????如果你是美國(guó)的一名債務(wù)人，你有一部分債務(wù)的債主可能就是美國(guó)聯(lián)邦政府,。

????金融危機(jī)之后,，美國(guó)聯(lián)邦政策的兩個(gè)主要變化分別是，禁止私人銀行提供聯(lián)邦支持的助學(xué)貸款,，以及接管房利美（Fannie Mae）和房地美（Freddie Mac）,，這意味著美國(guó)聯(lián)邦政府擁有數(shù)萬(wàn)億美元的抵押貸款和助學(xué)貸款債務(wù)。

????這一點(diǎn)使美國(guó)政府在消除經(jīng)濟(jì)復(fù)蘇最大的障礙之一,、也就是消費(fèi)者的債務(wù)時(shí),，處在了有利地位。在線房地產(chǎn)數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)公司Zillow上周二公布了一組數(shù)據(jù),，數(shù)據(jù)顯示,，約有1,000萬(wàn)美國(guó)人或美國(guó)住房貸款的18.8%，所欠的抵押貸款超過(guò)了房地產(chǎn)的價(jià)值,。此外,，據(jù)Zillow估計(jì),，房屋價(jià)值在后三分之一的美國(guó)房主，有三分之一面臨的是資不抵債型的房貸（抵押貸款的余額超過(guò)了房屋的市場(chǎng)價(jià)值）,。

????首次購(gòu)房者往往中意這類房屋,，但它們卻無(wú)法上市，因?yàn)樗鼈兡壳暗乃腥藷o(wú)法剝離與其相關(guān)的抵押貸款,。Zillow首席經(jīng)濟(jì)師斯坦?漢弗萊斯告訴美國(guó)全國(guó)廣播公司消費(fèi)者新聞與財(cái)經(jīng)頻道（CNBC）,，他相信這正是市場(chǎng)上房屋庫(kù)存量低的原因，而低庫(kù)存在近幾個(gè)月延緩了房地產(chǎn)市場(chǎng)的復(fù)蘇,。

????但在消費(fèi)者債務(wù)中,，增長(zhǎng)最快的是助學(xué)貸款。在助學(xué)貸款領(lǐng)域,，聯(lián)邦政府占主導(dǎo)地位,，持有數(shù)以億計(jì)的助學(xué)貸款債務(wù)。

????經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家們幾乎一致認(rèn)為,，過(guò)多的消費(fèi)者負(fù)債對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)不利,。這是經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家肯?羅戈夫和卡門?萊因哈特研究金融危機(jī)的影響得出的最重要的教訓(xùn)之一：金融危機(jī)之后，國(guó)家增長(zhǎng)放緩,，一定程度上是由于系統(tǒng)中存在太多的債務(wù),。正如美國(guó)進(jìn)步中心（Center for American Progress）高級(jí)經(jīng)濟(jì)師亞當(dāng)?赫爾施在上個(gè)月所寫(xiě)的那樣：

????美國(guó)從1982年開(kāi)始經(jīng)歷了三次經(jīng)濟(jì)擴(kuò)張，而此次美國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)復(fù)蘇的速度僅有之前的60%,。在過(guò)往經(jīng)濟(jì)復(fù)蘇的這個(gè)點(diǎn),，經(jīng)濟(jì)平均按照19%的速度擴(kuò)張，但自2009年6月的經(jīng)濟(jì)低谷以來(lái),，美國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)僅增長(zhǎng)了11%。

????第一個(gè)主要區(qū)別在于導(dǎo)致了經(jīng)濟(jì)混亂的因素是房地產(chǎn)崩潰的嚴(yán)重程度及其負(fù)債殘留,。美國(guó)家庭在經(jīng)濟(jì)衰退之前已經(jīng)感覺(jué)到收入縮水,，危機(jī)之后，家庭承擔(dān)的債務(wù)負(fù)擔(dān),，對(duì)個(gè)人和家庭的個(gè)人消費(fèi)產(chǎn)生了不利的影響,，

????個(gè)人消費(fèi)占美國(guó)GDP的70%，但它的擴(kuò)張速度同樣低于之前的幾次擴(kuò)張,。由于家庭需要增加儲(chǔ)蓄來(lái)償還債務(wù)以及重新增加被削減的退休儲(chǔ)蓄,，因此他們就會(huì)減少消費(fèi)。

????美國(guó)政府確實(shí)采取了一些臨時(shí)措施,，避免大型銀行受到三代美國(guó)人才會(huì)遇到一次的金融危機(jī)的影響,，但聯(lián)邦政府為幫助普通消費(fèi)者采取的措施卻少之又少。例如,，美國(guó)財(cái)政部（Treasury Department）在完善住房可償付調(diào)整計(jì)劃（Affordable Modification Program,，HAMP）方面取得了顯著進(jìn)展,，但在減少房利美或房地美背書(shū)的住房貸款的本金方面，卻沒(méi)有推出任何計(jì)劃,。住房可償付調(diào)整計(jì)劃是指,，使用TARP資金，引導(dǎo)私人貸款者減低抵押貸款的賬面價(jià)值,。

????人們一度希望美國(guó)聯(lián)邦住房金融局（FHFA,，房利美與房地美的主管部門）新任局長(zhǎng)梅爾?瓦特會(huì)支持貸款部分免除計(jì)劃。但到目前為止,，瓦特的工作重心依然是其他優(yōu)先任務(wù),，在房貸本金減免方面沒(méi)有采取任何措施。

????美國(guó)西方學(xué)院（Occidental College）城市與環(huán)境政策協(xié)會(huì)研究所（Urban and Environmental Policy Institute）主任彼得?德利爾指出,，從全國(guó)數(shù)據(jù)來(lái)看,，房地產(chǎn)市場(chǎng)似乎正在復(fù)蘇，但在許多社區(qū)依然存在資不抵貸型房貸危機(jī),。德利爾幫助起草了一份報(bào)告,，已經(jīng)在本月早些時(shí)候發(fā)布。報(bào)告顯示,，每十個(gè)美國(guó)人中,，就有一個(gè)生活在受到喪失抵押品贖回權(quán)危機(jī)影響的100個(gè)城市之一，這些地區(qū)22%至56%的房主都面臨著資不抵貸的情況,。幫助這些人重建他們?cè)谧约悍课葜械臋?quán)益,，將給這些城市和整個(gè)國(guó)家經(jīng)濟(jì)帶來(lái)巨額紅利。

????與此同時(shí),，國(guó)會(huì)中的共和黨人一再阻撓允許助學(xué)貸款人以更低的貸款獲得再融資的努力,。他們更傾向于把政府從貸款中獲得的利潤(rùn)留在手里，而不是另外想別的辦法來(lái)支付政府賬單,。

????具有諷刺意味的是,，今天的債務(wù)人可以從華爾街的私人銀行獲得比聯(lián)邦政府更優(yōu)惠的條件，但現(xiàn)實(shí)是,，許多借款人不得不面對(duì)政府的苛刻條件,。

????自有史料記載以來(lái)，政府就一直在實(shí)行債務(wù)減免,。原因很簡(jiǎn)單,，因?yàn)檫@樣做對(duì)整個(gè)社會(huì)有益。2008年的金融危機(jī)百年一遇,，因此,，這也需要我們拿出百年一遇的特殊應(yīng)對(duì)方法。很可惜,，在面對(duì)大銀行的時(shí)候,，我們想到了這一點(diǎn),，但對(duì)其他普通人卻沒(méi)有。（財(cái)富中文網(wǎng)）

????譯者：劉進(jìn)龍/汪皓

????Chances are that if you're a debtor, you owe some of that debt to the federal government.

????Two major changes to federal policy following the financial crisis -- ousting private banks from the provision of federally backed student loans and the takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- mean that the Feds now own or guarantee several trillions of dollars in mortgage loans and student loan debt.

????This puts the federal government in a great position to eliminate one of the biggest obstacles to the economic recovery, namely the indebtedness of consumers. Online real estate database company Zillow released numbers Tuesday, estimating that nearly 10 million Americans -- or 18.8% of those with home loans -- still owe more on their mortgages than their real estate is worth. Furthermore, Zillow estimates that, nationwide, one-third of Americans who own homes in the bottom third of home values have underwater mortgages (the balance of the mortgage is greater than the market value of the home).

????These are the kind of homes that first-time homebuyers tend to seek out, and they are being held off the market because their current owners are unable to offload the mortgages associated with them. Zillow's Chief Economist Stan Humphries told CNBC that he believes this is partly why the inventory of homes on the market is so low, a dynamic that has held back the real estate recovery in recent months.

????The fastest growing segment of consumer debt, however, is student loans. And the federal government dominates the student loan business, as it owns hundreds of millions of dollars in student loan debt.

????Economists are in near-unanimous agreement that too much consumer debt isn't good for the economy. That's one of most important lessons of economists Ken Rogoff and Carmen Reinhardt's recent work on the effects of financial crises: That following such events, countries tend to grow slowly in part because of the existence of too much debt in the system. As Adam Hersch, senior economist at the Center for American Progress, wrote last month:

????Compared to the prior three U.S. expansions, going back to 1982, the economy is recovering at merely 60% of that pace. Whereas at this point in past recoveries, the economy expanded by an average of 19%, today, the U.S. economy has grown just 11% overall since the economy's June 2009 trough.

????The first key difference is what caused this economic mess in the first place, namely, the depth of the real estate collapse and the wicked hangover of debts left in its wake. The burden of these debts on families — who were already feeling an income squeeze before the recession — has taken a heavy toll on individuals and households' personal consumption.

????Personal consumption, which accounts for close to 70% of overall GDP, is also expanding off the pace of prior recoveries. As families need to save more — to pay off debts and rebuild diminished retirement savings — they will consume at a lower rate.

????While the federal government took extraordinary action to shield large banks from the effects of a once-in-three-generations financial crisis, it has done much less to help the average consumer. For example, the Treasury Department has made significant progress in improving its Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) -- which uses TARP funding to induce private lenders to write down the value of mortgages -- but there is still no program to reduce the principal owed by those with Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac-backed home loans.

????There was hope that once Mel Watt, the new director of the FHFA (which is in charge of Fannie and Freddie), would back a program of partial loan forgiveness. But so far, Watt has focused on other priorities and hasn't made a move toward principal reduction.

????Peter Drier, director of the Urban and Environmental Policy Institute at Occidental College, points out that though the real estate market seems to be recovering when you look at nationwide statistics, the underwater mortgage crisis is still current in many communities today. Drier helped craft a report released earlier this month that showed that one in 10 Americans live in one of the 100 cities hardest hit by the foreclosure crisis, places where 22% to 56% of the homeowners are underwater. Helping these people rebuild equity in their homes would pay huge dividends for those cities and the national economy.

????Meanwhile, Republicans in Congress have continued to block efforts to allow student loan borrowers to refinance at lower rates, preferring to keep the profits the government is making on those loans over finding other ways to pay the government's bills.

????It's ironic that a debtor today would have a better shot getting better terms on his loan with a private Wall Street bank than the federal government, but this is the case for many borrowers.

????Governments have been in the business of debt forgiveness since the beginning of recorded history for the simple reason that it benefits society overall. Financial crises like the one we suffered in 2008 come along once in a century, and they require extraordinary, once-in-a-century responses. We figured this out when it came to the big banks, but not for the rest of us.