論,。焦亞寫道:“換言之,,比起史上任何一位音樂人,,Spotify更看重羅根的價(jià)值,?!?/font>

大多數(shù)播客主播都無法指望賺取這么高的報(bào)酬。但可以肯定的是,,有些人已經(jīng)意識到,,在這種獨(dú)播許可協(xié)議下,熱門播客原來也能創(chuàng)造如此豐厚的利潤,。Spotify砸下5億多美元收購播客和尋求授權(quán),,就清楚表明了自己的意圖:他們想要攻占播客市場,而且可能還會(huì)發(fā)起更多同類型的交易。但是,,谷歌,、亞馬遜、蘋果等公司可能也會(huì)選擇加入競爭,。

羅根和Spotify簽約的消息在播客界掀起了軒然大波,,也讓獨(dú)立播客應(yīng)用的開發(fā)者想知道后續(xù)會(huì)產(chǎn)生何種結(jié)果?!皢獭ち_根遲早會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn),,為一個(gè)開放、免費(fèi)的現(xiàn)有節(jié)目設(shè)立付費(fèi)墻,,勢必會(huì)流失大量聽眾,,”廣受好評的的播客應(yīng)用Overcast的創(chuàng)辦者馬爾科·阿蒙特在推特上寫道,?!拔蚁M辽倌転楣娞峁┕?jié)目,,如此一來,,當(dāng)Spotify的獨(dú)播授權(quán)失效時(shí),,他還可以重回業(yè)界?!?/font>

目前,外界還需要更多時(shí)間才能評估Spotify重金加持播客圈帶來的影響。但已讓人一目了然的是,,該公司非常重視播客領(lǐng)域,。這項(xiàng)與最知名播客達(dá)成的1億美元授權(quán)交易不僅首開先例,,似乎注定還將改變整個(gè)行業(yè)。(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))

譯者:Emily

2019年2月,,Spotify首席執(zhí)行官丹尼爾·??诵家?.4億美元收購播客公司Gimlet和Anchor,,并宣稱Spotify旨在成為世界領(lǐng)先的音頻平臺(tái)——而不僅僅是音樂領(lǐng)域,。他在博客文章《音頻優(yōu)先》中寫道,,盡管播客業(yè)務(wù)規(guī)模相對較小,,但擁有“令人難以置信的增長潛力”,。

一年后,,播客業(yè)的表現(xiàn)依舊平平,。根據(jù)德勤的報(bào)告顯示,,全球播客市場在2020年預(yù)計(jì)增長30%,將首次突破10億美元大關(guān),。但和錄制音樂及電臺(tái)廣播市場相比,,這個(gè)數(shù)字實(shí)在不值一提。錄制音樂的收入在2020年預(yù)計(jì)可達(dá)210億美元,,電臺(tái)廣播則將達(dá)到420億美元,。

但是,Spotify無需為此感到不安,。盡管播客業(yè)務(wù)的回報(bào)微乎其微,,卻能為這家瑞典公司帶來音樂無法提供的東西:原創(chuàng)內(nèi)容。通過收購Gimlet等內(nèi)容制作公司,,還有后來買下的Parcast和比爾·西蒙斯的網(wǎng)站The Ringer,,Spotify可利用播客增加訂戶數(shù)量和廣告業(yè)績。

在上周,,這一戰(zhàn)略迎來了巔峰時(shí)刻:該公司與全球最受歡迎的明星播客喬·羅根簽訂了一份多年期的獨(dú)家播放協(xié)議,,據(jù)悉價(jià)值高達(dá)1億美元。

羅根的播客節(jié)目《喬·羅根體驗(yàn)》擁有龐大的聽眾群,,是知名度最高的非媒體類個(gè)人播客,,在蘋果的播客排行榜上長年與榜首僅一步之遙。截至本周三,,該節(jié)目位居榜單第二,。羅根在去年表示,節(jié)目的月下載量約為1.9億次,。Spotify希望,,從今年秋季獨(dú)家播放羅根的節(jié)目后,能收獲來自其他平臺(tái)的數(shù)百萬名聽眾,。

此舉表明,,人們的播客消費(fèi)方式將發(fā)生根本性的轉(zhuǎn)變。安卓的應(yīng)用商店Google Play和蘋果的App Store上有幾十個(gè)播客應(yīng)用,,而蘋果設(shè)備的預(yù)裝播客應(yīng)用仍是目前使用率最高的一款,。通常來說,任意一款應(yīng)用都能下載和收聽播客節(jié)目,。但如今,,業(yè)界最知名的播客節(jié)目只能在一個(gè)平臺(tái)上收聽了,,那就是Spotify。

此前,,播客的基本商業(yè)模式即:播客主盡可能到更多平臺(tái)上發(fā)布節(jié)目,,借此吸引大量廣告商,從打賞和商品銷售中賺取額外利潤,。而現(xiàn)在,,Spotify和羅根簽訂的獨(dú)播授權(quán)協(xié)議表明,該行業(yè)或?qū)⒃趦蓚€(gè)方面發(fā)生重大變化:

付費(fèi)訂閱的播客終于要來了,?

首先,,未來那些最受歡迎的播客都會(huì)以付費(fèi)訂閱的方式運(yùn)營,而不會(huì)在公開平臺(tái)發(fā)布,。不過這并不是一個(gè)全新的概念:去年,,初創(chuàng)公司Luminary獲得風(fēng)投支持,將自身定位為“播客界的Netflix”,,同時(shí)推出了40多個(gè)無廣告的獨(dú)播節(jié)目,,每月訂閱費(fèi)為8美元。該公司籌集了近1億美元,,并向業(yè)內(nèi)一些頂級主播拋出了橄欖枝,,比如美國公共廣播電臺(tái)節(jié)目主持人、播客節(jié)目《我的創(chuàng)業(yè)歷程》的主播蓋伊·拉茲,。但該公司成立后,,有關(guān)廣告模式的負(fù)面報(bào)道也隨之而來。被Spotify收入麾下的Gimlet,、《紐約時(shí)報(bào)》等行業(yè)中堅(jiān)力量,,以至羅根本人,都拒絕登陸該平臺(tái),。今年1月,,Luminary將訂閱費(fèi)調(diào)降至每月5美元。5月初,,據(jù)彭博社報(bào)道,,Luminary旗下僅有8萬名訂閱用戶,而且每個(gè)月都在虧錢,。

Spotify也提供無廣告的高級訂閱服務(wù),。當(dāng)然,,與前者最大的不同之處在于,,該服務(wù)包含了海量音樂庫和精心編排的播放清單。每月10美元的訂閱費(fèi)可讓用戶同時(shí)收聽播客和音樂,,并結(jié)合Spotify頗受歡迎的發(fā)現(xiàn)算法發(fā)掘新意,。Spotify憑借內(nèi)部的播客公司可繼續(xù)在訂閱服務(wù)中提供獨(dú)播節(jié)目,,以此催生訂閱需求。雖然Spotify表示,,有廣告的免費(fèi)用戶仍可收聽原創(chuàng)節(jié)目和羅根的節(jié)目,,但在未來也可能要求用戶付費(fèi)訂閱。Spotify在最近宣布,,付費(fèi)訂戶已超過1.3億——對于播客發(fā)行商來說,,相較Luminary,這個(gè)數(shù)字更具吸引力,。

授權(quán)將成為發(fā)展方向

Spotify和羅根簽約的舉動(dòng)還表明,,授權(quán)協(xié)議可能是播客主未來的發(fā)展方向。就像音樂人,、電視節(jié)目和電影那樣,,我們可能會(huì)看到越來越多的主播把節(jié)目獨(dú)家授權(quán)給特定的服務(wù)商,類似于電視節(jié)目被轉(zhuǎn)售到Netflix,、Hulu,、亞馬遜等平臺(tái)播放。

羅根與Spotify的交易亦是反?,F(xiàn)象,。正如音樂作家特德?焦亞所言,一位音樂家的作品需要在Spotify播放230億次(每次播放的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)報(bào)酬為0.437美分),,才能和羅根的1億美元協(xié)議相提并論,。焦亞寫道:“換言之,比起史上任何一位音樂人,,Spotify更看重羅根的價(jià)值,。”

大多數(shù)播客主播都無法指望賺取這么高的報(bào)酬,。但可以肯定的是,,有些人已經(jīng)意識到,在這種獨(dú)播許可協(xié)議下,,熱門播客原來也能創(chuàng)造如此豐厚的利潤,。Spotify砸下5億多美元收購播客和尋求授權(quán),就清楚表明了自己的意圖:他們想要攻占播客市場,,而且可能還會(huì)發(fā)起更多同類型的交易,。但是,谷歌,、亞馬遜,、蘋果等公司可能也會(huì)選擇加入競爭。

羅根和Spotify簽約的消息在播客界掀起了軒然大波,,也讓獨(dú)立播客應(yīng)用的開發(fā)者想知道后續(xù)會(huì)產(chǎn)生何種結(jié)果,?!皢獭ち_根遲早會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn),為一個(gè)開放,、免費(fèi)的現(xiàn)有節(jié)目設(shè)立付費(fèi)墻,,勢必會(huì)流失大量聽眾,”廣受好評的的播客應(yīng)用Overcast的創(chuàng)辦者馬爾科·阿蒙特在推特上寫道,?!拔蚁M辽倌転楣娞峁┕?jié)目,如此一來,,當(dāng)Spotify的獨(dú)播授權(quán)失效時(shí),,他還可以重回業(yè)界?!?/font>

目前,,外界還需要更多時(shí)間才能評估Spotify重金加持播客圈帶來的影響。但已讓人一目了然的是,,該公司非常重視播客領(lǐng)域,。這項(xiàng)與最知名播客達(dá)成的1億美元授權(quán)交易不僅首開先例,似乎注定還將改變整個(gè)行業(yè),。(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))

譯者:Emily

When Spotify CEO Daniel Ek announced the $340 million acquisition of podcast companies Gimlet and Anchor in February 2019, he declared that Spotify’s mission was to become to the world’s leading audio—not just music—platform. In a blog post titled “Audio-First,” he wrote of the “incredible growth potential” for podcasts despite the business being a relatively small one.

A year later, it’s still modest. The global podcasting market in 2020 is expected to grow 30%, surpassing $1 billion for the first time, according to Deloitte. Recorded music, by contrast, is projected to reach $21 billion; radio comes in at $42 billion. But Spotify won’t be bothered. Despite the minimal returns, podcasts offer the Swedish company something it could never have with music: original content. By acquiring content-creating companies like Gimlet—and later Parcast and Bill Simmons’s The Ringer—Spotify could leverage podcasts to increase subscribers and advertising sales. That strategy culminated this week with an exclusive multiyear deal, reportedly worth $100 million, with the world’s biggest podcast star: Joe Rogan.

Rogan’s podcast, The Joe Rogan Experience, is massive. It consistently ranks near the top of Apple’s podcast charts, perched at No. 2 as of Wednesday. He is the highest-profile individual podcaster not affiliated with a media organization. Rogan last year said the show was being downloaded about 190 million times a month. Spotify will hope that when Rogan’s podcast arrives on its app this fall, the exclusive nature of the show will bring millions of listeners from other platforms to Spotify.

Such an arrangement is a fundamental shift in the way people consume podcasts. There are dozens of podcast apps available on Android’s Google Play and Apple’s App Store, and Apple’s default Podcast app that comes pre-installed on Apple devices remains the most used. Generally, any podcast can be downloaded and listened to on any app. Now, the industry’s biggest name is available on just one: Spotify.

Before, the basic business model for podcasting was to distribute shows on as many platforms as possible. Podcasters could then appeal to more advertisers and generate additional profits from crowdfunding and merchandise sales. Spotify and Rogan’s exclusive licensing deal now suggests that the industry could change in two significant ways:

Subscription-supported podcasts—finally?

First is a future in which major podcasts are subscription-based, rather than available on an open marketplace. This isn’t a new concept: Venture-backed startup Luminary positioned itself as the “Netflix of podcasts” last year, launching with more than 40 exclusive shows without ads for $8 a month. The company raised nearly $100 million and courted some of the industry’s top stars, like NPR’s Guy Raz of How I Built This fame. But the company’s launch accompanied negative press over its advertising model. Industry stalwarts like Spotify’s Gimlet, the New York Times, and eventually Rogan himself, withheld popular shows. In January, Luminary lowered its subscription fee to $5 a month. And earlier in May, Bloomberg reported that Luminary has signed up just 80,000 subscribers and was losing money every month.

Spotify also offers a premium, ad-free subscription. The big difference, of course, is that it includes a vast library of recorded music and curated playlists. A $10 monthly fee will get you podcasts as well as music paired with Spotify’s popular discovery algorithms. With Spotify’s roster of in-house podcast companies, Spotify can continue to funnel exclusive shows to the service, increasing the demand for subscriptions. While Spotify has said free, ad-supported users can still access its original shows, as well as Rogan’s, there’s nothing stopping them from making a premium subscription a requirement in the future. Compared to Luminary, Spotify recently announced it reached more than 130 million paying subscribers—a much more enticing figure to podcast publishers.

Licensing the way forward

Rogan’s deal also shows that licensing agreements may be a way forward for podcasters. Similar to musical artists, television shows, and movies, we might see a future in which more and more podcasters exclusively license their content to particular services, similar to how TV shows move from Netflix to Hulu to Amazon, and so on.

Rogan’s deal with Spotify is an anomaly: As music writer Ted Gioia pointed out, a musician would need to generate 23 billion streams on the service at the standard $.00437 rate per stream to match the $100 million agreement with Rogan. “In other words,” Gioia wrote, “Spotify values Rogan more than any musician in the history of the world.”

Most podcasters can’t expect to earn such a high fee. But it’s safe to assume some are realizing how lucrative a hit podcast can be under this type of exclusive licensing deal. Spotify, having spent well over half a billion dollars on podcast acquisitions and licensing, has made its intentions clear: It wants to own the podcasting market and may have more of these deals up its sleeve. But others—Google, Amazon, Apple, to name a few—may choose to compete.

News of Rogan’s deal sent shock waves through the podcasting community, and it will leave indie podcast app developers wondering what’s next. “What Joe Rogan is going to find out—after it’s too late—is that moving an existing, open, free show behind a proprietary wall results in massive audience loss,” tweeted Marco Arment, creator of the popular podcast app Overcast. “I hope he at least leaves his public feed up so he can return to it when his Spotify exclusivity fails.”

More time will be needed before the true impact of Spotify’s podcast spending spree can be assessed. But what’s already clear is that the company is taking podcasting very seriously. A first-of-its-kind, $100 million deal with the industry’s biggest star seems destined to change the business.

財(cái)富中文網(wǎng)所刊載內(nèi)容之知識產(chǎn)權(quán)為財(cái)富媒體知識產(chǎn)權(quán)有限公司及/或相關(guān)權(quán)利人專屬所有或持有,。未經(jīng)許可,禁止進(jìn)行轉(zhuǎn)載,、摘編,、復(fù)制及建立鏡像等任何使用。
0條Plus
精彩評論
評論

撰寫或查看更多評論

請打開財(cái)富Plus APP

前往打開
熱讀文章