????Facebook首席執(zhí)行官馬克?扎克伯格

????問：“馬克?扎克伯格能看到每個人的Facebook頁面嗎？”

????答：可能吧,。用Facebook共享的信息有可能被這位Facebook公司級別最高的管理者看到,。（但他是否有時間或者興趣？也許沒有吧）

????問：“馬克?扎克伯格是中央情報局特工嗎,？”

????答：不是?。ㄖ辽伲覀兛梢钥隙ㄟ@一點(diǎn)）,。盡管洋蔥新聞網(wǎng)( The Onion )說,，這家流行的社交網(wǎng)絡(luò)不是政府監(jiān)控機(jī)構(gòu)，它的創(chuàng)始人也不是一位“代號為霸主(The Overlord),，獲得授勛的特工,。”但我們覺得,，如果把這個代號放在名片上,，那肯定挺潮的,。

????問：“為什么馬克?扎克伯格是強(qiáng)盜式貴族？”

????答：盡管他顯然缺乏傳說中的面部毛發(fā)——我們通?？梢栽谶@一術(shù)語原本指稱的19世紀(jì)工業(yè)家身上看到這種特征——扎克伯格的身家估計達(dá)到了令人瞠目的190億美元,。（這些財富是否源自“掠奪”和“欺詐”，還是你自己來判斷吧）??

????Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg

????Q: "Can Mark Zuckerberg see everyone's Facebook?"

????A: Probably. Information shared with Facebook is likely viewable by Facebook's highest ranking executive. (Does he have the time or interest? Probably not.)

????Q: "Mark Zuckerberg is a CIA agent."

????A: No! (At least, we're pretty sure.) Despite what The Onion says, the popular social network is not a government surveillance apparatus, and its founder is not a "decorated agent codenamed The Overlord." Though we think that would look pretty snazzy on business cards.

????Q: "Why is Mark Zuckerberg a robber baron?"

????A: Despite a conspicuous lack of legendary facial hair, as is typically seen on the 19th century industrialists for whom this term is usually reserved, Zuckerberg's net worth is estimated to be an eye-popping $19 billion. (Whether you deem that to be from "plundering" and "swindling" is up to you.)??