????市場研究機(jī)構(gòu)渾水（Muddy Waters）繼續(xù)對在美國上市的中國公司窮追猛打,，這次遭到攻擊的是移動(dòng)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)企業(yè)網(wǎng)秦移動(dòng)（attack on NQ Mobile）。正如典型的做空方那樣,，渾水在網(wǎng)秦身上挑了一堆毛病,，以便發(fā)動(dòng)攻勢。我在電子郵件里看到的這個(gè)問題則和網(wǎng)秦披露的現(xiàn)金和短期投資信息有關(guān),。

????下面是網(wǎng)秦年報(bào)中的一張表格,，也是引起眾人關(guān)注的原因,。在所有的財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)告中你們都能看到類似的表格。

????Muddy Waters continued its assault on U.S. listed Chinese companies with an attack on NQ Mobile. As is typical of short seller attacks, Muddy Waters has made a number of allegations, but the one that has been filing up my inbox relates to a disclosure of cash and short-term investments.

????This is the table from NQ Mobile’s 20F that has everyone worked up. You will find a similar one in every financial statement.

????（注：Cash and cahs equivalents – 現(xiàn)金和現(xiàn)金等價(jià)物,，Term deposits – 定期存款,，Short-term investment – 短期投資）

????用這張表格和網(wǎng)秦上年年報(bào)中的同一表格進(jìn)行對比后，渾水一下子來了精神,。

????What got Muddy Waters worked up was a comparison of this table to the prior year’s table.

????大家可以看到,，網(wǎng)秦將現(xiàn)金和現(xiàn)金等價(jià)物的公允價(jià)值等級從第一級調(diào)整為第二級，但沒有解釋原因,。這是網(wǎng)秦自己的失誤,，因?yàn)槿绻隽私忉專湍芑鉁喫痛税l(fā)動(dòng)的攻擊,。但現(xiàn)在的實(shí)際情況卻正好相反,，渾水指出，這項(xiàng)調(diào)整表明現(xiàn)金已經(jīng)轉(zhuǎn)移,，而且已經(jīng)消失,。

????在資產(chǎn)負(fù)債表中，現(xiàn)金和短期投資等金融性資產(chǎn)的價(jià)值是公允價(jià)值,，而非初始成本,。每次公布資產(chǎn)負(fù)債表時(shí)都會(huì)這樣估值，同時(shí)按市場價(jià)格進(jìn)行調(diào)整,，以體現(xiàn)這些資產(chǎn)的當(dāng)前價(jià)值,。由于操作方法不同，2008年金融危機(jī)期間這個(gè)問題引發(fā)了極大的混亂,。美國財(cái)務(wù)會(huì)計(jì)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)委員會(huì)（FASB）和國際會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則委員會(huì)（IASB）于2011年確認(rèn),，雙方統(tǒng)一了美國通用會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則（GAAP）和國際會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則（IFRS）。相關(guān)改革措施包括將信息披露范圍擴(kuò)大到投資的定價(jià)方法,，而目前在中國成為焦點(diǎn)問題的正是這些以前不需要披露的信息,。

????對于按照公允價(jià)值衡量的資產(chǎn)和負(fù)債，公司必須披露估值方法和估值所用的原始數(shù)據(jù),。上述引起爭議的表格對現(xiàn)金和投資的分類依據(jù)是原始數(shù)據(jù),。這些數(shù)據(jù)分為三類，有最可靠的,，也有最不可靠的,。

????一級原始數(shù)據(jù)是最可靠的定價(jià)數(shù)據(jù)，它們是估值當(dāng)天公布財(cái)報(bào)的公司所能得到的同類資產(chǎn)和負(fù)債的報(bào)價(jià),。流通證券有買入價(jià)和賣出價(jià),，這是一級原始數(shù)據(jù)。雖然這些價(jià)格可能出現(xiàn)波動(dòng),，但它們是某個(gè)時(shí)點(diǎn)上價(jià)值水平的可靠依據(jù),?？赡苡腥藭?huì)說，就連銀行活期存款都不能按一級原始數(shù)據(jù)定價(jià),，原因是不存在有報(bào)價(jià)的“同類資產(chǎn)”（雖然現(xiàn)金是定價(jià)的基礎(chǔ)）,。

????As you can see, NQ Mobile has moved its cash and cash equivalents from Level 1 to Level 2 in 2012 and did not tell us why. That is a self-inflicted wound since an explanation probably would have headed off this part of the Muddy Waters attack. Instead, Muddy Waters suggests that the change implies the cash might have been diverted and is not there.

????Financial assets like cash and short-term investments are reported at fair market value on the balance sheet, rather than at their original cost. This valuation is done at every balance sheet date, and the assets are “marked to market” to reflect the current valuation. Differing approaches to doing this led to great confusion during the financial crisis of 2008, and the FASB and IASB conformed US GAAP and IFRS in 2011 to get consistency. Included in those reforms were expanded disclosures about how investments were priced, and it is those expanded disclosures that are getting all the attention in China today.

????For assets and liabilities that are measured at fair market value, companies have to disclose the valuation techniques and inputs to valuation. The table in question categorizes cash and investments by category of input. There are three categories of inputs, ranging from the most reliable to the least reliable.

????Level 1 inputs are the most reliable pricing data. They are quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities that the reporting entity can access at the measurement date. Traded securities have bid/ask prices and are level 1 inputs. While these prices may be volatile, they are reliable evidence of values at a particular point. Some would argue that even current account bank deposits couldn’t be priced with level 1 inputs, since there are no “identical assets” that have quoted prices (although cash is the basic unit of pricing).