我想看一级黄色片_欧美性爱无遮挡电影_色丁香视频网站中文字幕_视频一区 视频二区 国产,日本三级理论日本电影,午夜不卡免费大片,国产午夜视频在线观看,18禁无遮拦无码国产在线播放,在线视频不卡国产在线视频不卡 ,,欧美一及黄片,日韩国产另类

Facebook的首席執(zhí)行官這次說(shuō)得一點(diǎn)都沒(méi)錯(cuò),。通過(guò)一系列公開(kāi)評(píng)論，馬克·扎克伯格承認(rèn)了眾所周知的事情：Facebook已經(jīng)成為了一個(gè)可能讓用戶(hù)感到孤單和沮喪的討厭網(wǎng)站,。

扎克伯格也下定決定對(duì)此做些什么,。他把糾偏Facebook列在了自己的2018年度挑戰(zhàn)中。在一次坦率的訪談里,，他稱(chēng)這個(gè)項(xiàng)目是對(duì)女兒的責(zé)任,。

扎克伯格對(duì)《紐約時(shí)報(bào)》（New York Times）表示：“馬克思和奧古斯特長(zhǎng)大以后，感到她們的父親對(duì)世界做了些有益的事情,，這對(duì)我來(lái)說(shuō)很重要,。”

毫無(wú)疑問(wèn),，扎克伯格可以做出這樣的改變——他是一位天賦十足的首席執(zhí)行官,，深受員工愛(ài)戴,，自2004年在宿舍創(chuàng)立公司以來(lái)，一直完全掌控著這里,。問(wèn)題在于他是否會(huì)堅(jiān)持到底,，還是說(shuō)他的宏偉計(jì)劃只是又一次營(yíng)銷(xiāo)造勢(shì)。

沒(méi)錯(cuò),，扎克伯格已經(jīng)宣布了改變計(jì)劃,，例如把與家人和朋友互動(dòng)的重要性調(diào)整至其他業(yè)務(wù)之上。不過(guò)他還可以采取其他一些大動(dòng)作,，向我們展示他確實(shí)真心想要糾偏Facebook,。例如以下五條：

1）坦白Facebook尋找“朋友”的算法

Facebook“你可能認(rèn)識(shí)的人”算法，是其最強(qiáng)大的工具之一,，也是人們感覺(jué)這個(gè)社交網(wǎng)絡(luò)像是由反社會(huì)的操縱者運(yùn)營(yíng)的重要理由,。調(diào)查記者克什米爾·希爾指出，F(xiàn)acebook侵略性的數(shù)據(jù)挖掘技術(shù)導(dǎo)致了許多令人不安的情況,。

其中就包括一位匿名的精子捐獻(xiàn)者在Facebook的可能“朋友”中發(fā)現(xiàn)了他的女兒,，而精神病患者會(huì)看到同病房的其他人出現(xiàn)在“可能認(rèn)識(shí)的人”里。

Facebook堅(jiān)持拒絕公布任何相關(guān)的機(jī)制,，也不給用戶(hù)更多權(quán)限來(lái)設(shè)置誰(shuí)可以搜到他們,。如果扎克伯格真的希望讓Facebook成為更加友好的社區(qū)，他首先可以對(duì)這最令人不安的功能透露一二,。

2）給一個(gè)關(guān)閉嬰兒和動(dòng)物內(nèi)容的開(kāi)關(guān)

我并非針對(duì)嬰兒,，但我不希望他們出現(xiàn)在我的Facebook推送里。不幸的是,，F(xiàn)acebook熱愛(ài)婚姻的算法堅(jiān)持認(rèn)為沒(méi)有比嬰兒更好的事物,，并不斷顯示嬰兒的圖片，他們大多來(lái)自我?guī)缀醪徽J(rèn)識(shí)的父母,。于我而言,，這只是一點(diǎn)小困擾，不過(guò)那些剛剛失去孩子或迫切想要一個(gè)的人恐怕會(huì)對(duì)此感到心碎,。

Facebook的人工智能當(dāng)然已經(jīng)足夠優(yōu)秀到分辨嬰兒圖像,，并讓用戶(hù)選擇減少它們出現(xiàn)的頻率——如果用戶(hù)喜歡，甚至還可以提高頻率,。類(lèi)似的,，那些愛(ài)寵一族喜歡發(fā)布他們小狗或小貓的照片。為什么不設(shè)立一個(gè)選項(xiàng),，讓我們看到更多或更少的動(dòng)物呢,？

3）到國(guó)會(huì)上講述

許多證據(jù)表明，克里姆林宮和其他挑撥者都在利用Facebook病毒性的傳播網(wǎng)絡(luò)在美國(guó)人當(dāng)中搬弄是非：“黑人的命很重要”、“德州分裂”……那些帖子似乎試圖在各個(gè)話題上搞破壞,。在騷亂的大選年,，這進(jìn)一步加劇了美國(guó)的政治分歧。

扎克伯格至少不再說(shuō)這些宣傳會(huì)產(chǎn)生作用的想法“很瘋狂”,。不過(guò)如果他真正想要向美國(guó)人表明他關(guān)注公司對(duì)民主政治的影響,，就應(yīng)該在國(guó)會(huì)展開(kāi)調(diào)查前親自證明這一點(diǎn)，而不是派律師和助理來(lái)解決,。正如Facebook的早期投資者羅杰·麥克納米在《華盛頓月刊》（Washington Monthly）所寫(xiě)的那樣：

“盡管硅谷的許多企業(yè)家都是極端的自由主義者,，但那里的員工還是傾向于理想主義。他們想要相信自己做的是好事,。強(qiáng)迫扎克伯格這樣的科技公司首席執(zhí)行官離開(kāi)發(fā)言人或公關(guān)的庇護(hù),，在公眾面前給他們那套不合道理的說(shuō)辭辯護(hù)，對(duì)于削弱他們?cè)趩T工面前精心維護(hù)的個(gè)人崇拜大有益處,?！?

4）聘用公共編輯

扎克伯格宣布Facebook計(jì)劃降低新聞?lì)愇恼碌谋戎兀@改變不了他經(jīng)營(yíng)著史上最強(qiáng)媒體和廣告公司的事實(shí)（不要忘了Facebook還擁有Instagram和WhatsApp）,。

如果扎克伯格真心想要減少在用戶(hù)推送中充斥的虛假或低質(zhì)量新聞故事,，他可以向新聞界求助。他可以任命一名專(zhuān)業(yè)記者擔(dān)任公共編輯,，讓他/她從內(nèi)部了解Facebook的媒體運(yùn)營(yíng),，并讓他們就公司對(duì)媒體環(huán)境的影響進(jìn)行評(píng)估報(bào)告。

他甚至可以做得更好,，任命兩位這樣的編輯——一位自由派,，一位保守派——來(lái)幫助平息有關(guān)政治傾向的譴責(zé)。

5）讓用戶(hù)成為自身的算法

這無(wú)疑是扎克伯格在Facebook上可以做的最大改善：把所有那些強(qiáng)大算法的鑰匙交給受到它們影響的用戶(hù),。與其看到一系列Facebook程序員精心選擇的帖子，用戶(hù)可以自行選擇他們想看什么,。一些人可能想看新聞文章,，另一些人則可能想看嬰兒照片。

這種選擇的要素可以讓Facebook營(yíng)造更加有尊嚴(yán)的體驗(yàn),，降低了用戶(hù)的被操縱感,。它需要一些實(shí)踐——現(xiàn)有的推送很有用，因?yàn)樗梢宰層脩?hù)看到一系列內(nèi)容,，而不是幾萬(wàn)條人們發(fā)送的推文——但聰明如Facebook,，肯定可以提供工具，讓用戶(hù)限定自己想要的范圍,。

扎克伯格本周在Facebook上寫(xiě)道：“Facebook最優(yōu)先的使命始終是四個(gè)字：‘賦能于人’,。”如果他說(shuō)到做到，就會(huì)承認(rèn)算法的控制權(quán)不應(yīng)掌控在他或是其他高管手中,，而是應(yīng)當(dāng)交給Facebook的用戶(hù),。（財(cái)富中文網(wǎng)）

譯者：嚴(yán)匡正?

Facebook’s CEO is saying all the right things. In a series of public comments, Mark Zuckerberg acknowledged what many people already knew: Facebook has become an unpleasant place that can make users feel lonely and frustrated.

Zuckerberg has also resolved to do something about it. He’s made fixing Facebook his annual challenge for 2018 and, in a candid interview, described the project as a duty to his daughters.

“It’s important to me that when Max and August grow up that they feel like what their father built was good for the world,” Mr. Zuckerberg told the New York Times.

There’s no doubt Zuckerberg can make such changes—he’s a gifted CEO, beloved by his employees, who has total control over the company he started in a dorm room in 2004. The question is whether he’ll actually follow through, or if his grand plan will be just another marketing exercise.

Yes, Zuckerberg has already announced changes, such as favoring interaction with family and friends over businesses. But there are other big steps he could take to show us he’s sincere about fixing Facebook. Here are five:

1) Come clean about how Facebook finds “friends”

Facebook’s “People You May Know” algorithm is one of its most powerful tools, but also a big reason the social network can feel like it’s run by a sociopathic manipulator. As investigative journalist Kashmir Hill revealed, Facebook’s aggressive data-mining tactics have led to many unsettling situations.

These include an anonymous sperm donor seeing his daughter as a possible “friend” on Facebook, and patients in the same psychiatric office seeing others suggested as “people they may know.”

Facebook has resolutely refused to shed any light on how any of this works, or to give users more control over who can find them. If Zuckerberg really wants to make Facebook a more hospitable place, he can start by shedding light on one of its most unsettling features.

2) Give us a switch for babies and animals

I have nothing against babies but I don’t want them in my Facebook feed. Unfortunately, Facebook’s engagement-obsessed algorithm insists there’s nothing better than a baby—and shows a steady parade of children, often born to people I barely know. This is a minor nuisance to me, but it could be heart-breaking for those who’ve lost a child or want one badly.

Facebook’s artificial intelligence is certainly good enough to identify infant images, and let people choose to see fewer of them—or, if they wish, even more of them. Likewise, the pet-obsessed like to post photos of their puppies and kitties. Why not create a setting to let us see more or fewer animals?

3) Go speak before Congress

There’s plenty of evidence to suggest the Kremlin and other agitators used Facebook’s powerful viral machinery to sow discord among Americans: Posts intended to cause mischief about everything from Black Lives Matter to Texas secession helped exacerbate the country’s political divisions during a turbulent election year.

Zuckerberg has at least stopped saying it’s “crazy” to think none of this propaganda had any influence. But if he really wants to show the American people he cares about his company’s impact on democracy, he can testify in person—rather than sending lawyers or lieutenants—before one of the ongoing Congressional investigations. As early Facebook investor Roger McNamee recently wrote in Washington Monthly:

“While many of the folks who run Silicon Valley are extreme libertarians, the people who work there tend to be idealists. They want to believe what they’re doing is good. Forcing tech CEOs like Zuckerberg to justify the unjustifiable, in public—without the shield of spokespeople or PR spin—would go a long way to puncturing their carefully preserved cults of personality in the eyes of their employees.

4) Hire a public editor

Zuckerberg announced that Facebook intends to downplay posts by news publishers, but this doesn’t change the fact he runs the most powerful media and advertising company in history (don’t forget Facebook owns Instagram and WhatsApp too).

If he is sincere about reducing the fake and low-calorie news stories clogging up users’ Facebook feed, Zuckerberg could turn to the press for help. He could name a professional journalist as a public editor, and give him or her an inside view of Facebook’s media operations—and let them report on the company’s impact on the media.

Even better, he could appoint two such people—a liberal and a conservative—to help deflect accusations of political bias.

5) Let users be their own algorithm

This is easily the biggest thing Zuckerberg could do to improve Facebook: Turn over the keys for its all-powerful algorithms to the people who have to live under them. Instead of seeing a selection of posts curated by a Facebook programmer, users could select for themselves exactly what they want to see. For some, this might be news articles and, for others, it might be babies.

This element of choice would make the Facebook experience feel more dignified, and less manipulative. It would take some practice of course—the existing curation is useful because it lets users see a handful of items rather than the hundreds or thousands of things people post—but a company as clever as Facebook can surely provide tools to winnow down the scope on their own.

“The first four words of Facebook’s mission have always been ‘give people the power’,” Zuckerberg wrote this week. If he means what he says, he’ll acknowledge that control over the algorithm shouldn’t be wielded by him or any other executive, but by Facebook’s users.