風(fēng)投模式的新老之爭(zhēng)
|
????即便是堪稱新模式教父的First Round Capital創(chuàng)立也不滿10年,。而且，雖然它迄今為止的回報(bào)一直相當(dāng)強(qiáng)勁，但它們不一定比Foundry Group,、星火資本（Spark Capital）或合廣投資（Union Square Ventures）的回報(bào)率高——這幾家都是相對(duì)年輕的公司,，主要采用經(jīng)典模式?；蛘?，像凱鵬華盈（Kleiner Perkins）這樣更老一點(diǎn)的公司，擁有人力資源合作伙伴,、市場(chǎng)營(yíng)銷合作伙伴（而且已有時(shí)日）,。 ????我們真正需要的是更多的時(shí)間來(lái)觀察新型風(fēng)投和經(jīng)典風(fēng)投是否存在統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)上的差異，還是每個(gè)陣營(yíng)中只是有幾個(gè)異數(shù),。如果是前者,，那么“失敗”的一方需要進(jìn)行調(diào)整。如果是后者,，這將推翻萊西的主旨思想（文章題目沒(méi)有很好地體現(xiàn)）,。 ????與此同時(shí)，當(dāng)今的創(chuàng)業(yè)者不應(yīng)該按模式來(lái)評(píng)判風(fēng)投,。不管它們是多么新潮,，還是多么經(jīng)典。（財(cái)富中文網(wǎng)）?? |
????Even First Round Capital, arguably the new model's godfather, was founded less than a decade ago. And while its returns so far have been very strong, they are not necessarily better than those produced by Foundry Group, Spark Capital or Union Square Ventures -- all relatively young firms that primarily employ classic models. Or an older firm like Kleiner Perkins, which has an HR partner, marketing partner, etc. (and has for some time). ????What we really need is more time to see if there is a statistical differentiation between new and classic VC, or just several outliers in both camps. If the former, then the "losing" side will need to make adjustments. If the latter, then it would validate Lacy's central thesis (which isn't terribly well-served by her post's title). ????In the meantime, today's entrepreneurs shouldn't judge a VC firm by its model. No matter how novel or antiquated. |
最新文章
最新文章：
中國(guó)煤業(yè)大遷徙
| 中國(guó) | 美國(guó) | 日本 | 法國(guó) |
| 德國(guó) | 英國(guó) | 瑞士 | 韓國(guó) |
| 荷蘭 | 加拿大 | 印度 | 巴西 |
| 意大利 | 澳大利亞 | 俄羅斯 | 西班牙 |
| 能源 | 金融 | 汽車(chē)相關(guān) |
| IT行業(yè) | 商業(yè),、零售 | 房地產(chǎn)、建筑 |
| 金屬產(chǎn)品 | 航空,、航天 | 食品相關(guān) |
| 電信 | 保險(xiǎn)行業(yè) | 鐵路運(yùn)輸 |