????英國(guó)議會(huì)上周發(fā)布的一份長(zhǎng)達(dá)125頁(yè)的報(bào)告稱，新聞集團(tuán)CEO魯伯特?默多克“表現(xiàn)出故意無(wú)視,，而且……彌漫在該組織從上至下的這種文化表明新聞集團(tuán)缺乏有效的企業(yè)治理……魯伯特?默多克和詹姆斯?默多克——應(yīng)當(dāng)做好準(zhǔn)備,，對(duì)此負(fù)責(zé),。”正如最新的投票委托書所示,，魯伯特?默多克控制著這家雙重股權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)公司將近40%的投票權(quán),。新聞集團(tuán)沒(méi)有入選《財(cái)富》雜志的全球最受贊賞公司榜單，它也沒(méi)有回復(fù)要求發(fā)表評(píng)論的電話和郵件,。

????自從英國(guó)電話竊聽(tīng)丑聞爆發(fā)以來(lái),，“我們還沒(méi)有看到魯伯特?默多克提到的全面改革，而且在去年公司董事遭遇高票反對(duì)的局面后,，新聞集團(tuán)也沒(méi)有做出任何改變,。”美國(guó)基督教兄弟投資服務(wù)公司（Christian Brothers Investments）的社會(huì)責(zé)任投資副總監(jiān)朱莉?坦納告訴我說(shuō)：“股東們需要看到董事會(huì)發(fā)生徹底改變,?！被浇绦值芎偷胤金B(yǎng)老基金論壇（Local Authority Pension Fund Forum）已經(jīng)提交一份提案，要求設(shè)立獨(dú)立董事,。

????內(nèi)森?卡明斯基金會(huì)（Nathan Cummings Foundation）的股東活動(dòng)總監(jiān)勞拉?坎普斯在一份電子郵件中告訴我說(shuō),，丑聞爆出后，“我們給了該公司大約6個(gè)月的時(shí)間來(lái)對(duì)股東的嚴(yán)重不滿作出回應(yīng)……結(jié)果只看到一些象征性的改變……因此,，我們決定提出建議,，將雙重股權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)合二為一?！?/p>

????上個(gè)月,，新聞集團(tuán)宣布，為遵從美國(guó)聯(lián)邦通信委員會(huì)對(duì)海外投資者控制權(quán)的相關(guān)要求,，公司將取消非美國(guó)股東的投票權(quán),，但不會(huì)利用這一做法增加默多克的投票權(quán)?？财账箤懙剑骸凹偃缢泄善保òˋ類股和B類股）都擁有投票權(quán),，該公司很可能就不會(huì)違反美國(guó)法律,，也不必為遵從美國(guó)法律而被迫廢止海外投資者的部分投票權(quán),。”

????最后一家值得一提的,、由創(chuàng)始人經(jīng)營(yíng)的公司是切薩皮克,，它也沒(méi)有入圍《財(cái)富》雜志全球最受贊賞公司榜單。上個(gè)月,，路透社的調(diào)查性報(bào)道披露了與切薩皮克一項(xiàng)氣井權(quán)益相關(guān)的貸款安排,，顯示對(duì)公司聯(lián)合創(chuàng)始人兼CEO奧博尼?麥克克蘭頓的監(jiān)督不力，麥克克蘭頓已于上周卸任董事會(huì)主席,。上周三路透社的一則報(bào)道稱,，麥克克蘭頓擔(dān)任公司CEO的4年中,，一直同創(chuàng)辦切薩皮克的共同創(chuàng)始人湯姆?沃德暗中經(jīng)營(yíng)一只2億美元的對(duì)沖基金。去年的投票委托書顯示,，沃德也已經(jīng)獲準(zhǔn)參與這一氣井權(quán)益計(jì)劃,。

????紐約市審計(jì)長(zhǎng)辦公室（New York City Office of the Comptroller）的企業(yè)治理執(zhí)行總監(jiān)麥克?加蘭德表示，他“歡迎（切薩皮克）將CEO與董事長(zhǎng)職位分離的遲到之舉,，但問(wèn)題不只是董事會(huì)的領(lǐng)導(dǎo),。問(wèn)題在于董事會(huì)本身?！奔~約市養(yǎng)老基金已提議在切薩皮克實(shí)施“代理參與”（proxy access）,，允許未來(lái)的股東們通過(guò)官方代理提名董事。根據(jù)去年的投票委托書披露,，切薩皮克的創(chuàng)始人沒(méi)有股票投票控制權(quán),，因此上述提議可能有機(jī)會(huì)獲得通過(guò)。富國(guó)銀行（Wells Fargo）今年的“代理參與”議案獲得高票通過(guò),。紐約市養(yǎng)老基金也在納伯斯工業(yè)公司（Nabors Industries）提出了類似建議,。切薩皮克沒(méi)有回復(fù)要求發(fā)表評(píng)論的電子郵件。

????A 125-page British Parliament report released this week, says News Corp. CEO Rupert Murdoch "exhibited willful blindness and … this culture ... permeated from the top throughout the organisation and speaks volumes about the lack of effective corporate governance at News Corporation … Rupert Murdoch and James Murdoch -- should ultimately be prepared to take responsibility." As of its last proxy filing, Rupert Murdoch controlled nearly 40% of the votes in the dual class share company. News Corp., (NWS) which doesn't appear on Fortune's most admired list, did not respond to a call and email seeking comments.

????Since the U.K. phone hacking scandal broke, "we haven't seen the sweeping changes Rupert Murdoch references, and News Corp. has done nothing about the board in the wake of high no votes against the members last year," Julie Tanner, assistant director of socially responsible investing at Christian Brothers Investments told me. "Shareholders need to see sweeping changes on the board." Christian Brothers and the Local Authority Pension Fund Forum have filed a shareholder proposal calling for an independent chair.

????Laura Campos, director of shareholder activities at the Nathan Cummings Foundation, wrote in an email to me that after the scandal broke, "we gave the company roughly six months to respond to the serious level of shareholder discontent … and saw only token changes … Thus we decided to submit a proposal calling for dual class unification."

????Last month, News Corp. announced it was stripping non-U.S. shareholders of their voting rights to meet FCC requirements on foreign control but would not use the move to increase Murdoch's voting position. Campos wrote "if ALL shares -- both class A and class B -- carried voting rights, the company would most likely not have been in violation of U.S. law and would not have been forced to suspend some of the voting rights of its foreign investors to remain in compliance with it."

????Our final founder-run company of note is Chesapeake Energy (CHK), which also doesn't make the Most Admired list. An investigation by Reuters last month into loans arrangements related to a well ownership scheme uncovered poor oversight of Chesapeake Energy co-founder and CEO Aubrey McClendon who was stripped of the Chair title this week. A new report from Reuters on Wednesday says that for four years as CEO, McClendon had been running a $200 million hedge fund on the side with his Chesapeake co-founder Tom Ward. According to last year's proxy, Ward was also allowed to participate in the well ownership program.

????Mike Garland, executive director for corporate governance at the New York City Office of the Comptroller, says while he "welcomes the belated move to separate the CEO and chair roles, the issues go beyond [just] the leadership of the board. The issue is the board." New York City pension funds have a proxy access proposal at Chesapeake, which would allow shareholders to nominate directors on the official proxy in future years. Based on last year's proxy disclosures, Chesapeake's founders don't control the share votes, so the proposal may have a shot. There was a fairly high vote in favor of proxy access at Wells Fargo (WFC) this year, and the New York City pension fund is introducing a similar proposal at Nabors Industries (NBR). Chesapeake did not respond to an email seeking comment.